Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

+1 this exactly

Maybe it shouldn’t be so surprising that there is such a high rate of teen overdose death, if this is the mentality of the people raising teens today.

Ugh.

You can’t use narcan on a dead person or someone in cardiac arrest. Once you stop breathing, you have a few minutes before cardiac arrest. At that point, narcan isn’t helpful. Narcan is only helpful when someone is still breathing and heart is still beating. Think about where kids are doing drugs? Either at home in the basement at 3am or somewhere their parents (or someone else’s aren’t)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

+1 this exactly

Maybe it shouldn’t be so surprising that there is such a high rate of teen overdose death, if this is the mentality of the people raising teens today.

Ugh.

You can’t use narcan on a dead person or someone in cardiac arrest. Once you stop breathing, you have a few minutes before cardiac arrest. At that point, narcan isn’t helpful. Narcan is only helpful when someone is still breathing and heart is still beating. Think about where kids are doing drugs? Either at home in the basement at 3am or somewhere their parents (or someone else’s aren’t)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

+1 this exactly

Maybe it shouldn’t be so surprising that there is such a high rate of teen overdose death, if this is the mentality of the people raising teens today.

Ugh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

+1 this exactly

Maybe it shouldn’t be so surprising that there is such a high rate of teen overdose death, if this is the mentality of the people raising teens today.

Ugh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

+1 this exactly

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m going to buy it - two to keep with me and two for my teen.

I think parents who think only bad kids do drugs or that an overdose can happen only to kids who willingly do drugs ate extreme naive.

Fentanyl can be found anywhere.

Wasn’t there a police officer who accidentally overdose on the stuff after grabbing a handful of what he thought was MM’s during a raid?

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/30/1196343448/fentanyl-deaths-teens-schools-overdose#:~:text=Hourly%20News-,As%20teen%20fentanyl%20deaths%20rise%2C%20schools%20grapple%20with%20their%20role,urge%20education%20leaders%20to%20respond.


Even if your kid thinks he is just vaping, it can be laced with fentanyl.

Who would do that? Some seriously dumb cop. Buy your candy at a store!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a joke? Now we’re at the point where we have to have narcan handy? What’s happened to us?

+1. Sorry but no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ofc. Just like a fire extinguisher, an EpiPen, and the AED we put in the office. This is a standard first aid item.

Do you keep an AED and epipen both on you at all times and in your house?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If so, where do you keep it?
I was thinking of keeping it in each car's glove compartment.
My kids are typical "good" high schoolers but they do go out on the weekends.

Oh wow.
Our definitions are very different.
To me “good” assumes a basic expectation that you’re obeying the law.
Narcan is to counteract an opioid overdose. This is “going out on the weekends” for “good” kids??
What you described sounds like “risky” high schoolers.
Maybe my standards are just too high.

But that said, it sounds like you know your kids. So if you think you have a need to have Narcan in your cars, better safe than sorry.

+1 Even if my kids had it on hand only to revive other people, I would question why my "good" kids were regularly in proximity of people who abuse opioids. What new-fangled definition of "good" is this?

We do have a lot of DCUM posters, likely trolls, who always post things to the effect that all kids past the age of 11 are having sex, drinking and doing drugs and anyone who thinks their 11+ yo kid is not doing any of that is naive. OP is probably one of those, yet again.

+1 my kids aren’t going to be administering Narcan to anyone. They would have no idea if it was medically necessary. Leave that to real doctors please.

According to the training I took on how to administer Narcan, if the person you use it on has not taken an opiate it will not work nor do any harm.

This is correct. It won't. There's no danger or liability issue.

It doesn't matter. It is not my responsiblity. I will call 911 but, not do much more