Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High point-This is a school that really prepares kids for actionable careers. A friend sent their kid there and loved their experience.
The glossy brochures & catalogs they send us endlessly look cultish. Can’t even recycle as they are covered in plastic.
What does cultish mean?
Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
DH and I both top 15 LACs, older kid currently at a top 15 LAC, we spent 14 years living a mile from a top 15 LAC…and we were plenty impressed with Wooster. Lawrence is next on the list to visit.
DH and I both went to top 15 LACs and our child is currently at a different top 15 LAC. When we were looking at schools, we toured both Wooster and Lawrence. We were not impressed. There was not the same focus on academics as at the top schools. The admissions office was disorganized. We liked Appleton though. Our child thought Wooster was too heavy-handed with the sales job which turned him off. Of the more likely schools, St Olaf was our favorite.
Thank goodness your kid got into a top 15. The embarrassment you would have felt if they had to go to a Wooster or Lawrence type school would have been unbearable for you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
DH and I both top 15 LACs, older kid currently at a top 15 LAC, we spent 14 years living a mile from a top 15 LAC…and we were plenty impressed with Wooster. Lawrence is next on the list to visit.
DH and I both went to top 15 LACs and our child is currently at a different top 15 LAC. When we were looking at schools, we toured both Wooster and Lawrence. We were not impressed. There was not the same focus on academics as at the top schools. The admissions office was disorganized. We liked Appleton though. Our child thought Wooster was too heavy-handed with the sales job which turned him off. Of the more likely schools, St Olaf was our favorite.
Anonymous wrote:UMD from NOVA. A little merit puts it in line with the cost of UVA engineering in-state. UVA approaching 35% OOS and Tech with social justice makes admittance tough for a large number of kids.
Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is going to Minnesota
Even Brenda Walsh couldn’t stick it out at Minnesota.
Sorry, I’m GenX, raised in the south, and that’s literally the only thing I know about the University of Minnesota. I’m sure it’s lovely.
LOVE YOU!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is going to Minnesota
Even Brenda Walsh couldn’t stick it out at Minnesota.
Sorry, I’m GenX, raised in the south, and that’s literally the only thing I know about the University of Minnesota. I’m sure it’s lovely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
DH and I both top 15 LACs, older kid currently at a top 15 LAC, we spent 14 years living a mile from a top 15 LAC…and we were plenty impressed with Wooster. Lawrence is next on the list to visit.
Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
I've never seen people suggest these schools instead of the top 10-15 LACs. For high stats students, they could be safeties. For students who like the top SLACs but don't have the stats, these might be more likely options.
They are on the list for my high stat kid because they offer merit, and while we can’t afford 80k year, we do not qualify for need based aid. So, sadly those top 10-15 lac’s are not a reality for us and we are just doing the best we can.
+1. Good post
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
I've never seen people suggest these schools instead of the top 10-15 LACs. For high stats students, they could be safeties. For students who like the top SLACs but don't have the stats, these might be more likely options.
They are on the list for my high stat kid because they offer merit, and while we can’t afford 80k year, we do not qualify for need based aid. So, sadly those top 10-15 lac’s are not a reality for us and we are just doing the best we can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are impressed with places like Wooster and Lawrence and Muhlenberg do not have experience with top 10-15 LACs. They are fine schools but they just do not provide the same experience.
I've never seen people suggest these schools instead of the top 10-15 LACs. For high stats students, they could be safeties. For students who like the top SLACs but don't have the stats, these might be more likely options.