Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.

I have to agree. She looks fine. I see a lot of old pictures from the 1920+ on my Fb newsfeed and women used to be thin. This was how average 20-30 something women looked. Granted, at 50 they weren’t quite as thin, but still WAY thinner than anything I see in public now.

Women her age in the 1920s

Female life expectancy in 1925 was 60yrs, no wonder they looked like this. Amazing how far we've come in just 100 years. NK is a naturally slim person, the amount of jealousy disguised as concern on this thread is amusing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.

+1
Looks like her daughter inherited her long, slim frame.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly she looks skinny, but healthy, but I have to admit she looks like a bobble head doll in the photo where she’s wearing a tie-dye t-shirt.

She looks anorexic in that picture.

Thin-shaming.

She's much healthier than overweight people.

It's not true. When it comes to surviving illnesses/cancer etc it is disadvantageous to be thin. Go read. Slightly overweight people actually fare better.

Never compliment an older relative on a dramatic weight loss.

I make a point never to discuss “losing weight“. or “gaining weight “ or dieting things like that in front of our children. Never.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly she looks skinny, but healthy, but I have to admit she looks like a bobble head doll in the photo where she’s wearing a tie-dye t-shirt.

She looks anorexic in that picture.

Thin-shaming.

She's much healthier than overweight people.

It's not true. When it comes to surviving illnesses/cancer etc it is disadvantageous to be thin. Go read. Slightly overweight people actually fare better.

Never compliment an older relative on a dramatic weight loss.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.

I have to agree. She looks fine. I see a lot of old pictures from the 1920+ on my Fb newsfeed and women used to be thin. This was how average 20-30 something women looked. Granted, at 50 they weren’t quite as thin, but still WAY thinner than anything I see in public now.

Women her age in the 1920s

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly she looks skinny, but healthy, but I have to admit she looks like a bobble head doll in the photo where she’s wearing a tie-dye t-shirt.

She looks anorexic in that picture.

Thin-shaming.

She's much healthier than overweight people.

It's not true. When it comes to surviving illnesses/cancer etc it is disadvantageous to be thin. Go read. Slightly overweight people actually fare better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This photo was attached to an advertisement on another website I was just reading, and I thought immediately of this thread which I had visited this morning. Look at this grocery shopping mom from the 50s/60s - she's ANOREXIC!!





People's notions of what is a normal looking body is totally skewed by the 70% of overweight and obese fellow citizens we see around us every day - or maybe in the mirror.

Nicole Kidman isn't anorexic. She's not even underweight.

Agree. Whenever I see old pictures from even the 80s and earlier, the first thing I notice is how thin everyone was (and dressed nicely). Heathy thin, but would not be considered an anomaly. Now when out, everyone is obese and in leggings or sweatpants.
So sad. And I don’t blame cigarettes

That photo is of Pat Nixon? She was a model and probably slimmer than most women— her whole life.

She looks nasty. A walking skeleton is not healthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.

A photoshopped pap walk is not real life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange looking

+1

At a certain point it just looks sad.

"Sad" for whom? NK? She looks happy to me. "Sad" fo you? you don't know her why are your emotions so fragile?

I don't ever speculate on her anymore because she is so far gone and is someone who has 1. An enormous amounts of drive for recognition as an actor, her drive (which I suspect is largely driven by unhealthy factors) has been in place for decades. She was married to Tom Cruise, she knows all about using the media machine and she has wanted her career with a hunger that outpaces even the very hungry in Hollywood. So she changes her body to meet her perfectionistic standards. Yes she recreated a whole persona and face actually and has been doing so for years. So it extends into her body, no surprise there and nothing new at all in ny opinion. Just more of the same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.

I have to agree. She looks fine. I see a lot of old pictures from the 1920+ on my Fb newsfeed and women used to be thin. This was how average 20-30 something women looked. Granted, at 50 they weren’t quite as thin, but still WAY thinner than anything I see in public now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This photo was attached to an advertisement on another website I was just reading, and I thought immediately of this thread which I had visited this morning. Look at this grocery shopping mom from the 50s/60s - she's ANOREXIC!!





People's notions of what is a normal looking body is totally skewed by the 70% of overweight and obese fellow citizens we see around us every day - or maybe in the mirror.

Nicole Kidman isn't anorexic. She's not even underweight.

Agree. Whenever I see old pictures from even the 80s and earlier, the first thing I notice is how thin everyone was (and dressed nicely). Heathy thin, but would not be considered an anomaly. Now when out, everyone is obese and in leggings or sweatpants.
So sad. And I don’t blame cigarettes

The 80s is when Big Tobacco became Big Food, buying up most of the major brands and re-engineering processed foods with more and more added sugar to make it hyperpalatable while also 'low fat' to meet government dietary recommendations, and ensuring the customer base would not be able to keep from coming back over and over and over thanks to their growing dependency on refined sugar.

The rates of T2 diabetes in adults and children have been skyrocketing since, along with rates the overweight and obesity.

But yeah, there is something wrong with Nicole Kidman's lifestyle and weight. https://www.sportskeeda.com/health-and-fitness/what-nicole-kidman-s-workout-routine-helps-stay-fit

There is just so much processed food now, it is cheap, and so very convenient. So why in bother cooking? Stores are filled with real foods but people would rather by the crap they can just open and heat when they hit the door. Plus the Uber, door dash, delivery options are endless. People are lazy. If they don’t have to cook their own food out of necessity, they won’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This photo was attached to an advertisement on another website I was just reading, and I thought immediately of this thread which I had visited this morning. Look at this grocery shopping mom from the 50s/60s - she's ANOREXIC!!





People's notions of what is a normal looking body is totally skewed by the 70% of overweight and obese fellow citizens we see around us every day - or maybe in the mirror.

Nicole Kidman isn't anorexic. She's not even underweight.

Agree. Whenever I see old pictures from even the 80s and earlier, the first thing I notice is how thin everyone was (and dressed nicely). Heathy thin, but would not be considered an anomaly. Now when out, everyone is obese and in leggings or sweatpants.
So sad. And I don’t blame cigarettes

The 80s is when Big Tobacco became Big Food, buying up most of the major brands and re-engineering processed foods with more and more added sugar to make it hyperpalatable while also 'low fat' to meet government dietary recommendations, and ensuring the customer base would not be able to keep from coming back over and over and over thanks to their growing dependency on refined sugar.

The rates of T2 diabetes in adults and children have been skyrocketing since, along with rates the overweight and obesity.

But yeah, there is something wrong with Nicole Kidman's lifestyle and weight. https://www.sportskeeda.com/health-and-fitness/what-nicole-kidman-s-workout-routine-helps-stay-fit

Anonymous wrote:NK looks slender and healthy, this discussion is ridiculous.
10 days ago:

I'm just going to keep reposting this photo (I did not post it the first time) after every single nasty critical concern troll post about NK's weight.

She is nothing but healthy and you ladies have mental health issues.