Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to work on Wall Street anymore? It used to be the only option besides law or medical school. Now there’s the tech industry. Wall Street is less desirable.
Big Tech is dying.
I guess you don't really track.
We just had NVDIA earning yesterday and it was a blast.
Stock almost jumped 10%
NVIDIA hires from the same companies listed. They go for prestige too. FAANG is dying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Except for the tech jobs in AI, right?
If you believe that, then this entire thread is moot because AI is going to kill the Wall Street analyst job. See an excerpt from an article below from the New York Times from April:
The Worst Part of a Wall Street Career May Be Coming to an End
Artificial intelligence tools can replace much of Wall Street’s entry-level white-collar work, raising tough questions about the future of finance.
Until now. Generative artificial intelligence — the technology upending many industries with its ability to produce and crunch new data — has landed on Wall Street. And investment banks, long inured to cultural change, are rapidly turning into Exhibit A on how the new technology could not only supplement but supplant entire ranks of workers.
The jobs most immediately at risk are those performed by analysts at the bottom rung of the investment banking business, who put in endless hours to learn the building blocks of corporate finance, including the intricacies of mergers, public offerings and bond deals. Now, A.I. can do much of that work speedily and with considerably less whining.
“The structure of these jobs has remained largely unchanged at least for a decade,” said Julia Dhar, head of BCG’s Behavioral Science Lab and a consultant to major banks experimenting with A.I. The inevitable question, as she put it, is “do you need fewer analysts?”
Finance is regulated if mistakes happen and it's because of AI the bank will lose millions. They won't take that risk, like they will in tech.
Anonymous wrote:Why is this a goal for so many? These are immoral jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
What jobs will be alive? Finance?
Healthcare
Think again. Many first tier doctors like family doctors, allergy doctors, etc. might lose job.
With little bit more of advancement, I would trust AI more than human primary care doctors.
That's you, most people do not want AI doctors. And the liability insurance would be insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Except for the tech jobs in AI, right?
If you believe that, then this entire thread is moot because AI is going to kill the Wall Street analyst job. See an excerpt from an article below from the New York Times from April:
The Worst Part of a Wall Street Career May Be Coming to an End
Artificial intelligence tools can replace much of Wall Street’s entry-level white-collar work, raising tough questions about the future of finance.
Until now. Generative artificial intelligence — the technology upending many industries with its ability to produce and crunch new data — has landed on Wall Street. And investment banks, long inured to cultural change, are rapidly turning into Exhibit A on how the new technology could not only supplement but supplant entire ranks of workers.
The jobs most immediately at risk are those performed by analysts at the bottom rung of the investment banking business, who put in endless hours to learn the building blocks of corporate finance, including the intricacies of mergers, public offerings and bond deals. Now, A.I. can do much of that work speedily and with considerably less whining.
“The structure of these jobs has remained largely unchanged at least for a decade,” said Julia Dhar, head of BCG’s Behavioral Science Lab and a consultant to major banks experimenting with A.I. The inevitable question, as she put it, is “do you need fewer analysts?”
Finance is regulated if mistakes happen and it's because of AI the bank will lose millions. They won't take that risk, like they will in tech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which do you think you would have more chance at Wall Street
Business/Econ/CS/Math at NYU
vs
Business/Econ/CS/Math at Emory
Depends if it's Stern or not. Emory is the more prestigious school so for econ, CS, and Math it's Emory. NYU Stern is different so NYU for business.
Another delusional shameless Emory person.
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-humanities-schools/economics-rankings
Undergrad one only shows for premium, so this is for grad, but not much difference.
NYU Econ: #11
Emory Econ: #53
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/16lnder/us_news_2024_ranking_of_best_undergraduate/
Undergrad CS
NYU: #40
Emory #63
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/applied-mathematics-rankings
Best math
NYU: #2
Emory: Need I say more?
Emory people please wake the F up already
Yet NYU still didn't make the adjusted ranking now did it? NYU grads do not get the same jobs Emory grads do.
Despite being in New York and Emory in Atlanta. Emory grads make more.
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/search?page=0&sort=threshold_earnings:desc&search=Emory%20University
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/search/?page=0&sort=threshold_earnings:desc&search=New%20York%20University
Emory is also just ranked. NYU boosters need to get over it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
What jobs will be alive? Finance?
Healthcare
Think again. Many first tier doctors like family doctors, allergy doctors, etc. might lose job.
With little bit more of advancement, I would trust AI more than human primary care doctors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
What jobs will be alive? Finance?
Healthcare
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Except for the tech jobs in AI, right?
If you believe that, then this entire thread is moot because AI is going to kill the Wall Street analyst job. See an excerpt from an article below from the New York Times from April:
The Worst Part of a Wall Street Career May Be Coming to an End
Artificial intelligence tools can replace much of Wall Street’s entry-level white-collar work, raising tough questions about the future of finance.
Until now. Generative artificial intelligence — the technology upending many industries with its ability to produce and crunch new data — has landed on Wall Street. And investment banks, long inured to cultural change, are rapidly turning into Exhibit A on how the new technology could not only supplement but supplant entire ranks of workers.
The jobs most immediately at risk are those performed by analysts at the bottom rung of the investment banking business, who put in endless hours to learn the building blocks of corporate finance, including the intricacies of mergers, public offerings and bond deals. Now, A.I. can do much of that work speedily and with considerably less whining.
“The structure of these jobs has remained largely unchanged at least for a decade,” said Julia Dhar, head of BCG’s Behavioral Science Lab and a consultant to major banks experimenting with A.I. The inevitable question, as she put it, is “do you need fewer analysts?”
Finance is regulated if mistakes happen and it's because of AI the bank will lose millions. They won't take that risk, like they will in tech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
What jobs will be alive? Finance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Except for the tech jobs in AI, right?
If you believe that, then this entire thread is moot because AI is going to kill the Wall Street analyst job. See an excerpt from an article below from the New York Times from April:
The Worst Part of a Wall Street Career May Be Coming to an End
Artificial intelligence tools can replace much of Wall Street’s entry-level white-collar work, raising tough questions about the future of finance.
Until now. Generative artificial intelligence — the technology upending many industries with its ability to produce and crunch new data — has landed on Wall Street. And investment banks, long inured to cultural change, are rapidly turning into Exhibit A on how the new technology could not only supplement but supplant entire ranks of workers.
The jobs most immediately at risk are those performed by analysts at the bottom rung of the investment banking business, who put in endless hours to learn the building blocks of corporate finance, including the intricacies of mergers, public offerings and bond deals. Now, A.I. can do much of that work speedily and with considerably less whining.
“The structure of these jobs has remained largely unchanged at least for a decade,” said Julia Dhar, head of BCG’s Behavioral Science Lab and a consultant to major banks experimenting with A.I. The inevitable question, as she put it, is “do you need fewer analysts?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Except for the tech jobs in AI, right?
If you believe that, then this entire thread is moot because AI is going to kill the Wall Street analyst job. See an excerpt from an article below from the New York Times from April:
The Worst Part of a Wall Street Career May Be Coming to an End
Artificial intelligence tools can replace much of Wall Street’s entry-level white-collar work, raising tough questions about the future of finance.
Until now. Generative artificial intelligence — the technology upending many industries with its ability to produce and crunch new data — has landed on Wall Street. And investment banks, long inured to cultural change, are rapidly turning into Exhibit A on how the new technology could not only supplement but supplant entire ranks of workers.
The jobs most immediately at risk are those performed by analysts at the bottom rung of the investment banking business, who put in endless hours to learn the building blocks of corporate finance, including the intricacies of mergers, public offerings and bond deals. Now, A.I. can do much of that work speedily and with considerably less whining.
“The structure of these jobs has remained largely unchanged at least for a decade,” said Julia Dhar, head of BCG’s Behavioral Science Lab and a consultant to major banks experimenting with A.I. The inevitable question, as she put it, is “do you need fewer analysts?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
Nice job sneaking Northeastern in there.
Northeastern is ranked #6 and #9 per capita for Tech placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech
It's also ranked #14 and #12 per capita for Engineering placement.
https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering
![]()
Texh and Engineering doesn't care about prestige
Maybe.
They definitely care about smart kids.
Tech is dying anyway.
Don't tell that to OpenAI, Anthropic and the hundreds of AI companies raking in the VC money right now.
AI is why tech jobs will be dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first thought is that Wall Street will hire from any college that has qualified applicants. Useless lists like this just show us where the highest number of smart people who want to work with money are.
My second is that useless lists like this unnecessarily add to the anxiety of teenagers and parents by implying that it matters a whole lot which college you attend if you want certain jobs. It' doesn't.
Wall Street firms don't even recruit at many colleges -- have you heard of target and non-target. I'm sorry, but where you go to college does matter for finance (IB and consulting) jobs.
They recruit where they do because that's where the greatest concentration of smart people with an interest in IB are located. It's efficient. It would be a stupid business decision, though, to refuse to look at applications from qualified applicants who went elsewhere. So yes, you're more likely to see a recruiter on campus at some places vs. others, but it doesn't give you a leg up on people with similar or superior skills from less known colleges.
As I mentioned above, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JP Morgan Chase), went to Tufts. The CEO of Bank of America's investment branch went to Colgate. The CEO of Schwab went to Ohio U. The CEO of Fidelity went to Hobart and William Smith. Vanguard's chief investment officer went to Penn State and is in charge of a team that manages over 7 TRILLION dollars in assets. None of these people are going to let the name on the diploma get in the way of hiring talent.
If they recruited only for smart kids then Tufts, Georgia tech, Northeastern, Pomona etc would have made the list.
So true.
That person does t know how the recruiting process works. Sure 1-2 kids from Gt and Purdue, Penn state etc may make it through to the summer pipeline, but it’s hard to claw your way there.
Very easy to do it at a lower Ivy or even CMC where there’s a strict process and college name opens the door (yes, kid has to prove self at interview).
Kids from most flagships won’t even get an interview. But good news is they can get all sorts of back office jobs.
Yes my Emory DC, got back office as a health major with a 3.1. Only the schools listed could do that. Tufts, Gatech and the rest need higher GPAs and econ/business to do the same.
Yikes. Back office with an Emory degree?
Where?
In southeast?