Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Commenters quickly figured out that it’s related to homeless people. Most of those addresses are shelters. So that single voter has been registered many previous times at different addresses. Somehow the voter file is showing all the addresses for which that person has voted. But the system will not accept more than one vote from each voter ID. They apparently fixed the issue.
Also, Matthew DePerno Esq slyly posted an image that cuts off the next column which shows “REJECTED” ballots.
Don’t believe everything you see on social media.
Anonymous wrote:Though he faces charges his vote will still count
https://x.com/craigdmauger/status/1851695285379989703?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m still waiting for evidence of widespread fraud. It’s *crickets*
The standard should not be “no evidence of fraud.”
The standard should be: “verifiably safe and secure elections.”
As long as it is the former, then the losing side will have an ability to lack confidence in the electoral process.
Recall, there were some circles of passionate Dems that believed something below board happened in Cuyahoga County, OH that swung Ohio to GWB in 2004.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was caught. The system works!
Try reading the article. He was only caught because he literally told on himself. How many hundreds or thousands of U-M students did the same and didn't call the clerk? Nobody knows. This crap is fraud and it's rampant. And I will bet anything the charge is quietly dropped after the election because he's ESL.
The non citizen voter rate is 0.0004%. Chill
If all it takes is checking a box and there is zero verification, how do you know? The “system” didn’t catch that he wasn’t a citizen, because there is system and no checking. He called the SoS office and wanted his ballot back, that is why he was caught.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ID part is meaningless. As a green card holder, he could have gotten a license. It's the other documentation that got him registered. It was a failure, but no one has ever claimed they don't happen. Just that it's rare.
Buckle up people. We're going to be hearing lots of these random stories making it seem like it's a big thing as the trumpers try to get their "the election was stolen!" arguments in order after he loses next week
Make it seem? Why is there this elaborate well-funded operation to get tens of thousands of kids who literally do not live in Michigan registered to vote and voting on UofM's campus? Because Michigan's swing state. UofM's campus is over 50% out-of-state and international students. Any in-state kid can easily get an absentee ballot from their hometown clerk. Kids should be voting where they went to high school. If you don't qualify for in-state tuition, you're not a Michigan resident and shouldn't be used as a tool to swing elections. How can anyone with an ounce of morals and integrity support this garbage?
Anonymous wrote:
Commenters quickly figured out that it’s related to homeless people. Most of those addresses are shelters. So that single voter has been registered many previous times at different addresses. Somehow the voter file is showing all the addresses for which that person has voted. But the system will not accept more than one vote from each voter ID. They apparently fixed the issue.
Anonymous wrote:
Commenters quickly figured out that it’s related to homeless people. Most of those addresses are shelters. So that single voter has been registered many previous times at different addresses. Somehow the voter file is showing all the addresses for which that person has voted. But the system will not accept more than one vote from each voter ID. They apparently fixed the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Dont democrats constantly espouse the Nordic countries like Norway? Great, so why isn't the USA like Norway when it comes to basic civic duty of voting?
Norway mandates that voters present a photo ID, including a “passport, driving license, or bank card that includes a photo,” to vote.
Voters in Northern Ireland must present an “acceptable photo identification” to cast an in-person ballot.
Germany requires that voters bring a state-issued voter identification card, but they can substitute another form of ID for that card if they fail to deliver it at the polls.
Ballots in Switzerland are issued by mail, and voters who return their ballots in person are required to show an ID and a state-issued polling card to do so.
France requires a voter ID.
Israel requires a voter ID.
Mexico requires a voter ID.
Iceland requires a voter ID.
https://www.nccivitas.org/civitas-review/fact-check-international-voter-id-laws/
Proof of citizenship to vote is basic damn sense. So why are Dems opposed?
Anonymous wrote:And, he's being prosecuted. Rightly so. One vote is not going to make an election. What if he voted for Trump? The Chinese want Trump to win? Would you still care?
THIS IS NOT A WIDESPREAD PROBLEM NO MATTER WHAT YOUR MAGA MASTER SAYS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was caught. The system works!
Try reading the article. He was only caught because he literally told on himself. How many hundreds or thousands of U-M students did the same and didn't call the clerk? Nobody knows. This crap is fraud and it's rampant. And I will bet anything the charge is quietly dropped after the election because he's ESL.
The non citizen voter rate is 0.0004%. Chill