Anonymous wrote:OP here. Just to clarify, I never expect her to live on part time hours and pay. I would help her find another family who needed mornings and see if she could still come to us in the afternoon.
I hear all the comments about wanting her when the baby is here. But I typically don’t have a nanny even touch the baby the whole time I’m on mat leave. That is my bonding time with the new baby and my responsibility, being off work. The day I go back to work is the day the nanny cares for that baby for the first time. This is what I did with my second.
Part of me hopes I won’t go back to my job after my mat leave. I would love to scale back part time then too. But I just don’t know how I’ll feel then. Another reason I am hesitant to shell out $1000+ a week, even though we do love her.
I just don’t know what to do.
Anonymous wrote:Give her some notice for the love of g-d
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Agree to disagree.
Methinks this is a thread full of over entitled nannies, or nannies who have been treated badly by families in the past.
We treat our nanny wonderfully and love her and she loves us. But it’s not a crime, nor is it “selfish, entitled and unrealistic” for our children to grow up and to troubleshoot ideas for how to scale back or adjust our hours, then to come to the conclusion that perhaps the best option is to part ways. Which, though it’s no one’s business and not relevant to my question at hand so I didn’t mention it, was our original agreement with our nanny since last August. She was always aware that we would part ways when the kids went to school all five days. My latest wondering about whether we could extend that timeline was simply because of how much I love her.
“Give her some notice for the love of God” is literally so over the top of a response. What is wrong with you guys. What did you think I would do, kick her out with my boot and change our locks? Literally WTF.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Agree to disagree.
Methinks this is a thread full of over entitled nannies, or nannies who have been treated badly by families in the past.
We treat our nanny wonderfully and love her and she loves us. But it’s not a crime, nor is it “selfish, entitled and unrealistic” for our children to grow up and to troubleshoot ideas for how to scale back or adjust our hours, then to come to the conclusion that perhaps the best option is to part ways. Which, though it’s no one’s business and not relevant to my question at hand so I didn’t mention it, was our original agreement with our nanny since last August. She was always aware that we would part ways when the kids went to school all five days. My latest wondering about whether we could extend that timeline was simply because of how much I love her.
“Give her some notice for the love of God” is literally so over the top of a response. What is wrong with you guys. What did you think I would do, kick her out with my boot and change our locks? Literally WTF.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. After much thought, I've decided we will let her go when school starts this August. I will try to make it work on my own in the afternoons with work. When the baby gets here, I'll take care of all three on my own, knowing the big kids will be in school half the day. When it's time for me to go back to work next spring, I'll decide then what to do, whether daycare, scale back at work, or find a new nanny.
Everyone on this thread was snarky AF which really wasn't necessary and made awful assumptions about me for simply asking a question, but this helped me determine that I really don't need a nanny at this point in our family life, and I should stop trying to stand on my head figuring out how to keep her for 14 hours a week, for only a few months.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. After much thought, I've decided we will let her go when school starts this August. I will try to make it work on my own in the afternoons with work. When the baby gets here, I'll take care of all three on my own, knowing the big kids will be in school half the day. When it's time for me to go back to work next spring, I'll decide then what to do, whether daycare, scale back at work, or find a new nanny.
Everyone on this thread was snarky AF which really wasn't necessary and made awful assumptions about me for simply asking a question, but this helped me determine that I really don't need a nanny at this point in our family life, and I should stop trying to stand on my head figuring out how to keep her for 14 hours a week, for only a few months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP again. I think I’m just going to keep her full time til my due date. Then let her go. I still feel bad she will be sitting around doing nothing all day, but at least I’ll still be working so I can justify the help she will offer me in the afternoon, which I will need.
I still think this reaction is crazy, though. Families grow up. I can’t imagine it’s not a common occurrence for a family to need a nanny to drop down to part time. Meanwhile there must be a lot of stay at home moms (or moms who work part time) with babies not in school yet who would like to have a nanny in the mornings only. I don’t know why that’s so shocking of an idea to propose a type of nanny share where one nanny splits time between two families. But I guess it is. News to me.
There's some, but not nearly as many families are in this situation as there are families that need full time care or afternoon only care.
Also, you have the added complication of wanting your nanny to come back to you full time after several months, which would leave the morning-only family in a lurch.
+1 This. But keeping a good nanny is worth it. OP can ask around and see if she can find a unicorn family that matches the free time nanny will have. Maybe she will find one, but it will likely take some work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP again. I think I’m just going to keep her full time til my due date. Then let her go. I still feel bad she will be sitting around doing nothing all day, but at least I’ll still be working so I can justify the help she will offer me in the afternoon, which I will need.
I still think this reaction is crazy, though. Families grow up. I can’t imagine it’s not a common occurrence for a family to need a nanny to drop down to part time. Meanwhile there must be a lot of stay at home moms (or moms who work part time) with babies not in school yet who would like to have a nanny in the mornings only. I don’t know why that’s so shocking of an idea to propose a type of nanny share where one nanny splits time between two families. But I guess it is. News to me.
There's some, but not nearly as many families are in this situation as there are families that need full time care or afternoon only care.
Also, you have the added complication of wanting your nanny to come back to you full time after several months, which would leave the morning-only family in a lurch.