Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The more I look at how high schools handle their programs, the more I feel like I’m seeing recreational soccer for teens.
The problem is that the quality of play is usually like rec, but the schools *handle their programs like it was the most important athletic event in the world. In the large public schools in Moco at least, it is pretty hard to get on the team. You have to go to the "optional" summer games and somehow make a name for yourself with the coach before tryouts, and then you can still get cut if you have a bad time at tryouts. They load up the squads with over 20 players and then most the kids just sit and watch all the time. There is no emphasis on participation even though the whole idea is that this is just a fun activity you can do to represent your school.
The time commitment is MUCH larger than for high-level club during the season. It's not unusual for HS athletes to have to devote 15-20 hours a week to the team when you factor in travel, required team activities, etc. Players are often punished for missing team events, regardless of the reason. It ends up discouraging a lot of kids from doing soccer at all, which is the opposite of the rec mindset.
And somehow with a few small exceptions, the level of play is still awful and high-level players actually get worse during the season because the coaching is so bad. A lot of the big schools do have many players with high-level travel experience, but in most cases they end up playing down to the level of their competition.
The organization, at least in Maryland, is ridiculous. You have some schools that go undefeated or have great records because they only play against smaller, disadvantaged schools and never challenge themselves. They get a free pass to the state tournament. And they get rewarded with high seeds based on their win ratio - so winning is the only thing that matters, which again is the opposite of rec.
It drives me crazy that there is taxpayer funding for this.
Haha in CA club soccer is 15-20 hours a week year round and top players also do private lessons. Futsal, Mexican leagues, etc on top of that.
Thise private school idiots are out of their minds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what about Glenelg?
Genuine question...is anyone actually scouted through high school soccer? Are there even talented players only doing high school soccer and not club as well?
Teh most talented kids do not play HS - they dont want to get hurt by some field hockey kid from another team trying outside back for the first time.
This is absolutely not true. I would bet 90+% of ECNL boys play and 75% of MLS Next kids. Some DC United players risk repercussions and play against their coaches instructions. They all LOVE playing HS.
Calling BS on this
I don’t know if they LOVE it. But being Varsity Captain, MVP, all Met, all state, maybe even Gatorade player of the year etc is very impressive to college coaches. High school is the only path to those accolades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what about Glenelg?
Genuine question...is anyone actually scouted through high school soccer? Are there even talented players only doing high school soccer and not club as well?
Teh most talented kids do not play HS - they dont want to get hurt by some field hockey kid from another team trying outside back for the first time.
This is absolutely not true. I would bet 90+% of ECNL boys play and 75% of MLS Next kids. Some DC United players risk repercussions and play against their coaches instructions. They all LOVE playing HS.
Calling BS on this
I don’t know if they LOVE it. But being Varsity Captain, MVP, all Met, all state, maybe even Gatorade player of the year etc is very impressive to college coaches. High school is the only path to those accolades.
Add a state championship to this list and you have not just a D1 player, but P4.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The more I look at how high schools handle their programs, the more I feel like I’m seeing recreational soccer for teens.
The problem is that the quality of play is usually like rec, but the schools *handle their programs like it was the most important athletic event in the world. In the large public schools in Moco at least, it is pretty hard to get on the team. You have to go to the "optional" summer games and somehow make a name for yourself with the coach before tryouts, and then you can still get cut if you have a bad time at tryouts. They load up the squads with over 20 players and then most the kids just sit and watch all the time. There is no emphasis on participation even though the whole idea is that this is just a fun activity you can do to represent your school.
The time commitment is MUCH larger than for high-level club during the season. It's not unusual for HS athletes to have to devote 15-20 hours a week to the team when you factor in travel, required team activities, etc. Players are often punished for missing team events, regardless of the reason. It ends up discouraging a lot of kids from doing soccer at all, which is the opposite of the rec mindset.
And somehow with a few small exceptions, the level of play is still awful and high-level players actually get worse during the season because the coaching is so bad. A lot of the big schools do have many players with high-level travel experience, but in most cases they end up playing down to the level of their competition.
The organization, at least in Maryland, is ridiculous. You have some schools that go undefeated or have great records because they only play against smaller, disadvantaged schools and never challenge themselves. They get a free pass to the state tournament. And they get rewarded with high seeds based on their win ratio - so winning is the only thing that matters, which again is the opposite of rec.
It drives me crazy that there is taxpayer funding for this.
Haha in CA club soccer is 15-20 hours a week year round and top players also do private lessons. Futsal, Mexican leagues, etc on top of that.
Thise private school idiots are out of their minds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what about Glenelg?
Genuine question...is anyone actually scouted through high school soccer? Are there even talented players only doing high school soccer and not club as well?
Teh most talented kids do not play HS - they dont want to get hurt by some field hockey kid from another team trying outside back for the first time.
This is absolutely not true. I would bet 90+% of ECNL boys play and 75% of MLS Next kids. Some DC United players risk repercussions and play against their coaches instructions. They all LOVE playing HS.
Calling BS on this
I don’t know if they LOVE it. But being Varsity Captain, MVP, all Met, all state, maybe even Gatorade player of the year etc is very impressive to college coaches. High school is the only path to those accolades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The more I look at how high schools handle their programs, the more I feel like I’m seeing recreational soccer for teens.
The problem is that the quality of play is usually like rec, but the schools *handle their programs like it was the most important athletic event in the world. In the large public schools in Moco at least, it is pretty hard to get on the team. You have to go to the "optional" summer games and somehow make a name for yourself with the coach before tryouts, and then you can still get cut if you have a bad time at tryouts. They load up the squads with over 20 players and then most the kids just sit and watch all the time. There is no emphasis on participation even though the whole idea is that this is just a fun activity you can do to represent your school.
The time commitment is MUCH larger than for high-level club during the season. It's not unusual for HS athletes to have to devote 15-20 hours a week to the team when you factor in travel, required team activities, etc. Players are often punished for missing team events, regardless of the reason. It ends up discouraging a lot of kids from doing soccer at all, which is the opposite of the rec mindset.
And somehow with a few small exceptions, the level of play is still awful and high-level players actually get worse during the season because the coaching is so bad. A lot of the big schools do have many players with high-level travel experience, but in most cases they end up playing down to the level of their competition.
The organization, at least in Maryland, is ridiculous. You have some schools that go undefeated or have great records because they only play against smaller, disadvantaged schools and never challenge themselves. They get a free pass to the state tournament. And they get rewarded with high seeds based on their win ratio - so winning is the only thing that matters, which again is the opposite of rec.
It drives me crazy that there is taxpayer funding for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what about Glenelg?
Genuine question...is anyone actually scouted through high school soccer? Are there even talented players only doing high school soccer and not club as well?
Teh most talented kids do not play HS - they dont want to get hurt by some field hockey kid from another team trying outside back for the first time.
This is absolutely not true. I would bet 90+% of ECNL boys play and 75% of MLS Next kids. Some DC United players risk repercussions and play against their coaches instructions. They all LOVE playing HS.
Calling BS on this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The more I look at how high schools handle their programs, the more I feel like I’m seeing recreational soccer for teens.
The problem is that the quality of play is usually like rec, but the schools *handle their programs like it was the most important athletic event in the world. In the large public schools in Moco at least, it is pretty hard to get on the team. You have to go to the "optional" summer games and somehow make a name for yourself with the coach before tryouts, and then you can still get cut if you have a bad time at tryouts. They load up the squads with over 20 players and then most the kids just sit and watch all the time. There is no emphasis on participation even though the whole idea is that this is just a fun activity you can do to represent your school.
The time commitment is MUCH larger than for high-level club during the season. It's not unusual for HS athletes to have to devote 15-20 hours a week to the team when you factor in travel, required team activities, etc. Players are often punished for missing team events, regardless of the reason. It ends up discouraging a lot of kids from doing soccer at all, which is the opposite of the rec mindset.
And somehow with a few small exceptions, the level of play is still awful and high-level players actually get worse during the season because the coaching is so bad. A lot of the big schools do have many players with high-level travel experience, but in most cases they end up playing down to the level of their competition.
The organization, at least in Maryland, is ridiculous. You have some schools that go undefeated or have great records because they only play against smaller, disadvantaged schools and never challenge themselves. They get a free pass to the state tournament. And they get rewarded with high seeds based on their win ratio - so winning is the only thing that matters, which again is the opposite of rec.
It drives me crazy that there is taxpayer funding for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a ridiculous post - high school soccer is incredibly hard for kids to make.
At our private it is just about anyone who wants to try out. Not hard.
Anonymous wrote:The more I look at how high schools handle their programs, the more I feel like I’m seeing recreational soccer for teens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This varies -- bous vs girls.
This varies by school.
So there is not one answer.
I do ask one question though. If you are at a top private in Honors and AP classes (most rigor) with several hours of homewrok a day and playing club with four practices a week plus work out plus private coach plus games on weekend, how do you do fit in HS soccer? DD could not even if she wanted to.
My sons quit HS Jr year and just did MLSNext. Both straight A students in private. Got into several T-10/20s on their academics alone. Got on college team after acceptance.
Anonymous wrote:This varies -- bous vs girls.
This varies by school.
So there is not one answer.
I do ask one question though. If you are at a top private in Honors and AP classes (most rigor) with several hours of homewrok a day and playing club with four practices a week plus work out plus private coach plus games on weekend, how do you do fit in HS soccer? DD could not even if she wanted to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a ridiculous post - high school soccer is incredibly hard for kids to make.
At our private it is just about anyone who wants to try out. Not hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a ridiculous post - high school soccer is incredibly hard for kids to make.
Hahahaha 😆
You have no idea.