Anonymous wrote:That SSSA player would of been top 10 in the Class of 2026 Nationally. Poor kid tore ACL. Saw it on public social media.
Anonymous wrote:Agree on SjC depth. SJC doesn’t have depth and will struggle with subbing. Very strong/D1 24s, a few decent juniors, no 25 commits, a strong sophomore. You take any of their starters off the field, especially the middies, and they are going to struggle. I heard they have some new solid recruits, including a goalie transfer. It would be good to see them compete for a championship. It wasn’t until the last 3 years that they became a part of a conversation. The program has come a long way in a short time, but they have to figure some things out. They have a new assistant coach who may be able to help the head coach make better decisions and not get out coached when playing strong teams.
SR is loaded and feels like the front runner in the ISL. They are stacked with D1 commits and strong underclassman.
Anonymous wrote:What happened to SR?
Happened in first 10 min of game 1.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SR and Visi played a very close game. Both teams played well. It was SR’s 3rd game of the day and Visi’s first. SR didn’t have their starting goalies. Both very good teams, but SR appeared to have more depth for a full field game. We will see in the Spring. Indoor games nothing.
If indoor games mean nothing, how can tell anything about depth?
I guess if one team plays like 15 girls regularly and the other team like 10 regularly it would tell you about depth. Not rocket science.
So that explains why they lost the first two games too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SR and Visi played a very close game. Both teams played well. It was SR’s 3rd game of the day and Visi’s first. SR didn’t have their starting goalies. Both very good teams, but SR appeared to have more depth for a full field game. We will see in the Spring. Indoor games nothing.
If indoor games mean nothing, how can tell anything about depth?
I guess if one team plays like 15 girls regularly and the other team like 10 regularly it would tell you about depth. Not rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:How did they lose stud sophomore?
Anonymous wrote:How did they lose stud sophomore?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No dog in this fight, but Visi has stars and less depth and SR has slightly fewer stars offensively and lots of depth.
How is SSSAS looking?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SR and Visi played a very close game. Both teams played well. It was SR’s 3rd game of the day and Visi’s first. SR didn’t have their starting goalies. Both very good teams, but SR appeared to have more depth for a full field game. We will see in the Spring. Indoor games nothing.
If indoor games mean nothing, how can tell anything about depth?