Anonymous wrote:OP, if you don't want kids at your event, then don't invite them, problem solved. For other spaces, mind your own business and stop being such a misanthrope. Kids probably don't like you there either, given how much you seem to dislike them. The problem is completely symmetrical.
Anonymous wrote:
3 kid parent here who can afford babysitting, has family locally, and now has one kid old enough to watch her siblings on occasion for short periods. Why in the world would it be a problem if I bring my kids to music class and have them play quietly in the waiting area?
Anonymous wrote:
+100. It is. Why is someone who doesn’t think it is appropriate for kids to be in grocery stores, sports practice, weddings, and music class posting this on a parenting forum? Children are not abhorrent. Your ideas about children are abhorrent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've been invited to 2 child free weddings. Guess what? We're not going. I'm not flying my kids someone to sit in a hotel room with a babysitter.
I wish you could see how insane this is.
You either can’t afford a babysitter and so you are missing out on life events or you have a psychological problem and can’t separate yourself from your children.
Babysitters are a fortune. That money is better off in the college fund. Not missing out.
I’d rather have stuck to 2 rather than 3+ kids if it meant I couldn’t afford a babysitter to attend my friends’ and family weddings.
If your friend claimed she couldn’t come to your wedding because she couldn’t afford a babysitter, it’s probably because she would *actually* prefer to hang out with her kids and watch a movie or play a board game than go to your wedding. Sorry.
This is a different level of insane. It seems some people on this board don’t realize that they don’t have to do everything together with their kids 100% of the time. It’s a psychological issue if you can’t separate yourself from your children.
It’s also a cost issue. For a few hours it could be $100. That may be nothing to you but a lot to others.
Right, so you can barely afford your children. That’s what this post is all about. Thanks for illustrating it so succinctly.
Anonymous wrote:It’s baffling to me why people choose to have three or more kids while they don’t have childcare options and can’t afford a babysitter in regular basis.
They end up tagging those 3-4 kids everywhere they go.
One kid has a music instrument class? All five of them go and then wait for that one.
Adult gathering for like a poker night or a sports event? Bring along the kids as inconvenient for everyone involved as it may be.
Wedding? RSVP for six of us. We can’t leave kids home alone.
It’s a hug inconvenience it just for them, but for others, as well.
What did you think it was going to be like?
Anonymous wrote:Op sounds like someone that wanted 3 kids but couldn’t have them. No one is bother by big families like Op is.
- mom of one (by choice)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've been invited to 2 child free weddings. Guess what? We're not going. I'm not flying my kids someone to sit in a hotel room with a babysitter.
I wish you could see how insane this is.
You either can’t afford a babysitter and so you are missing out on life events or you have a psychological problem and can’t separate yourself from your children.
Babysitters are a fortune. That money is better off in the college fund. Not missing out.
I’d rather have stuck to 2 rather than 3+ kids if it meant I couldn’t afford a babysitter to attend my friends’ and family weddings.
If your friend claimed she couldn’t come to your wedding because she couldn’t afford a babysitter, it’s probably because she would *actually* prefer to hang out with her kids and watch a movie or play a board game than go to your wedding. Sorry.
This is a different level of insane. It seems some people on this board don’t realize that they don’t have to do everything together with their kids 100% of the time. It’s a psychological issue if you can’t separate yourself from your children.
It’s also a cost issue. For a few hours it could be $100. That may be nothing to you but a lot to others.
Right, so you can barely afford your children. That’s what this post is all about. Thanks for illustrating it so succinctly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've been invited to 2 child free weddings. Guess what? We're not going. I'm not flying my kids someone to sit in a hotel room with a babysitter.
I wish you could see how insane this is.
You either can’t afford a babysitter and so you are missing out on life events or you have a psychological problem and can’t separate yourself from your children.
Babysitters are a fortune. That money is better off in the college fund. Not missing out.
I’d rather have stuck to 2 rather than 3+ kids if it meant I couldn’t afford a babysitter to attend my friends’ and family weddings.
If your friend claimed she couldn’t come to your wedding because she couldn’t afford a babysitter, it’s probably because she would *actually* prefer to hang out with her kids and watch a movie or play a board game than go to your wedding. Sorry.
This is a different level of insane. It seems some people on this board don’t realize that they don’t have to do everything together with their kids 100% of the time. It’s a psychological issue if you can’t separate yourself from your children.
It’s also a cost issue. For a few hours it could be $100. That may be nothing to you but a lot to others.
Right, so you can barely afford your children. That’s what this post is all about. Thanks for illustrating it so succinctly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Like who? Most people in DC, like us, have no family here. I would not trust a complete stranger to watch my kids for several days.
It’s called a nanny.
Do you just go everywhere together? Like a gypsy tribe?
What a circus.
They walk 5 abreast everywhere they go clogging aisles in grocery stores, Costco, sidewalks, etc. it would never occur to them to have one parent shop and the other stay home. It’s a big event.
You don't want them to bring the kids in public but you will also be the first to complain if they never learn how to behave in public.
Well you won’t teach them because you clog the aisles and are oblivious to everyone around you.
So do boomers. Maybe they should stay home with a babysitter too.
Reported for ageism. What if the poster had substituted the word blacks? An ism is an ism.
Great. Maybe you should report this whole thread for child-ism. It’s exactly the same thing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've been invited to 2 child free weddings. Guess what? We're not going. I'm not flying my kids someone to sit in a hotel room with a babysitter.
I wish you could see how insane this is.
You either can’t afford a babysitter and so you are missing out on life events or you have a psychological problem and can’t separate yourself from your children.
Babysitters are a fortune. That money is better off in the college fund. Not missing out.
I’d rather have stuck to 2 rather than 3+ kids if it meant I couldn’t afford a babysitter to attend my friends’ and family weddings.
If your friend claimed she couldn’t come to your wedding because she couldn’t afford a babysitter, it’s probably because she would *actually* prefer to hang out with her kids and watch a movie or play a board game than go to your wedding. Sorry.
This is a different level of insane. It seems some people on this board don’t realize that they don’t have to do everything together with their kids 100% of the time. It’s a psychological issue if you can’t separate yourself from your children.
It’s also a cost issue. For a few hours it could be $100. That may be nothing to you but a lot to others.