Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think in a couple with a car, the non-driver (outside of disability) actually is weaponizing incompetence. Imagine some dude saying "oh I can't cook dinner I might burn the house down" and the wife saying "ah he's got cooking anxiety so it's ok if I have to do all the cooking."
I don't think that's equivalent because there are ways to prepare food that are less likely to burn the house down (use a microwave! Have a fire extinguisher handy! Make a cold sandwich!) but it's not as easy to mitigate risk when driving. If you hit someone, they really could die.
If you set fire to the house, someone really could die.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they have lived in a big urban center or city all their lives (like NYC) then I think nothing of it.
If they live in a place like Northern VA or the burbs, I think they must be incredibly emotionally stunted. [url]Driving isn't just about getting from Point A to Point B - it's about independence and freedom. I get that learning to drive is nerve racking for a lot of people, but emotionally stable people have a stronger sense of independence to want to overcome that nervousness.
It’s funny you say this because I feel entirely the opposite. I do have a license and drive, but it’s entirely a function of needing to get from point A to B. Car ownership is the opposite of freedom to me. It’s so much stupid maintenance and stress. My car is due for an inspection, but I just don’t really want to spend any of my free time dealing with that. I hate the annual property tax. I hate unexpected car repairs. I hate paying for insurance. I hate pumping gas. I hate the actual act of driving and dealing with traffic and idiots on the road like drunk drivers. [b]The idea of the car as freedom is brainwashing by the auto industry when really it is capitalism making us entirely reliant on foreign oil drilling to just leave our homes.
I’m not saying personal vehicles shouldn’t have ever had a place in our transit system, but I think it’s a huge shame we abandoned centuries of city/town planning to create a society entirely around the presumption we’d all forever continue to use something that was invented a little over 100 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is wild to me. All of you associating the ability to operate a single type of machine with maturity. Do you have a similar level of judgement on people who don’t go to college? Don’t own houses in their own names? Hire other people to do their taxes? Don’t have a passport?
The people who get their self esteem by putting down others is growing every minute. It's been true forever that insecure people abound and they live to jump on the littlest weakness of another person. You know they're actually the ones with low iqs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they have lived in a big urban center or city all their lives (like NYC) then I think nothing of it.
If they live in a place like Northern VA or the burbs, I think they must be incredibly emotionally stunted. [url]Driving isn't just about getting from Point A to Point B - it's about independence and freedom[b]. I get that learning to drive is nerve racking for a lot of people, but emotionally stable people have a stronger sense of independence to want to overcome that nervousness.
It’s funny you say this because I feel entirely the opposite. I do have a license and drive, but it’s entirely a function of needing to get from point A to B. Car ownership is the opposite of freedom to me. It’s so much stupid maintenance and stress. My car is due for an inspection, but I just don’t really want to spend any of my free time dealing with that. I hate the annual property tax. I hate unexpected car repairs. I hate paying for insurance. I hate pumping gas. I hate the actual act of driving and dealing with traffic and idiots on the road like drunk drivers. The idea of the car as freedom is brainwashing by the auto industry when really it is capitalism making us entirely reliant on foreign oil drilling to just leave our homes.
I’m not saying personal vehicles shouldn’t have ever had a place in our transit system, but I think it’s a huge shame we abandoned centuries of city/town planning to create a society entirely around the presumption we’d all forever continue to use something that was invented a little over 100 years ago.
You are equating "knowing how to drive" with "owning a car." You can know how to drive so that you can rent a car if you need (or use one of those car-sharing services, if they still exist). You can know how to drive so you can rent the uhaul to move your big piece of furniture.
But you can also have freedom with the ability to order an Uber or pick up the phone to call movers to lug your furniture.
Uber doesn’t exist everywhere. I’ve been to plenty of vacation spots without Ubers. If I relied on them I would have been very restricted in my ability to travel.
Anonymous wrote:I think they grew up in a city. Then I think nothing more of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...and are now in their 40s.
Not because of any trauma or anything, just didn't get around to it.
Have to rely on everyone else to get rides or Uber everywhere.
Obviously there are as many reasons why as there are people who don't drive, and as many different personalities. Why would someone think one thing about a diverse group of individuals like that? The ability to not see human beings as normal people is reaching new lows. Congrats, OP.
Anonymous wrote:...and are now in their 40s.
Not because of any trauma or anything, just didn't get around to it.
Have to rely on everyone else to get rides or Uber everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:I posted previously that I think it’s entitled. I do have a lot of family in NYC and the surrounding boroughs, and it’s pretty common in the older generations of my Italian/puerto Rican family that women simply didn’t learn to drive (actively discouraged/not allowed by spouses). In that case I am sympathetic.