Anonymous wrote:I was pregnant with our third child when my husband of 12 years dropped the bomb on me he was HIV positive. Said he had a one night stand 3 months prior. Never in a million years thought he could do such a thing. Keep your guard up. Praying for you. Thankfully I was negative and my baby was fine. I am now happily remarried.
Anonymous wrote:I was pregnant with our third child when my husband of 12 years dropped the bomb on me he was HIV positive. Said he had a one night stand 3 months prior. Never in a million years thought he could do such a thing. Keep your guard up. Praying for you. Thankfully I was negative and my baby was fine. I am now happily remarried.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe he was just curious?
This makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody has said this clearly so I will. HIV is not a "gay" disease anymore. Our gay brothers take care of themselves. It's not stigmatized at all and there are measures that can be taken and are often discussed.
So, if this is about extramarital sex, i doubt he's with a man.
And nobody's called troll. So I will.
This is so absurd it reeks of virtue signaling. You can argue whatever you want but according to government. 68% of all new HIV cases are gay or bisexual men. What percent of that group makes up the US population. Even a generous demograph is at most 5% of the US population. We want to to talk internationally that is different.
https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/about-hiv-and-aids/who-is-at-risk-for-hiv/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's gay op. Snoop and watch real closely before saying anything. You will find what you're looking for..also get tested asap.
You know that straight men have sex with other men right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most likely because you’re not in monogamous relationship of 20 years. He’s traveling for work? Go get an std panel.
This. Everyone is saying there are innocent explanations, but if it were for a visa, or life insurance, or some mandatory annual what-have-you, OP wouldn't be finding this out this way. Someone who finds out they have to take an HIV test for whatever unexpected non-sexual reason would likely comment on that to their partner in conversation at some point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody has said this clearly so I will. HIV is not a "gay" disease anymore. Our gay brothers take care of themselves. It's not stigmatized at all and there are measures that can be taken and are often discussed.
So, if this is about extramarital sex, i doubt he's with a man.
And nobody's called troll. So I will.
it primarily effects gay men. liberals have gone overboard with the over correction. Women who get infected with HIV primarily get it from men who don’t tell them they have HIV.
stigma exists for a reason. HIV should be stigmatized. The obsession with have a stigma free society is dangerous.
I’m not as liberal as i used to be because liberals are insane.
And there are many gay and bisexual men married to women who don’t know they are—when they cheat with men and have sex once in awhile with their wife to keep up the charade—she’s in danger.
But, to add to this, it's the nature of male homosexual sex that makes HIV spread high risk - specifically rough sex involving bleeding. You can still get it from heterosexual sex but just not as easily as anal sex and needles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody has said this clearly so I will. HIV is not a "gay" disease anymore. Our gay brothers take care of themselves. It's not stigmatized at all and there are measures that can be taken and are often discussed.
So, if this is about extramarital sex, i doubt he's with a man.
And nobody's called troll. So I will.
it primarily effects gay men. liberals have gone overboard with the over correction. Women who get infected with HIV primarily get it from men who don’t tell them they have HIV.
stigma exists for a reason. HIV should be stigmatized. The obsession with have a stigma free society is dangerous.
I’m not as liberal as i used to be because liberals are insane.
And there are many gay and bisexual men married to women who don’t know they are—when they cheat with men and have sex once in awhile with their wife to keep up the charade—she’s in danger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody has said this clearly so I will. HIV is not a "gay" disease anymore. Our gay brothers take care of themselves. It's not stigmatized at all and there are measures that can be taken and are often discussed.
So, if this is about extramarital sex, i doubt he's with a man.
And nobody's called troll. So I will.
it primarily effects gay men. liberals have gone overboard with the over correction. Women who get infected with HIV primarily get it from men who don’t tell them they have HIV.
stigma exists for a reason. HIV should be stigmatized. The obsession with have a stigma free society is dangerous.
I’m not as liberal as i used to be because liberals are insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody has said this clearly so I will. HIV is not a "gay" disease anymore. Our gay brothers take care of themselves. It's not stigmatized at all and there are measures that can be taken and are often discussed.
So, if this is about extramarital sex, i doubt he's with a man.
And nobody's called troll. So I will.
This is so absurd it reeks of virtue signaling. You can argue whatever you want but according to government. 68% of all new HIV cases are gay or bisexual men. What percent of that group makes up the US population. Even a generous demograph is at most 5% of the US population. We want to to talk internationally that is different.
https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/about-hiv-and-aids/who-is-at-risk-for-hiv/