Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, just adding across all high schools. Not just by school.
It's GMU's program, not APS'.
I really don't get all the upset about something that merely accelerates the application process - nothing else: no different eligibility requirements to attend GMU, no scholarship offer, no financial aid - just an expedited and shorter application process. Still have to "accept" and then complete an abbreviated application form, same FAFSA, still apply for any other financial aid and scholarships, still submit supplemental application requirements for specific schools (music, art, ...).
And again, this is GMU's program - not APS' initiative. I guess everyone would be happier if APS said they wouldn't participate at all.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, just adding across all high schools. Not just by school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Perhaps the target schools have more economically disadvantaged and/or first generation students?
yes.
This is a terrible policy. GMU is basically admitting anyone who has a pulse and encouraging students to borrow money for useless degrees. They have become a diploma mill.
This is the problem. GMU is expensive and they are targeting families that can't afford it with students who have a higher chance of needing to drop out due to expenses before finishing the degree. I wonder if there is some incentive the Fed govt gives or the state , if they accept a certain number of students
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Perhaps the target schools have more economically disadvantaged and/or first generation students?
yes.
This is a terrible policy. GMU is basically admitting anyone who has a pulse and encouraging students to borrow money for useless degrees. They have become a diploma mill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Perhaps the target schools have more economically disadvantaged and/or first generation students?
yes.
This is a terrible policy. GMU is basically admitting anyone who has a pulse and encouraging students to borrow money for useless degrees. They have become a diploma mill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Perhaps the target schools have more economically disadvantaged and/or first generation students?
yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Perhaps the target schools have more economically disadvantaged and/or first generation students?
Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent at Innovation elementary, I really wish all those kids were eligible. While our family is not the target audience, the school has a wealth of diversity socioeconomically and many first generation students.
Anonymous wrote:JFC. They can't just do it for all HSs in the area all at once. What an administrative nightmare. First, they want to see if it actually helps anything. Then, each year they expand, giving priority to the schools with the highest # of FRM/first gen families.
The constant whining from the right is RIDICULOUS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is at Yorktown and I wouldn't want her going to GMU because it's too close to home. She needs to go further away to have a more independent college experience.
So now, that's out of the way. This program is a nice thing. Its probably well intentioned. But Yorktown does in fact have some kids who are lower income, so limiting this to WL, WHS and ATT is kind of discriminatory. They should probably do a means-based county-wide program to actually be fair. Plenty of kids at WL and ATT aren't lower income or first generation college students.
I think if it doesn’t yield the result they’re going for, it will be changed.
For now, why don’t you think of if as even the non-economically disadvantaged kids, who have attended Title 1 schools, have some benefit that offsets their lack of academic opportunities/booster/PTA/alumni investment, same as for the disadvantaged kids at the same schools, while the disadvantaged kids at Yorktown do have the benefit of a richer, more connected school community.