Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meant DV claimed on 6/12/22 not 6/12/23.
He didn't let her leave the house. She took the opportunity that she had to file DV. I can't believe you are defending this monster.
Anonymous wrote:Meant DV claimed on 6/12/22 not 6/12/23.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.
We all know what the case was about except for you, you deluded MRA.
here’s a tip: even IF (and that’s a giant IF) Argote was being unfairly called abusive in court, he had every opportunity to prove himself. Courts do not enter permanent orders of no contacr without a lot of chances for the parent to show they are fit. Argote no doubt had many chances. But because he is a violent abuser, he chose violence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.
We all know what the case was about except for you, you deluded MRA.
here’s a tip: even IF (and that’s a giant IF) Argote was being unfairly called abusive in court, he had every opportunity to prove himself. Courts do not enter permanent orders of no contacr without a lot of chances for the parent to show they are fit. Argote no doubt had many chances. But because he is a violent abuser, he chose violence.
Anonymous wrote:red flag = Man files divorce on 6/6/22. Woman files domestic violence cliam on 6/12/23.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.Anonymous wrote:
Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/
What red flags? Where is the malpractice?
Anonymous wrote:Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.
red flag = Man files divorce on 6/6/22. Woman files domestic violence cliam on 6/12/23.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.Anonymous wrote:
Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/
What red flags? Where is the malpractice?
Anonymous wrote:Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.
Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.
Anonymous wrote:post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
post the transcripts and the pleadings.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.
The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.
+1
Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.
Anonymous wrote:where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL
Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV
So why did he still have a gun.
NO ONE protects women in this country.
They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.
SO SICK of this.
The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.