Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
The Sidwell parents I know are super competitive about everything. I think it does represent most.
I'm not a Sidwell parent, but I don't know why the fact that there are competitive parents there is either surprising or necessarily negative. There's a type of school for everyone. If by "competitive" you mean that they value achievement, then of course they are, or else why would they send their kids to a school such as Sidwell. These are not the type of parents who would be totally fine if their their kids end up partying at a relaxed/average LAC, pulling a B- GPA. There's a type of parent and a type of kid who is gunning for the Ivy League and the Ivy League is full of such kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
The Sidwell parents I know are super competitive about everything. I think it does represent most.
I'm not a Sidwell parent, but I don't know why the fact that there are competitive parents there is either surprising or necessarily negative. There's a type of school for everyone. If by "competitive" you mean that they value achievement, then of course they are, or else why would they send their kids to a school such as Sidwell. These are not the type of parents who would be totally fine if their their kids end up partying at a relaxed/average LAC, pulling a B- GPA. There's a type of parent and a type of kid who is gunning for the Ivy League and the Ivy League is full of such kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
The Sidwell parents I know are super competitive about everything. I think it does represent most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
The Sidwell parents I know are super competitive about everything. I think it does represent most.
+100. Super competitive! Including the seemingly “low key” ones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
The Sidwell parents I know are super competitive about everything. I think it does represent most.
Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
Actually, it does more than you think or would like to think. People cover it up well but it’s there. It’s nuts.
PP you are responding to. That has not been my experience at all. I have three kids, one who has graduated and two who are in the US. I don't think the parents are any more nuts than at any other DC independent school. Regardless of people's experiences, airing this on a public forum is just embarrassing. Just talk to parents at the school who have older kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
Actually, it does more than you think or would like to think. People cover it up well but it’s there. It’s nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
Anonymous wrote:Just a note, as a SFS parent, this board does NOT reflect the craziness of most parents at the school. Yes, there are handful of super type-A, gunner people (as at any school) but, in my experience, this certainly is not representative of the school. It's embarrassing that a handful of parents have these discussions on an anonymous board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone happen to know (for real) the GPA cutoff for Top Quarter of the rising senior class?
I heard it was 3.75ish.
What about the top 10%?
Around 3.9
So, that’s about 12 to 13 students out of ~125. That’s pretty tough.
And then there are the kids who get a little lower than that but who have taken the advanced math track. Many have lower GPAs largely due to Math III and Math IV first semester grades, with no bump at Sidwell for the advanced track (only available in math and science). So you can be in the top 10% for GPA, but if you aren't in the higher track classes you may not really be reflected/recommended as top 10% in the school's recommendations as the need to account for the higher track grades. This year only 8 seniors completed Math IV and they all did very well in college admissions even with come lower math grades over the years. They make up a number of the high ranked college spots. Three of the eight are going to Harvard. I wish the school were a bit more transparent on this so kids really had a better idea where they are comparatively, not to encourage competition among them but because we keep being told colleges compare you to other kids at your school.
Sure but the 3 kids going to Harvard all had 3.95+
How do you know that? Did you see all 3 of their transcripts? Of course you didn’t.
Btw, there are 4 students going to Harvard this year.
The fourth is an athletic recruit. The other 3 definitely had at least a 3.95. I know this for certain. It sounds like you are just coping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone happen to know (for real) the GPA cutoff for Top Quarter of the rising senior class?
I heard it was 3.75ish.
What about the top 10%?
Around 3.9
So, that’s about 12 to 13 students out of ~125. That’s pretty tough.
And then there are the kids who get a little lower than that but who have taken the advanced math track. Many have lower GPAs largely due to Math III and Math IV first semester grades, with no bump at Sidwell for the advanced track (only available in math and science). So you can be in the top 10% for GPA, but if you aren't in the higher track classes you may not really be reflected/recommended as top 10% in the school's recommendations as the need to account for the higher track grades. This year only 8 seniors completed Math IV and they all did very well in college admissions even with come lower math grades over the years. They make up a number of the high ranked college spots. Three of the eight are going to Harvard. I wish the school were a bit more transparent on this so kids really had a better idea where they are comparatively, not to encourage competition among them but because we keep being told colleges compare you to other kids at your school.
Sure but the 3 kids going to Harvard all had 3.95+
How do you know that? Did you see all 3 of their transcripts? Of course you didn’t.
Btw, there are 4 students going to Harvard this year.
The fourth is an athletic recruit. The other 3 definitely had at least a 3.95. I know this for certain. It sounds like you are just coping.
What I know for certain is that you didn’t see those 3 students’ transcripts. It sounds like you are just lying.
Believe whatever you want. It still won’t change the fact that these students maintained ridiculously high GPAs while still taking the advanced math track.
High GPAs? Sure. All of those students having >3.95 GPA? Absolutely not!
At least you admitted you made up the GPA nonsense. It’s simply not true.
Firstly, me saying they ‘had ridiculously high GPAs’ does not equate to me saying that they had lower than a 3.95. Your logic is flawed and you are misinterpreting my claim to fit your own narrative. My child knows these 3 children personally, and can attest that their GPAs were in fact that high.
However, it seems you’ve already made up your mind on this situation, and nothing I say will change what you believe, which is fine. Arguing with someone who isn’t interested in learning the truth is not worth my time.