Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hoping to get a better picture of what some real niche or bespoke “hooks” actually look like?
Subject matters, interests or area of focus that are Not recruited athlete/ legacy/ donor/ child of faculty (or obv URM or FG).
Any examples this crowd can share?
Being a chess grandmaster (I have a little inside information on that).
Anonymous wrote:Hoping to get a better picture of what some real niche or bespoke “hooks” actually look like?
Subject matters, interests or area of focus that are Not recruited athlete/ legacy/ donor/ child of faculty (or obv URM or FG).
Any examples this crowd can share?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I consider full pay a hook.
At some schools, yes. Those that have to struggle to balance their budgets.
Anonymous wrote:I consider full pay a hook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
Disagree. I have seen where active military is definitely a hook.
I would think that military kids show that they can adjust in new environments and know how to get involved. They are usually not the kids who are 5 months into their freshman year and still having trouble making friends or getting into school activities. They are usually adaptable so I would think that’s a safe hook for a college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
They told you who took your kids seat?!?!?!
DP here - of course they didn't - OP wants to believe that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
Disagree. I have seen where active military is definitely a hook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
They told you who took your kids seat?!?!?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love how the breathless in here pretend that the Class of 2028 at every T20 will overflow with caricatures of the highest performer they can think of ... reminds me of a funny e-mail I received earlier this fall.
What it takes to be accepted to the following schools, if you bother listening to anyone else:
Stanford University: Reanimate the dead. Invent faster than light travel or time travel. Win the Fields Medal. Start Silicon Valley unicorn. Establish new proof of Fermat's Theorem. Become President or Vice President of the United States of America.
Ivy League: Cure cancer. Discover proof of extraterrestrial life. Win the Nobel Peace Prize. Become Head of State of a small country. Win an Oscar.
Top 20: Olympic athlete. Start a non-profit that raises a million dollars for charity. Publish original, peer-reviewed scientific research that solves a mystery of the universe. Win an Emmy.
State Flagship: Date Taylor Swift. Build an entire neighborhood by hand. Create a new element with a short half-life. Win a Grammy.
State School: Lead in school play. Varsity sports. Part-time job. Have a pulse.
It's just ... ugh ... the data is there ... it's not just kids with hooks that get into T20 schools without a 4.00 UWGPA + 20 AP exams scored at 5 + 1600/36 standardized test + multivariable calculus competed in utero. It's just not. It's unremarkable kids that go to school alongside our kids every day, and have a pretty basic, mundane existence, for the most part.
But if you listen to people, boy, I tell you ...
I disagree - went through this last year with a child who had a a 1590 on the SATS - all 5s on hardcore APS - Caclulcus BS, Physics, Chemistry, Biology - and got into a good school but not quite a few that I thought were obvious. And who did get into these schools? Legacies and athletes. Oh and newspaper editors. Do that!
Anonymous wrote:None of these talents are hooks. These talents and achievements are called spikes.
Hooks are something that you're born with and don't need to work on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
They told you who took your kids seat?!?!?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is being a military child a hook? Does the school make money for adding military kids?
No. Not at all. My military kid was passed over at an Ivy for a rural kid with lower stats. Both white UMC fwiw. I think they assume the other girl was less privileged but she was not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I consider full pay a hook.
Except it isn’t at need blind schools.
I suspect a fairly high percentage of students in the early application pools to private schools are full pay, which the admissions office probably knows.