Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what do Biden's "options" have to do with him glancing at pictires of starving Palestinian children / sniper victims and carelessly thrusting the photos back to the dr who took them and say why are you showing me these, ive already seen all this?


or repeating islamaphobic LIES that he SAW (he didnt see this b/c it doesnt exist) beheaded babies? There was plenty of horror and pain to see in the images of the october 7th but using the word beheading is just as bad as GW using the word 'crusade' and btw Harris had the Cheneys (!!!!!) campaigning.

Nothing would have changed. At all.

Biden repeatedly called himself a Zionist who cited meeting Golda Meir as a serious formative experience. He has been absolutely hawkish and at the furthest right on this position within the Democratic Party since the 1980s. This is public fact.

I find the posters, and I don’t know how many of them exist or their sex, but I’m guessing 2 “good liberal women” total, who repeatedly post their “sucks to be them, they want to die faster? Okay, I’ll be good with that” sentiment utterly chilling and repellant.

The "die faster" comments originated from a poster who was rationalizing their vote for Trump. Basically, they reasoned it will be more merciful for Gazans to die quickly under a Trump admin than to prolong the agony.

Irrelevant and overall a total lie. This has been a common post over the past year here from Democratic voters. Ask Jeff.

You should look at what happened in Detroit and suburbs.

Anonymous wrote:Trump will let Netanyahu do whatever he wants. From now through the next four years, the blood of every dead Gazan child, the death of every innocent Lebanese, will be on the hands of Dearborn Muslims.

Tell me, how did the Biden administration constrain Netanyahu?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what do Biden's "options" have to do with him glancing at pictires of starving Palestinian children / sniper victims and carelessly thrusting the photos back to the dr who took them and say why are you showing me these, ive already seen all this?


or repeating islamaphobic LIES that he SAW (he didnt see this b/c it doesnt exist) beheaded babies? There was plenty of horror and pain to see in the images of the october 7th but using the word beheading is just as bad as GW using the word 'crusade' and btw Harris had the Cheneys (!!!!!) campaigning.

Nothing would have changed. At all.

Biden repeatedly called himself a Zionist who cited meeting Golda Meir as a serious formative experience. He has been absolutely hawkish and at the furthest right on this position within the Democratic Party since the 1980s. This is public fact.

I find the posters, and I don’t know how many of them exist or their sex, but I’m guessing 2 “good liberal women” total, who repeatedly post their “sucks to be them, they want to die faster? Okay, I’ll be good with that” sentiment utterly chilling and repellant.

The "die faster" comments originated from a poster who was rationalizing their vote for Trump. Basically, they reasoned it will be more merciful for Gazans to die quickly under a Trump admin than to prolong the agony.

There’s a segment of the electorate who previously considered themselves stalwart Democrats but who have now decided that enough is enough.

For some, the issue was the perception of reckless immigration policy.

For others, the issue was the perception of extremism in transgender accommodations and other social issues of the day.

But there’s a third group that’s probably lost to the Democratic Party forever.

On the basis of two related issues - America’s role in the world and particularly the Biden Administration’s foreign policy, and the servile posture of the American political class toward Israeli and Jewish American interests (from John Fetterman mocking protesters by waving an Israeli flag from the rooftop of his home, to Bill Clinton marble mouthing “I’ve got news for you, they were there first” days before the election) - a segment of the American electorate decided that punishing a Democratic Party that is viewed as weak and unwilling to hear their voices was well worth the risks associated with a second Trump presidency.

It’s also worth nothing that many of the individuals in that segment are secure, wealthy white men and women who will be largely shielded from the potential risks of this second Trump administration anyway. So there’s minimal, if any, cutting off of one’s nose to spite their faces here. And they understand that the two party system creates the illusion of meaningful choice.

This was about forcing either a hard reset or a place in the dustbin of history.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was in grad school, the Arab male students would treat women like their servants in school and on trips. And you think they will vote for a woman president?

Exactly. The religious groups hate women (evangelical, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims - all have questionable views/practices about women). The sooner we get people to abandoned religion the closer we will get to a better, more peaceful society.

Muslim men didn’t hate Hillary Clinton or Gretchen Whitmer.

Kamala lost 78% of black men. She’s a loser. She was a weak candidate that Biden purposely endorsed so the party couldn’t run Newsom. That’s who Queen Nancy and King Obama wanted to anoint

This is yet another MAGA lie.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/

In both 2024 and 2020, just under 8 in 10 Black men supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

In Michigan, Harris performed better among Black men; nearly 9 in 10 Black men in Michigan voted for Harris according to preliminary exit polls, nearly matching the share of Black women’s support in that state.

Yes stop blaming black people for the loss. This is because of white people and Latino men. Most Latino men would never vote for a woman president. I feel sorry for the white suburban women who have internalized misogyny and remain subservient to men.

Let's maybe stop blaming anyone? It's not helpful and all the categories you mention also voted for Harris. It'd be more helpful to find out why people voted the way they did.

They voted the way they did because they wanted what he was selling. It's not a trick question.

It is, because you need to know what he is selling so you can emulate it and get people to buy you next time.

Basically, you're mad at the Democratic Partly, so to punish them, you voted for the most pro-Zionist administration in US history.

Brilliant.

Anonymous wrote:Are they stupid racists? That seems to be the explanation for everything.

Democrats are still busy labeling the majority of voters: “stupid racists!”

Stupid racist Arabs, stupid racist Muslims, stupid racist Latinos ( - who, are too stupid and transphobic to call themselves LatinX as they have been told), stupid Black men, etc.

Your identity politics don’t fool anyone anymore, dems. Learn and change, or accept your political demise.

Biden calling himself a Zionist was a huge misstep.

Anonymous wrote:what do Biden's "options" have to do with him glancing at pictires of starving Palestinian children / sniper victims and carelessly thrusting the photos back to the dr who took them and say why are you showing me these, ive already seen all this?


or repeating islamaphobic LIES that he SAW (he didnt see this b/c it doesnt exist) beheaded babies? There was plenty of horror and pain to see in the images of the october 7th but using the word beheading is just as bad as GW using the word 'crusade' and btw Harris had the Cheneys (!!!!!) campaigning.

Nothing would have changed. At all.

Biden repeatedly called himself a Zionist who cited meeting Golda Meir as a serious formative experience. He has been absolutely hawkish and at the furthest right on this position within the Democratic Party since the 1980s. This is public fact.

I find the posters, and I don’t know how many of them exist or their sex, but I’m guessing 2 “good liberal women” total, who repeatedly post their “sucks to be them, they want to die faster? Okay, I’ll be good with that” sentiment utterly chilling and repellant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was in grad school, the Arab male students would treat women like their servants in school and on trips. And you think they will vote for a woman president?

Exactly. The religious groups hate women (evangelical, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims - all have questionable views/practices about women). The sooner we get people to abandoned religion the closer we will get to a better, more peaceful society.

Muslim men didn’t hate Hillary Clinton or Gretchen Whitmer.

Kamala lost 78% of black men. She’s a loser. She was a weak candidate that Biden purposely endorsed so the party couldn’t run Newsom. That’s who Queen Nancy and King Obama wanted to anoint

This is yet another MAGA lie.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/

In both 2024 and 2020, just under 8 in 10 Black men supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

In Michigan, Harris performed better among Black men; nearly 9 in 10 Black men in Michigan voted for Harris according to preliminary exit polls, nearly matching the share of Black women’s support in that state.

Yes stop blaming black people for the loss. This is because of white people and Latino men. Most Latino men would never vote for a woman president. I feel sorry for the white suburban women who have internalized misogyny and remain subservient to men.

Let's maybe stop blaming anyone? It's not helpful and all the categories you mention also voted for Harris. It'd be more helpful to find out why people voted the way they did.

They voted the way they did because they wanted what he was selling. It's not a trick question.

Was there any demographic Kamala won? I’m hearing Trump even dominated with young people under 30.

This is truly a multicultural and multigenerational rejection of the entire Democrat Party and this administration

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was in grad school, the Arab male students would treat women like their servants in school and on trips. And you think they will vote for a woman president?

Exactly. The religious groups hate women (evangelical, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims - all have questionable views/practices about women). The sooner we get people to abandoned religion the closer we will get to a better, more peaceful society.

Muslim men didn’t hate Hillary Clinton or Gretchen Whitmer.

Kamala lost 78% of black men. She’s a loser. She was a weak candidate that Biden purposely endorsed so the party couldn’t run Newsom. That’s who Queen Nancy and King Obama wanted to anoint

This is yet another MAGA lie.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/

In both 2024 and 2020, just under 8 in 10 Black men supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

In Michigan, Harris performed better among Black men; nearly 9 in 10 Black men in Michigan voted for Harris according to preliminary exit polls, nearly matching the share of Black women’s support in that state.

Yes stop blaming black people for the loss. This is because of white people and Latino men. Most Latino men would never vote for a woman president. I feel sorry for the white suburban women who have internalized misogyny and remain subservient to men.

Let's maybe stop blaming anyone? It's not helpful and all the categories you mention also voted for Harris. It'd be more helpful to find out why people voted the way they did.

Rashida Tlaib won in Michigan and so did Ilhan Omar. The community is not anti woman or anti black. Barack won Michigan before 10pm both times.

Kamala and the current Biden admin. just sucks really hard. Everyone knows that and frankly liberals cherry picking minorities to blame is disgusting. All of America wanted Trump and Republicans back in the Senate. We all saw that map.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was in grad school, the Arab male students would treat women like their servants in school and on trips. And you think they will vote for a woman president?

Exactly. The religious groups hate women (evangelical, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims - all have questionable views/practices about women). The sooner we get people to abandoned religion the closer we will get to a better, more peaceful society.

Muslim men didn’t hate Hillary Clinton or Gretchen Whitmer.

Kamala lost 78% of black men. She’s a loser. She was a weak candidate that Biden purposely endorsed so the party couldn’t run Newsom. That’s who Queen Nancy and King Obama wanted to anoint

This is yet another MAGA lie.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/

In both 2024 and 2020, just under 8 in 10 Black men supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

In Michigan, Harris performed better among Black men; nearly 9 in 10 Black men in Michigan voted for Harris according to preliminary exit polls, nearly matching the share of Black women’s support in that state.

Yes stop blaming black people for the loss. This is because of white people and Latino men. Most Latino men would never vote for a woman president. I feel sorry for the white suburban women who have internalized misogyny and remain subservient to men.