Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the way a man is dressed and his way of speaking outs him as gay. Is that what pps are saying?
It's called gaydar, sweetie. And yes, it's been a term casually used by the gay community for...decades?
OK there is nothing casual about labeling a person as gay, possibly outing them based on outward appearance or manner, without any input from them as to their self-identification. Where have you been? Gaydar? Get back in your cave, neanderthal.
Dp- you are wrong. It’s been a thing for decades. It’s definitely called gaydar.
The baby gays aren’t as tuned into it, because they came of age when they had rights.
But don’t worry Tucker is elevating the right people to take those very rights away.
Gaydar is an outdated term for suppossedly identifying, othering, and belittling gay people based on the flimsiest of "clues". Not cool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the way a man is dressed and his way of speaking outs him as gay. Is that what pps are saying?
It's called gaydar, sweetie. And yes, it's been a term casually used by the gay community for...decades?
OK there is nothing casual about labeling a person as gay, possibly outing them based on outward appearance or manner, without any input from them as to their self-identification. Where have you been? Gaydar? Get back in your cave, neanderthal.
Dp- you are wrong. It’s been a thing for decades. It’s definitely called gaydar.
The baby gays aren’t as tuned into it, because they came of age when they had rights.
But don’t worry Tucker is elevating the right people to take those very rights away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the way a man is dressed and his way of speaking outs him as gay. Is that what pps are saying?
It's called gaydar, sweetie. And yes, it's been a term casually used by the gay community for...decades?
OK there is nothing casual about labeling a person as gay, possibly outing them based on outward appearance or manner, without any input from them as to their self-identification. Where have you been? Gaydar? Get back in your cave, neanderthal.
Anonymous wrote:He is a Russian shill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he is a repressed gay man. The ones that hate gays so much seem to just have self hatred.
I get this sense too and he certainly has mannerisms that undermine the alpha male masculinity he seems to wish was actually his.
He is like an antidote for arousal for me personally. I think it's the whining. The least sexy thing I can imagine.
Say more about this. Which mannerisms undermine "alpha male masculinity"?
"I think it's the whining." In a high pitched squeaky voice he goes on and on about how aggrevied he is and how poorly the left treats his people and on and on. His voice has no timbre and provides no sense of confidence or command. He also doesn't stand or hold is body with confidence. I don't think of creating a double chin while complaining as at all masculine or sexy. You may vary!