Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's brutal for Tulane, which relies so heavily on ED. Who's going to ED to #73?
Kids who are full pay and good but not great students. Tulane has always been a respectable school for kids coming out of private school who couldn't get into Ivy league schools, top Slacs, or even desirable flagships. It will still be that
Don't kid yourself. Those are *exactly* the kinds of kids/families who care about these nonsense rankings. Both the size of Tulane's ED pool and its quality will decline noticeably this year.
They are exactly the kinds of families who won’t be sending their kids to a state school. You really believe people will now be sending their kids to Rutgers and Merced because IS News decided to promote public schools this year?
Nice strawman. Not Rutgers or Merced, but BC, BU, even Lehigh or Santa Clara instead of ED'ing Tulane? Absolutely.
If Tulane were content being a strong safety school, this wouldn't be such a big deal, but Tulane has been trying for years to claw its way into the legit-first-choice tier (largely with strategic use of ED smoke and mirrors), and this ranking is devastating to that effort.
yep, but kids currently EDing Tulane at the top privates are sub 3.5. The kids EDing Boston College are 3.7+. Lehigh is similar to BC. These kids with higher stats aren't going away or magically going to turn their ED into Rice or Hopkins. If the Tulane crowd bumps up their ED choice to higher schools then they're only going to hurt themselves.
The kids ED'ing to Tulane aren't a monolith. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but will ED to BC or BU this year because of the USNWR rankings. There absolutely are kids who would prefer Vandy but would have taken a much-closer-to-sure-thing ED at Tulane last year but will take the shot with Vandy this year because they just can't stomach ED'ing to #73. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but this year will sit out the ED1 round and instead will EA to UGA and the like this year--and ED2 to Tulane only if they don't get an offer they like better in the EA round. And kids who will ED1 to Vandy/similar and EA to UGA/similar. Etc. It'll add up to a smaller, weaker ED pool for Tulane.
Anonymous wrote:I admitedly don’t have my head in the new rankings nor changes in the methodology. But I read Vanderbilt’s statement with interest. If what they say is correct as to why their rank dropped, why wouldn’t the same have occurred to countless other smaller private colleges like Johns Hopkins and Emory? All the privates didn’t drop in rank, correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these posters insisting that the huge drop that Wake, Wash U and Tulane had in the rankings isn’t going to turn off applicants are kidding themselves. It was their high rankings that led to so many applications in recent years in the first place. Get real.
Can anyone think of a precedent? Ideally with ballpark similar starting points and drops in ranking. Also, ideally not due to not sending data to USNWR.
I see strong opinions going both ways, so would be interesting to have some empirical evidence. I guess we're about to see, unless perhaps schools start adjusting admissions or whatever to improve.
The only school that I can remember plummeting like this is Oberlin and they seem to still be getting the kind of students that they've always gotten
They plummeted again this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's brutal for Tulane, which relies so heavily on ED. Who's going to ED to #73?
Kids who are full pay and good but not great students. Tulane has always been a respectable school for kids coming out of private school who couldn't get into Ivy league schools, top Slacs, or even desirable flagships. It will still be that
Don't kid yourself. Those are *exactly* the kinds of kids/families who care about these nonsense rankings. Both the size of Tulane's ED pool and its quality will decline noticeably this year.
They are exactly the kinds of families who won’t be sending their kids to a state school. You really believe people will now be sending their kids to Rutgers and Merced because IS News decided to promote public schools this year?
Nice strawman. Not Rutgers or Merced, but BC, BU, even Lehigh or Santa Clara instead of ED'ing Tulane? Absolutely.
If Tulane were content being a strong safety school, this wouldn't be such a big deal, but Tulane has been trying for years to claw its way into the legit-first-choice tier (largely with strategic use of ED smoke and mirrors), and this ranking is devastating to that effort.
yep, but kids currently EDing Tulane at the top privates are sub 3.5. The kids EDing Boston College are 3.7+. Lehigh is similar to BC. These kids with higher stats aren't going away or magically going to turn their ED into Rice or Hopkins. If the Tulane crowd bumps up their ED choice to higher schools then they're only going to hurt themselves.
The kids ED'ing to Tulane aren't a monolith. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but will ED to BC or BU this year because of the USNWR rankings. There absolutely are kids who would prefer Vandy but would have taken a much-closer-to-sure-thing ED at Tulane last year but will take the shot with Vandy this year because they just can't stomach ED'ing to #73. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but this year will sit out the ED1 round and instead will EA to UGA and the like this year--and ED2 to Tulane only if they don't get an offer they like better in the EA round. And kids who will ED1 to Vandy/similar and EA to UGA/similar. Etc. It'll add up to a smaller, weaker ED pool for Tulane.
It isn’t as if Tulane was T10 last year, it was somewhere in the mid 40s. I just don’t think the new ranking is going to change the perception. You can’t imagine anyone applying to Tulane to begin with, and clearly hate the school with a passion, so aren’t well positioned to see why others might chose it. And I have no dog in this fight, no one on my family attends or has attended Tulane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the letter from Vanderbilt:
http://view.comms.vu.edu/?qs=ffde8b61400da34d1c6d4041de053bd1199e3e56308fe95b91f16c156d7184d115202fd1fada9f200c8be7e7476b059dfd6b2af5397cb3c830e7ab4fff9742383078f59133128165ba141edb0d8b5534
It lays out why the new rankings unfairly penalize smaller research universities, and why the methodology is so flawed. I’m not a Vandy alum, but I think this letter makes a lot of sense.
I think the letter is laughable. Who are we kidding? A school like Vanderbilt lamenting “privileged” big public schools?? Get real. UCLA and Berkeley ARE better.
Why ARE they better? Because US News declared them so this year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Wake is not really that popular in the first place anyways.
Quick Google says its acceptance rate was 25% in 2021 when it had only 5000+ students(probably little lower now)
Acceptance rate was around 20 percent in 2022 and below 20 percent this past year,
NE’s true acceptance rate looks to be around 25 percent. That’s based on the Bethesda Magazine data that looks at acceptances to all campuses/programs, not just the Boston start that NE publishes.
So Boston campus start was still extremely popular when it was only ranked in the mid to upper 40s.
Wake as a small/mid private T30 school was not popular. Looks like it's at the right place now.
Pretty sure any school in the T100 could become as popular as NE if they also offered an application with no supplemental essays and handed out large merit awards. Most schools don’t chose this route.
In any case, Wake had. been in the US News T30 for close to 30 years, it wasn’t gaming the rankings like Tulane and NE. It’s reputation is well established with employers and grad schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these posters insisting that the huge drop that Wake, Wash U and Tulane had in the rankings isn’t going to turn off applicants are kidding themselves. It was their high rankings that led to so many applications in recent years in the first place. Get real.
Can anyone think of a precedent? Ideally with ballpark similar starting points and drops in ranking. Also, ideally not due to not sending data to USNWR.
I see strong opinions going both ways, so would be interesting to have some empirical evidence. I guess we're about to see, unless perhaps schools start adjusting admissions or whatever to improve.
The only school that I can remember plummeting like this is Oberlin and they seem to still be getting the kind of students that they've always gotten
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the letter from Vanderbilt:
http://view.comms.vu.edu/?qs=ffde8b61400da34d1c6d4041de053bd1199e3e56308fe95b91f16c156d7184d115202fd1fada9f200c8be7e7476b059dfd6b2af5397cb3c830e7ab4fff9742383078f59133128165ba141edb0d8b5534
It lays out why the new rankings unfairly penalize smaller research universities, and why the methodology is so flawed. I’m not a Vandy alum, but I think this letter makes a lot of sense.
I think the letter is laughable. Who are we kidding? A school like Vanderbilt lamenting “privileged” big public schools?? Get real. UCLA and Berkeley ARE better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's brutal for Tulane, which relies so heavily on ED. Who's going to ED to #73?
Kids who are full pay and good but not great students. Tulane has always been a respectable school for kids coming out of private school who couldn't get into Ivy league schools, top Slacs, or even desirable flagships. It will still be that
Don't kid yourself. Those are *exactly* the kinds of kids/families who care about these nonsense rankings. Both the size of Tulane's ED pool and its quality will decline noticeably this year.
They are exactly the kinds of families who won’t be sending their kids to a state school. You really believe people will now be sending their kids to Rutgers and Merced because IS News decided to promote public schools this year?
Nice strawman. Not Rutgers or Merced, but BC, BU, even Lehigh or Santa Clara instead of ED'ing Tulane? Absolutely.
If Tulane were content being a strong safety school, this wouldn't be such a big deal, but Tulane has been trying for years to claw its way into the legit-first-choice tier (largely with strategic use of ED smoke and mirrors), and this ranking is devastating to that effort.
yep, but kids currently EDing Tulane at the top privates are sub 3.5. The kids EDing Boston College are 3.7+. Lehigh is similar to BC. These kids with higher stats aren't going away or magically going to turn their ED into Rice or Hopkins. If the Tulane crowd bumps up their ED choice to higher schools then they're only going to hurt themselves.
The kids ED'ing to Tulane aren't a monolith. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but will ED to BC or BU this year because of the USNWR rankings. There absolutely are kids who would prefer Vandy but would have taken a much-closer-to-sure-thing ED at Tulane last year but will take the shot with Vandy this year because they just can't stomach ED'ing to #73. There absolutely are kids who would have ED'd to Tulane last year but this year will sit out the ED1 round and instead will EA to UGA and the like this year--and ED2 to Tulane only if they don't get an offer they like better in the EA round. And kids who will ED1 to Vandy/similar and EA to UGA/similar. Etc. It'll add up to a smaller, weaker ED pool for Tulane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Wake is not really that popular in the first place anyways.
Quick Google says its acceptance rate was 25% in 2021 when it had only 5000+ students(probably little lower now)
Acceptance rate was around 20 percent in 2022 and below 20 percent this past year,
NE’s true acceptance rate looks to be around 25 percent. That’s based on the Bethesda Magazine data that looks at acceptances to all campuses/programs, not just the Boston start that NE publishes.
So Boston campus start was still extremely popular when it was only ranked in the mid to upper 40s.
Wake as a small/mid private T30 school was not popular. Looks like it's at the right place now.
Pretty sure any school in the T100 could become as popular as NE if they also offered an application with no supplemental essays and handed out large merit awards. Most schools don’t chose this route.
In any case, Wake had. been in the US News T30 for close to 30 years, it wasn’t gaming the rankings like Tulane and NE. It’s reputation is well established with employers and grad schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's brutal for Tulane, which relies so heavily on ED. Who's going to ED to #73?
Kids who are full pay and good but not great students. Tulane has always been a respectable school for kids coming out of private school who couldn't get into Ivy league schools, top Slacs, or even desirable flagships. It will still be that
Don't kid yourself. Those are *exactly* the kinds of kids/families who care about these nonsense rankings. Both the size of Tulane's ED pool and its quality will decline noticeably this year.
They are exactly the kinds of families who won’t be sending their kids to a state school. You really believe people will now be sending their kids to Rutgers and Merced because IS News decided to promote public schools this year?
Nice strawman. Not Rutgers or Merced, but BC, BU, even Lehigh or Santa Clara instead of ED'ing Tulane? Absolutely.
If Tulane were content being a strong safety school, this wouldn't be such a big deal, but Tulane has been trying for years to claw its way into the legit-first-choice tier (largely with strategic use of ED smoke and mirrors), and this ranking is devastating to that effort.
yep, but kids currently EDing Tulane at the top privates are sub 3.5. The kids EDing Boston College are 3.7+. Lehigh is similar to BC. These kids with higher stats aren't going away or magically going to turn their ED into Rice or Hopkins. If the Tulane crowd bumps up their ED choice to higher schools then they're only going to hurt themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Wake is not really that popular in the first place anyways.
Quick Google says its acceptance rate was 25% in 2021 when it had only 5000+ students(probably little lower now)
Acceptance rate was around 20 percent in 2022 and below 20 percent this past year,
NE’s true acceptance rate looks to be around 25 percent. That’s based on the Bethesda Magazine data that looks at acceptances to all campuses/programs, not just the Boston start that NE publishes.
So Boston campus start was still extremely popular when it was only ranked in the mid to upper 40s.
Wake as a small/mid private T30 school was not popular. Looks like it's at the right place now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Wake is not really that popular in the first place anyways.
Quick Google says its acceptance rate was 25% in 2021 when it had only 5000+ students(probably little lower now)
Acceptance rate was around 20 percent in 2022 and below 20 percent this past year,
NE’s true acceptance rate looks to be around 25 percent. That’s based on the Bethesda Magazine data that looks at acceptances to all campuses/programs, not just the Boston start that NE publishes.
Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Wake is not really that popular in the first place anyways.
Quick Google says its acceptance rate was 25% in 2021 when it had only 5000+ students(probably little lower now)