Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give a man a fish vs teach them to fish.....
Why is it anyone's God given right to move to someone the wealthiest and most expensive areas of the country, have zero education, zero specialized skills, or zero useful anything, then complain about being poor and demanding they get to extract wealth from the area just because they exist?
I'm so sick and tired of the entitlement mentality from the left these days. They should just be honest and admit they to confiscate wealth and redistribute it for 'equity' purposes. Human beings will never, ever be equal, because some people are much smarter than others, some people will work a lot harder than others, other people will take on more risk than others to start a business. Why should the state redistribute wealth? People are never equal, and you don't deserve freebies just because you exist and breathe air. We will all be equal when we are all equally in the toilet and below mediocre while simultaneously destroying any motivation to create, innovate, and to work hard.
I'm sure handing out freebies helps with poverty. Handing out free cash also helps with inflation, gambling addictions, and idiots buying cars with $1000 per month payments too.
Right?
I only make 100k but I want to live in Greenwich, CT. Someone should subsidize me.
I make a little over 100k and can barely afford my own property taxes in Fairfax County, which are now up to fully10% of my net salary (yes, they were much lower when I bought my house). They’re only going up astronomically every year.
Who is going to subsidize me? It’s absurd and insulting that we will potentially be getting even more fleeced just so other people can get cash handouts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sorry, pal. You cannot guilt-shame people about being angry that their tax dollars - which they work hard for - are going to provide free money to people with no strings attached... and even to people who are present illegally. This is some crazy-ass stuff.
Would you feel better if this pilot program required recipients to pay money for the money? Or if the pilot program told the recipients what they had to spend the money on? How about Social Security - are you angry that your tax dollars, which you work hard for, are going to provide free money to people with no strings attached?
Anonymous wrote:Love how DCUM brings so many retrograde Reaganites out of the woodwork.
Cash transfers to low-income households are one of the best ways we have to fight poverty and improve the lives of the most vulnerable, especially children. Turns out giving money to impoverished people relieves poverty. What a concept!
Here’s one recent study finding that cash transfers are associated with reduced mortality among women and kids: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06116-2
Anonymous wrote:You're all right. Your custodians, childcare workers, public bus drivers, construction workers, food handlers, hospital staff, etc should all have to live hours outside of where they work.@@
You guys are so gross I can't even. Your premise is that low skilled workers you actually rely on do not get the same privilege as you (living where you work) because they are low skilled and poor?
Meanwhile, you enjoy the benefits of your property values and proximity while begrudging people living at near poverty level some quality of life.
ANd how do you manage this? By painting all poor people as drug addicts, gamblers, welfare queens, illegal immigrants, bad decision makers, and nameless faceless masses sucking your tax dollars away while refusing to see how YOU benefit from the tax structure in FFX county.
In other words, dehumanizing people while engaging in willful cognitive dissonance.
Anonymous wrote:
Sorry, pal. You cannot guilt-shame people about being angry that their tax dollars - which they work hard for - are going to provide free money to people with no strings attached... and even to people who are present illegally. This is some crazy-ass stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're all right. Your custodians, childcare workers, public bus drivers, construction workers, food handlers, hospital staff, etc should all have to live hours outside of where they work.@@
You guys are so gross I can't even. Your premise is that low skilled workers you actually rely on do not get the same privilege as you (living where you work) because they are low skilled and poor?
Meanwhile, you enjoy the benefits of your property values and proximity while begrudging people living at near poverty level some quality of life.
ANd how do you manage this? By painting all poor people as drug addicts, gamblers, welfare queens, illegal immigrants, bad decision makers, and nameless faceless masses sucking your tax dollars away while refusing to see how YOU benefit from the tax structure in FFX county.
In other words, dehumanizing people while engaging in willful cognitive dissonance.
Sorry, pal. You cannot guilt-shame people about being angry that their tax dollars - which they work hard for - are going to provide free money to people with no strings attached... and even to people who are present illegally. This is some crazy-ass stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give a man a fish vs teach them to fish.....
Why is it anyone's God given right to move to someone the wealthiest and most expensive areas of the country, have zero education, zero specialized skills, or zero useful anything, then complain about being poor and demanding they get to extract wealth from the area just because they exist?
I'm so sick and tired of the entitlement mentality from the left these days. They should just be honest and admit they to confiscate wealth and redistribute it for 'equity' purposes. Human beings will never, ever be equal, because some people are much smarter than others, some people will work a lot harder than others, other people will take on more risk than others to start a business. Why should the state redistribute wealth? People are never equal, and you don't deserve freebies just because you exist and breathe air. We will all be equal when we are all equally in the toilet and below mediocre while simultaneously destroying any motivation to create, innovate, and to work hard.
I'm sure handing out freebies helps with poverty. Handing out free cash also helps with inflation, gambling addictions, and idiots buying cars with $1000 per month payments too.
Right?
I only make 100k but I want to live in Greenwich, CT. Someone should subsidize me.
I make a little over 100k and can barely afford my own property taxes in Fairfax County, which are now up to fully10% of my net salary (yes, they were much lower when I bought my house). They’re only going up astronomically every year.
Who is going to subsidize me? It’s absurd and insulting that we will potentially be getting even more fleeced just so other people can get cash handouts.
Anonymous wrote:You're all right. Your custodians, childcare workers, public bus drivers, construction workers, food handlers, hospital staff, etc should all have to live hours outside of where they work.@@
You guys are so gross I can't even. Your premise is that low skilled workers you actually rely on do not get the same privilege as you (living where you work) because they are low skilled and poor?
Meanwhile, you enjoy the benefits of your property values and proximity while begrudging people living at near poverty level some quality of life.
ANd how do you manage this? By painting all poor people as drug addicts, gamblers, welfare queens, illegal immigrants, bad decision makers, and nameless faceless masses sucking your tax dollars away while refusing to see how YOU benefit from the tax structure in FFX county.
In other words, dehumanizing people while engaging in willful cognitive dissonance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give a man a fish vs teach them to fish.....
Why is it anyone's God given right to move to someone the wealthiest and most expensive areas of the country, have zero education, zero specialized skills, or zero useful anything, then complain about being poor and demanding they get to extract wealth from the area just because they exist?
I'm so sick and tired of the entitlement mentality from the left these days. They should just be honest and admit they to confiscate wealth and redistribute it for 'equity' purposes. Human beings will never, ever be equal, because some people are much smarter than others, some people will work a lot harder than others, other people will take on more risk than others to start a business. Why should the state redistribute wealth? People are never equal, and you don't deserve freebies just because you exist and breathe air. We will all be equal when we are all equally in the toilet and below mediocre while simultaneously destroying any motivation to create, innovate, and to work hard.
I'm sure handing out freebies helps with poverty. Handing out free cash also helps with inflation, gambling addictions, and idiots buying cars with $1000 per month payments too.
Right?
I only make 100k but I want to live in Greenwich, CT. Someone should subsidize me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And this is why songs like rich men north of richmond are so popular.
Except the songwriter says the songs are for poor people, not conservatives.
In an interview with the Free Press following the overnight success of his viral so-called blue-collar anthem, the country singer said he hopes his music will inspire listeners to stop relying “on someone 150 or 500 miles away from them to solve their problems.”
“Nobody in Washington, DC, no one in the federal government’s coming to save us,” he said, according to a clip posted to X, formerly known as Twitter.
“The people that are going to save us are each other.”
Anonymous wrote:And this is why songs like rich men north of richmond are so popular.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was on welfare after I left my former husband, and had two kids under three. An extra $750 a month would have been life changing.
Happy to report that like most welfare recipients, I was off the doles after a couple of years. I am all for this.
Great! You pay for it. Send your check to FFX county.
That’s not how taxes work. Taxpayers don’t get a line item veto. There are plenty of things I’d rather not spend public dollars on, but I still gladly pay my taxes because that’s how government works. Chalk it up as a cost of living in civil society.
+1
Do people get this up in arms about the billions of dollars of taxpayer money that go toward corporate subsidies? And the fact that major corporations take pains to avoid paying taxes?
Not to mention the multiple major bank bailouts that have happened in our lifetime.
Anonymous wrote:I know of two women (on Maryland benefits) who flew to Miami to get BBL's. These cost $6000 in advance.
If people on benefits can prepay for plastic surgery I think the money is better spent elsewherr.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know of two women (on Maryland benefits) who flew to Miami to get BBL's. These cost $6000 in advance.
If people on benefits can prepay for plastic surgery I think the money is better spent elsewherr.
No, those women are clearly doing something illegal. However, don't use anecdotes. The vast majority of people do not do this.