Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

No, her mom is a screenwriter and a director and her dad is a tv producer.

https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/kristen-stewarts-parents-divorcing-20120903-259c6.html

Why lie about stuff that is so easily disproven? This isn’t the 1950s. It’s easy to confirm things with basic internet searches.

Catering business, lol. Even if that were true, she’d still have a TON of connections. There’s no other way that anyone that unattractive and untalented would have the main role in a major movie franchise. Stop with the PR. It won’t affect our opinions. We have eyes.

Oh darling child, you also have sanity issues. Get off the internet, see a psychiatrist, get your meds upped. It's psychotic your display, utterly psychotic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

She’s been a script supervisor for over three decades, “serving as a liaison between director and editing room.” Yes, that is “influential”:

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-mar-14-la-et-mn-jules-stewart-20130314-story.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

No, her mom is a screenwriter and a director and her dad is a tv producer.

https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/kristen-stewarts-parents-divorcing-20120903-259c6.html

Why lie about stuff that is so easily disproven? This isn’t the 1950s. It’s easy to confirm things with basic internet searches.

Catering business, lol. Even if that were true, she’d still have a TON of connections. There’s no other way that anyone that unattractive and untalented would have the main role in a major movie franchise. Stop with the PR. It won’t affect our opinions. We have eyes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

No, her mom is a screenwriter and a director and her dad is a tv producer.

https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/kristen-stewarts-parents-divorcing-20120903-259c6.html

Why lie about stuff that is so easily disproven? This isn’t the 1950s. It’s easy to confirm things with basic internet searches.

Catering business, lol. Even if that were true, she’d still have a TON of connections. There’s no other way that anyone that unattractive and untalented would have the main role in a major movie franchise. Stop with the PR. It won’t affect our opinions. We have eyes.

Anonymous wrote:What are your thoughts on Actress/Model Kristen Stewart’s newest look? She’s known as a fashion icon. Here is a quick moment of her latest fashion caught by the paparazzi.

Is it too much?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4fb0_mtWvW/?igsh=aml5cm1ybmU5N3p1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are your thoughts on Actress/Model Kristen Stewart’s newest look? She’s known as a fashion icon. Here is a quick moment of her latest fashion caught by the paparazzi.

Is it too much?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4fb0_mtWvW/?igsh=aml5cm1ybmU5N3p1

Anonymous wrote:What are your thoughts on Actress/Model Kristen Stewart’s newest look? She’s known as a fashion icon. Here is a quick moment of her latest fashion caught by the paparazzi.

Is it too much?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4fb0_mtWvW/?igsh=aml5cm1ybmU5N3p1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

You people are weird. She and RP were clearly physically really into each other. And then the person she cheated on him with was another guy. So clearly she’s bi. But why do you even care?

I don't care either way but I do feel like she'll ultimately end up with a cis guy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

You people are weird. She and RP were clearly physically really into each other. And then the person she cheated on him with was another guy. So clearly she’s bi. But why do you even care?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

Anonymous wrote:What are your thoughts on Actress/Model Kristen Stewart’s newest look? She’s known as a fashion icon. Here is a quick moment of her latest fashion caught by the paparazzi.

Is it too much?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4fb0_mtWvW/?igsh=aml5cm1ybmU5N3p1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

She’s been a script supervisor for over three decades, “serving as a liaison between director and editing room.” Yes, that is “influential”:

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-mar-14-la-et-mn-jules-stewart-20130314-story.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vitriol is strong in this one.

Jealousy. Kristen's ground breaking actions and boundary pushing scares some. Including her latest A list movie (critically acclaimed.)

This is a joke, right?

Kristen's mother is in the business. In addition, Kristen - very publicly - f@#$cked a director to ensure she got a certain role.

She is unattractive. She cannot act. And she uses her body and sexual favors in return for things.

Film CATERING business. Hardly influential.
You've lost the plot completely. Go take a few Xanax.