Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any idea why Meg Goldner Rabinowitz’ left GDS? Out of nowhere she gets a job at Maret for, what I believe was, a newly created position—one that was not advertised.
From what I understand - she worked with Maret HOS in prior job. I assume the Maret HOS asked her to come join him to work together again. This is not out of the ordinary in professional life.
+ 1. I’m in HR and it’s expected with executive hires and we plan for it
Here is what is not normal. Allowing the HOS who has struggled across various metrics choose his Associate Head. He has lost the respect of the faculty (it’s bad) and teachers have no idea why the board would allow him to select a friend to come take over a senior role that he created. Why not do a real search and find someone who can actually help the school, the most qualified person? Especially since he continues to flounder in so many public and private ways. It really is hard to witness from the faculty side. This type of “appointment” is not normal.
Shouldn’t you be blaming the board who OK’d it then? I don’t blame him for wanting to bring on someone he trusts- ante executive would try to do this in any job. But the board could have said no.
Let’s get real: The board is not getting rid of this guy after three years. Because it would mean yet another search. Learn to love him- and her for that matter. You’re stuck with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any idea why Meg Goldner Rabinowitz’ left GDS? Out of nowhere she gets a job at Maret for, what I believe was, a newly created position—one that was not advertised.
From what I understand - she worked with Maret HOS in prior job. I assume the Maret HOS asked her to come join him to work together again. This is not out of the ordinary in professional life.
+ 1. I’m in HR and it’s expected with executive hires and we plan for it
Here is what is not normal. Allowing the HOS who has struggled across various metrics choose his Associate Head. He has lost the respect of the faculty (it’s bad) and teachers have no idea why the board would allow him to select a friend to come take over a senior role that he created. Why not do a real search and find someone who can actually help the school, the most qualified person? Especially since he continues to flounder in so many public and private ways. It really is hard to witness from the faculty side. This type of “appointment” is not normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any idea why Meg Goldner Rabinowitz’ left GDS? Out of nowhere she gets a job at Maret for, what I believe was, a newly created position—one that was not advertised.
From what I understand - she worked with Maret HOS in prior job. I assume the Maret HOS asked her to come join him to work together again. This is not out of the ordinary in professional life.
+ 1. I’m in HR and it’s expected with executive hires and we plan for it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any idea why Meg Goldner Rabinowitz’ left GDS? Out of nowhere she gets a job at Maret for, what I believe was, a newly created position—one that was not advertised.
From what I understand - she worked with Maret HOS in prior job. I assume the Maret HOS asked her to come join him to work together again. This is not out of the ordinary in professional life.
Anonymous wrote:By play hard, there's a sense of fun, joy and silliness intentionally peppered into the rigor. What other school is crazy enough to lock up all their 9th graders for an overnight sleepover in the school (not a camp)? It's about a vibe that for certain Sidwell, repeatedly described as a pressure cooker, does not have. St. Albans might have more of a balance -- but I don't think it has the same intentional effort to infuse fun for a lack of better description. It's more the brotherhood vibe and that certainly can help to alleviate academic pressure. Can't speak to GP.
Anonymous wrote:Any idea why Meg Goldner Rabinowitz’ left GDS? Out of nowhere she gets a job at Maret for, what I believe was, a newly created position—one that was not advertised.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We haven't found bringing lunch in HS to be a problem at GDS. I thought it would be a hassle but it just hasn't turned out to be an issue.
What about the social stigma that others have mentioned in this thread? Does your DC mind that they’re bringing lunch when others can go off and buy?
Anonymous wrote:I think we just found the two kids at Maret who like the food!
It used to be incredibly good, but when they changed vendors about five years ago, it went really far downhill. I’m not even sure if they’re working ovens right now?
It used to come from Ridgewells, and the salad bar was incredibly good. I don’t know Ridgewell stopped doing school food, or ask Maret just got too cheap to use them anymore, but it’s a really big step down. And no one complains about it more than the faculty… so it’s not just picky kids, it’s adults with actual taste buds
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The food in Maret cafeteria is so bad that I wouldn’t see a problem if it’s like in GDS without cafeteria. If you have a cafeteria there should be a minimum quality control.
Interesting. My middle schoolers really like it. There’s always a man dish like spaghetti bolognaise or a curry, then something at the Bowl’d station which could be another man dish or a fun smoothie, house made hummus and pita, rotating daily hot sandwich/panini, rotating daily cold sandwich and a salad bar with lots of protein options, dressings etc. Plenty for all to find something they like.
Anonymous wrote:The food in Maret cafeteria is so bad that I wouldn’t see a problem if it’s like in GDS without cafeteria. If you have a cafeteria there should be a minimum quality control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS provides delicious lunches for PK-8. I agree it would be nice to provide them for high school, but seems silly to choose a school based on whether or not they provide a lunch. The tuition is also less than other highly regarded schools in the area, which I’d prefer over having lunch included.
The tuition may be less but it's still a significant amount of money to pay to not lunch. My kid attends. I love the school. I just wish lunch was an option. For some of us it does matter. In my view, GDS would become the undisputed No. 1 school with the addition of lunch and the continued ramping up of its sports programs. The work hard/play hard vibe of the school sets it apart from the others.
Really you think GDS is the only school with a work hard/play hard vibe?![]()
Yes, I will think that, particularly when your reply doesn't offer an alternate example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS provides delicious lunches for PK-8. I agree it would be nice to provide them for high school, but seems silly to choose a school based on whether or not they provide a lunch. The tuition is also less than other highly regarded schools in the area, which I’d prefer over having lunch included.
The tuition may be less but it's still a significant amount of money to pay to not lunch. My kid attends. I love the school. I just wish lunch was an option. For some of us it does matter. In my view, GDS would become the undisputed No. 1 school with the addition of lunch and the continued ramping up of its sports programs. The work hard/play hard vibe of the school sets it apart from the others.
Really you think GDS is the only school with a work hard/play hard vibe?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We haven't found bringing lunch in HS to be a problem at GDS. I thought it would be a hassle but it just hasn't turned out to be an issue.
Love the school but the only niggle is the lunch for US. I know that it has been a factor for some when choosing a school. It's such an easy fix.