Anonymous wrote:You mean Genocide Joe?
Anonymous wrote:Average American annual salary is $60,000. In an area where a teardown costs $1 million, there are lots of sales where the broker is getting more than that. Shakedown. Total scam. Houses here practically sell themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Only 8% of realtors never went to college.
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/quick-real-estate-statistics
It’s not even about education. It’s about earning a years salary for most people in a weekend. Absurd.
They're real estate agents, not hedge fund managers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Only 8% of realtors never went to college.
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/quick-real-estate-statistics
It’s not even about education. It’s about earning a years salary for most people in a weekend. Absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Only 8% of realtors never went to college.
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/quick-real-estate-statistics
It’s not even about education. It’s about earning a years salary for most people in a weekend. Absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Only 8% of realtors never went to college.
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/quick-real-estate-statistics
It’s not even about education. It’s about earning a years salary for most people in a weekend. Absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Only 8% of realtors never went to college.
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/quick-real-estate-statistics
Anonymous wrote:GOOD. Realtors are over paid for doing almost nothing in this market. Most never even went to college and just studied and took the state test.
Anonymous wrote:The only thing that will happen if you untie the two fees is that buyers will lose free representation, and sellers will keep 2-3 percent more profit.
I think a good test case is the new construction industry. Because it is an industry where many buyers are already unrepresented. And speaking firsthand, you should see some of the horrible stuff builders get away with with unrepresented buyers or buyers represented by agents who are not knowledgeable about new construction.
In a new construction transaction in the DC area, if a buyer brings an agent to the transaction, the builder pays the commission for the Agent. Many times the agent is even able to offer a rebate to the buyer. Meanwhile, the builders around here, do not generally offer concessions to this buyers were not represented by agents.
I’m sure builders would absolutely love to do away with the model where the seller pays the buyers agent. So basically, the only buyers, who will bring real estate agents to the table are those buyers who can afford to bring real estate agents to the table. And unfortunately, those are the people who probably least need a real estate agent.
Do you really think that a builder is going to cut their sale price by two or 3%? They will not. They will price at the absolute highest at the market can bear. So, same sales price for them, higher profit because they are not paying agents. And buyer sees no benefit and has no representation unless they are willing to pay for it as they go.
I think the problem is the overall analysis assumes that it is due to agent fees that home sales prices are inflated. But really, all the commission does is take money out of the sellers net profits. There is not a one for one correlation between agent fees and Home prices. You can see it in the industry today. For sale by owners always insist on the comparable price. Are you really going to list your home as a for sale by owner and price at 3% less because you don’t have an agent? No, you’re obviously not. You’re going to list it at the highest comparable price and probably still insist that you are not going to pay the buyers agent.
This whole thing would be great for sellers, not good for homebuyers though
[E]specially homebuyers who are first timers, and do not know much about the process and don’t have cash on hand to hire an agent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is very needed. Other countries don’t have realtors that take 6%. I think there’s so many ways to reform this. In my mind, buyers should have to pay for it and it shouldn’t be allowed to roll into their mortgage. After all, you can’t roll moving costs into your mortgage.
Except they won't. So buyers will be unrepresented. This shit show is never going to happen so all of you agent haters can go pound sand.
You do know in many states like NY buyer and seller are required to have a lawyer. Real estate agents do not write up offers. NY calls that practicing law without a license. In NY realtors literally just get buyer. The lawyers do the work,
Spoken like a true idiot lawyer. The reason that top salespeople in all industries are among the highest-paid members of society is that "just getting buyers" is what makes the world go round. Filling out some nonsense paperwork that is the same in 99 cases out of 100 is in no way the "real work."
DP when I find the house I want to see and ask to see it then decide to buy it, exactly what are you doing for me? For $59,000 you write an offer that has me to waive an inspection, offer more than they’re asking and let the seller live in free for three months. What was worth $50,000 here? The key code to let me see the house???
It’s not 50k out of your pocket though. You paid nothing for whatever services you received.
?? it's built into the asking price for the house silly.
Is it though? If you sold your home without an agent, would you price it at 3 percent less?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is very needed. Other countries don’t have realtors that take 6%. I think there’s so many ways to reform this. In my mind, buyers should have to pay for it and it shouldn’t be allowed to roll into their mortgage. After all, you can’t roll moving costs into your mortgage.
Except they won't. So buyers will be unrepresented. This shit show is never going to happen so all of you agent haters can go pound sand.
You do know in many states like NY buyer and seller are required to have a lawyer. Real estate agents do not write up offers. NY calls that practicing law without a license. In NY realtors literally just get buyer. The lawyers do the work,
Spoken like a true idiot lawyer. The reason that top salespeople in all industries are among the highest-paid members of society is that "just getting buyers" is what makes the world go round. Filling out some nonsense paperwork that is the same in 99 cases out of 100 is in no way the "real work."
DP when I find the house I want to see and ask to see it then decide to buy it, exactly what are you doing for me? For $59,000 you write an offer that has me to waive an inspection, offer more than they’re asking and let the seller live in free for three months. What was worth $50,000 here? The key code to let me see the house???
It’s not 50k out of your pocket though. You paid nothing for whatever services you received.
?? it's built into the asking price for the house silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is very needed. Other countries don’t have realtors that take 6%. I think there’s so many ways to reform this. In my mind, buyers should have to pay for it and it shouldn’t be allowed to roll into their mortgage. After all, you can’t roll moving costs into your mortgage.
Except they won't. So buyers will be unrepresented. This shit show is never going to happen so all of you agent haters can go pound sand.
You do know in many states like NY buyer and seller are required to have a lawyer. Real estate agents do not write up offers. NY calls that practicing law without a license. In NY realtors literally just get buyer. The lawyers do the work,
Spoken like a true idiot lawyer. The reason that top salespeople in all industries are among the highest-paid members of society is that "just getting buyers" is what makes the world go round. Filling out some nonsense paperwork that is the same in 99 cases out of 100 is in no way the "real work."
DP when I find the house I want to see and ask to see it then decide to buy it, exactly what are you doing for me? For $59,000 you write an offer that has me to waive an inspection, offer more than they’re asking and let the seller live in free for three months. What was worth $50,000 here? The key code to let me see the house???
It’s not 50k out of your pocket though. You paid nothing for whatever services you received.