Anonymous wrote:OR, you as an individual are putting time and energy into defending WashU on an anonymous forum, and others are doing the same from their perspective. For every fan there is a hater, no AstroTurf required.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is a troll thread full of astroturfing and intentionally incorrect information. Astroturfing is where a single person or small number of people use internet anonymity to create the appearance of the "grass roots" sentiment of many. It usually involves situations where, for example, a new restaurant would post positive but fake reviews of itself on Yelp. But it fits here.
I'm genuinely curious what the anti-WashU poster's deal is. There are places and colleges in America that I'm not wild about. But I can imagine having so much antipathy for a particular college to justify so many posts with such vigor. If OP wants to convince me not to have my kid apply to WashU, perhaps he/she can explain what WashU did to hurt him/her so badly. No sane person would otherwise do what he/she is doing on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.
WashU hasn't yet released their ED info for this cycle or last year's cycle. But for 21/22, WashU ED admissions rate was 26%. (https://wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wustl-cds-2022-2023.pdf). I doubt it jumped 14%, which is contrary to T30 trends. Notably, OP never responded to the post above.
Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking
Does this sound like it was written by a normal human being, let alone one whose opinions you'd value?
Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping
WashU is need blind for domestic applicants. (https://financialaid.wustl.edu/how-aid-works/affordability/). The post above is blatant misinformation.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is a troll thread full of astroturfing and intentionally incorrect information. Astroturfing is where a single person or small number of people use internet anonymity to create the appearance of the "grass roots" sentiment of many. It usually involves situations where, for example, a new restaurant would post positive but fake reviews of itself on Yelp. But it fits here.
I'm genuinely curious what the anti-WashU poster's deal is. There are places and colleges in America that I'm not wild about. But I can imagine having so much antipathy for a particular college to justify so many posts with such vigor. If OP wants to convince me not to have my kid apply to WashU, perhaps he/she can explain what WashU did to hurt him/her so badly. No sane person would otherwise do what he/she is doing on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.
WashU hasn't yet released their ED info for this cycle or last year's cycle. But for 21/22, WashU ED admissions rate was 26%. (https://wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wustl-cds-2022-2023.pdf). I doubt it jumped 14%, which is contrary to T30 trends. Notably, OP never responded to the post above.
Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking
Does this sound like it was written by a normal human being, let alone one whose opinions you'd value?
Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping
WashU is need blind for domestic applicants. (https://financialaid.wustl.edu/how-aid-works/affordability/). The post above is blatant misinformation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.
+1
Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.
Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.
+1
Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.
Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.
Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.
Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking
Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.
+1
Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.
Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.
Anonymous wrote:It is in Missouri.
If you send a kind there now you are 100% an dumbass
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?
Seems to me that's the moral course here.
Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.
Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping