Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

I think if men go in to buy for their wives they probably get to just buy the bag.

+1 I mean, there's still a waiting list, but men don't have to play the game. Make sure he's dressed well and buys something for himself, too.

A friend's husband was in New York for work about ten years ago. He went in and they tried to play the game with him and he was like just get me the bag and they did. So stupid.

I don't understand the point of the game. Are they trying to pretend these bags are a scarce commodity that only very special people are allowed to buy? Or is it not pretending? I don't get it.

Yes. They pretend you’re not worthy of owning one or you can’t afford it or don’t belong on the store just to make you feel like you have to prove yourself by buying it.

People, abusive sales people don’t deserve your money. Hermes is one of the rudest stores but many of them are rude.

Agree. When I read about the ridiculous “process” for being allowed to give a merchant several thousands of dollars I wonder if these buyers have lost all self-respect.

This has been the process since 1880, since the company moved to 24 Faubourg. This is not walmart.

I actually don't think it matters how long this process has been around. Nor am I confusing it with Walmart, but thank you for the clarification. No matter how long people have been doing it, the idea of having to sell yourself and convince a vendor (even a vendor of high quality merchandise-- still a vendor) that you should be allowed to give them a lot of your money strikes me as ludicrous. It makes me sad for people who fall for this or who get excited by the perceived exclusivity or status it confers. Most of the people I know don't need this. (And I am not disputing that these bags can be an investment. The market shows that they can be.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

SA?

SA = Sales Associate
QB is quota bag, not qualifying bag.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there any other fashion items where the buyer has to prove themselves to the seller?

Any haute couture, I would think. If you tried to walk into a truly high end boutique off the street you’d probably get the Julia Roberts -Pretty Woman treatment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

SA?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there any other fashion items where the buyer has to prove themselves to the seller?

Any haute couture, I would think. If you tried to walk into a truly high end boutique off the street you’d probably get the Julia Roberts -Pretty Woman treatment.

Anonymous wrote:Are there any other fashion items where the buyer has to prove themselves to the seller?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

I think if men go in to buy for their wives they probably get to just buy the bag.

+1 I mean, there's still a waiting list, but men don't have to play the game. Make sure he's dressed well and buys something for himself, too.

A friend's husband was in New York for work about ten years ago. He went in and they tried to play the game with him and he was like just get me the bag and they did. So stupid.

I don't understand the point of the game. Are they trying to pretend these bags are a scarce commodity that only very special people are allowed to buy? Or is it not pretending? I don't get it.

Yes. They pretend you’re not worthy of owning one or you can’t afford it or don’t belong on the store just to make you feel like you have to prove yourself by buying it.

People, abusive sales people don’t deserve your money. Hermes is one of the rudest stores but many of them are rude.

Agree. When I read about the ridiculous “process” for being allowed to give a merchant several thousands of dollars I wonder if these buyers have lost all self-respect.

This has been the process since 1880, since the company moved to 24 Faubourg. This is not walmart.

I actually don't think it matters how long this process has been around. Nor am I confusing it with Walmart, but thank you for the clarification. No matter how long people have been doing it, the idea of having to sell yourself and convince a vendor (even a vendor of high quality merchandise-- still a vendor) that you should be allowed to give them a lot of your money strikes me as ludicrous. It makes me sad for people who fall for this or who get excited by the perceived exclusivity or status it confers. Most of the people I know don't need this. (And I am not disputing that these bags can be an investment. The market shows that they can be.)

Exclusivity rules all aspects of life - just visit the college forum to experience the desire and despair. It applies to jobs, housing, even mating.

Very true. But at least with colleges and jobs, the idea of having some intrinsic qualities or acquired qualifications or "fit" are understandable metrics that colleges and employers can and should use. The idea that a handbag vendor has convinced people that anything other than the desire to own and the money to purchase should weigh into it is just silly. That people buy into it enough to partcipate or to defend the process is depressing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Picotins are lovely bags. I have a little collection of them too.

we're horse people, so the shape is adorable.

Hermes makes beautiful saddles but also this $40 bar of glycerin that is absolutely identical to the $5 version and at some point it’s not fun if the joke’s on you, no? I don’t understand the appeal.

https://www.hermes.com/us/en/product/glycerin-soap-H000143Ev00/

Comparatively an Hermes saddle only costs 40% or so more than a comparable saddle, it’s probably the best “value” they sell, but still you have to figure there’s a big up charge for the brand and why would anyone want to feel like a sucker?

Serious riders don’t buy Hermes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

I think if men go in to buy for their wives they probably get to just buy the bag.

+1 I mean, there's still a waiting list, but men don't have to play the game. Make sure he's dressed well and buys something for himself, too.

A friend's husband was in New York for work about ten years ago. He went in and they tried to play the game with him and he was like just get me the bag and they did. So stupid.

I don't understand the point of the game. Are they trying to pretend these bags are a scarce commodity that only very special people are allowed to buy? Or is it not pretending? I don't get it.

Yes. They pretend you’re not worthy of owning one or you can’t afford it or don’t belong on the store just to make you feel like you have to prove yourself by buying it.

People, abusive sales people don’t deserve your money. Hermes is one of the rudest stores but many of them are rude.

Agree. When I read about the ridiculous “process” for being allowed to give a merchant several thousands of dollars I wonder if these buyers have lost all self-respect.

This has been the process since 1880, since the company moved to 24 Faubourg. This is not walmart.

I actually don't think it matters how long this process has been around. Nor am I confusing it with Walmart, but thank you for the clarification. No matter how long people have been doing it, the idea of having to sell yourself and convince a vendor (even a vendor of high quality merchandise-- still a vendor) that you should be allowed to give them a lot of your money strikes me as ludicrous. It makes me sad for people who fall for this or who get excited by the perceived exclusivity or status it confers. Most of the people I know don't need this. (And I am not disputing that these bags can be an investment. The market shows that they can be.)

Exclusivity rules all aspects of life - just visit the college forum to experience the desire and despair. It applies to jobs, housing, even mating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

I think if men go in to buy for their wives they probably get to just buy the bag.

+1 I mean, there's still a waiting list, but men don't have to play the game. Make sure he's dressed well and buys something for himself, too.

A friend's husband was in New York for work about ten years ago. He went in and they tried to play the game with him and he was like just get me the bag and they did. So stupid.

I don't understand the point of the game. Are they trying to pretend these bags are a scarce commodity that only very special people are allowed to buy? Or is it not pretending? I don't get it.

Yes. They pretend you’re not worthy of owning one or you can’t afford it or don’t belong on the store just to make you feel like you have to prove yourself by buying it.

People, abusive sales people don’t deserve your money. Hermes is one of the rudest stores but many of them are rude.

Agree. When I read about the ridiculous “process” for being allowed to give a merchant several thousands of dollars I wonder if these buyers have lost all self-respect.

This has been the process since 1880, since the company moved to 24 Faubourg. This is not walmart.

I actually don't think it matters how long this process has been around. Nor am I confusing it with Walmart, but thank you for the clarification. No matter how long people have been doing it, the idea of having to sell yourself and convince a vendor (even a vendor of high quality merchandise-- still a vendor) that you should be allowed to give them a lot of your money strikes me as ludicrous. It makes me sad for people who fall for this or who get excited by the perceived exclusivity or status it confers. Most of the people I know don't need this. (And I am not disputing that these bags can be an investment. The market shows that they can be.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH bought me one. He played the Hermes game and Birkin was his second QB bag offer. It was quicker than he expected. He also got me a Kelly about a year later. I prefer to the Kelly.

What’s the game?

You buy work with the same SA and develop “a relationship” ie spend money. You develop a wish list. When something on your wish list or similar becomes available and if you “qualify”based on spend level and relationship, you SA will offer you the bag. Hence the term QB, qualifying bag. These are bags that don't go on the floor for general consumption, Birkins, Kelly etc.

There are other nuances and other paths but this is the general simple overview.

I think if men go in to buy for their wives they probably get to just buy the bag.

+1 I mean, there's still a waiting list, but men don't have to play the game. Make sure he's dressed well and buys something for himself, too.

A friend's husband was in New York for work about ten years ago. He went in and they tried to play the game with him and he was like just get me the bag and they did. So stupid.

I don't understand the point of the game. Are they trying to pretend these bags are a scarce commodity that only very special people are allowed to buy? Or is it not pretending? I don't get it.

Yes. They pretend you’re not worthy of owning one or you can’t afford it or don’t belong on the store just to make you feel like you have to prove yourself by buying it.

People, abusive sales people don’t deserve your money. Hermes is one of the rudest stores but many of them are rude.

Agree. When I read about the ridiculous “process” for being allowed to give a merchant several thousands of dollars I wonder if these buyers have lost all self-respect.

This has been the process since 1880, since the company moved to 24 Faubourg. This is not walmart.