Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought girls ruled the world. Why would they be worried about going to school with fewer men? Wouldn’t that be a good thing?
Because that is a critical age developmentally and normal socializing/dating is a part of it. Especially for kids who were too busy to have a normal social life in HS and might finally have that chance in a residential college setting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a real problem without an easy solution, and the gender imbalance is going to cause a lot of consequences through young women’s lives. But in the short term, colleges need to find ways to shrink the gam. Even if it means admitting boys with lower grades and qualifications and offering generous financial aid.
I have two daughters. I don't have sons. We raised our daughters to be smart, self-sufficient.
I absolutely want this problem to be resolved because I want my daughters to have their pick of equals in the dating/marriage department. Flame away, but I don't want my daughters to choose to be gay because there are no suitable men to date.
Look at what happened to the black community over the years. Many of their men are not suitable for dating/marriage. So while the women may have babies with them, the men practically abandon their families leaving the women to raise kids in a single parent household. Look at all the problems that is creating. Serious long term damage to the black community because their men are not up to snuff.
I know there has been lots of criticism in the past on all the emphasis there is for girls and their appearance but I think there should be an emphasis to boys on their appearance as well. Put an emphasis on how boys can take care of their appearance, not get addicted to video games, all that stuff. Start building boys up in a healthy way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a real problem without an easy solution, and the gender imbalance is going to cause a lot of consequences through young women’s lives. But in the short term, colleges need to find ways to shrink the gam. Even if it means admitting boys with lower grades and qualifications and offering generous financial aid.
I have two daughters. I don't have sons. We raised our daughters to be smart, self-sufficient.
I absolutely want this problem to be resolved because I want my daughters to have their pick of equals in the dating/marriage department. Flame away, but I don't want my daughters to choose to be gay because there are no suitable men to date.
Look at what happened to the black community over the years. Many of their men are not suitable for dating/marriage. So while the women may have babies with them, the men practically abandon their families leaving the women to raise kids in a single parent household. Look at all the problems that is creating. Serious long term damage to the black community because their men are not up to snuff.
I know there has been lots of criticism in the past on all the emphasis there is for girls and their appearance but I think there should be an emphasis to boys on their appearance as well. Put an emphasis on how boys can take care of their appearance, not get addicted to video games, all that stuff. Start building boys up in a healthy way.
Anonymous wrote:This is a real problem without an easy solution, and the gender imbalance is going to cause a lot of consequences through young women’s lives. But in the short term, colleges need to find ways to shrink the gam. Even if it means admitting boys with lower grades and qualifications and offering generous financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately K-12 is taught by majority female and boys struggle more. Because of this, they burn out and aren’t interested in college. The problem needs to be fixed at that level. Make it more enjoyable for boys, not just sit all day and take notes.
Anonymous wrote:I thought girls ruled the world. Why would they be worried about going to school with fewer men? Wouldn’t that be a good thing?
Anonymous wrote:bfifget strow baker Aren’t you assuming that *your* daughters will get onto the schools “where the boys are” and only someone else’s kid will be rejected from college to make way for the boys your daughter chants to date? What if it goes the other way? Let us know.Anonymous wrote:This is a real problem without an easy solution, and the gender imbalance is going to cause a lot of consequences through young women’s lives. But in the short term, colleges need to find ways to shrink the gam. Even if it means admitting boys with lower grades and qualifications and offering generous financial aid.
bfifget strow baker Aren’t you assuming that *your* daughters will get onto the schools “where the boys are” and only someone else’s kid will be rejected from college to make way for the boys your daughter chants to date? What if it goes the other way? Let us know.Anonymous wrote:This is a real problem without an easy solution, and the gender imbalance is going to cause a lot of consequences through young women’s lives. But in the short term, colleges need to find ways to shrink the gam. Even if it means admitting boys with lower grades and qualifications and offering generous financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Parents need to bar their boys from screens, laziness, and junk food.
Boys should be working out, working hard, playing outside, and studying. It’s our own fault that so many boys suck. Say no to screens and don’t let your boy be a loser.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD wants school that skews male. You also have to look at str8/gay ratio to see your dating options.
They are all STEM schools...RIT, RPI, etc. that are like 75% male and 25% female.
OP here. We've been touring these types of schools as my daughter wants to study engineering. There are a lot of men but frankly, not men that most girls want to date. We were at Georgia Tech this weekend and my daughter (who honestly is not picky about boys) probabably saw a dozen boys that she found attractive. The rest appeared super, super geeky and odd. I'm married to a geek (so I appreciate geeks) but this was next level.
Anonymous wrote:Parents need to bar their boys from screens, laziness, and junk food.
Boys should be working out, working hard, playing outside, and studying. It’s our own fault that so many boys suck. Say no to screens and don’t let your boy be a loser.
Anonymous wrote:What's cringe to me are all the terrible assumptions being spouted in this thread about boys/girls/men/women, dating, the implications of a 60/40 split vs. 50/50, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD wants school that skews male. You also have to look at str8/gay ratio to see your dating options.
They are all STEM schools...RIT, RPI, etc. that are like 75% male and 25% female.
LOL yeah and WPI--she is interested, now how social are these guys? we have to visit. She is tired of the girl drama at her public school and kind of over it.I am glad she has a good foundation with same sex friendships--very important part of the maturation process.