Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My father is a retired big law partner, and when my moms parents, who lived nearby, were dying, he was there with her, and my grandparents, who loved him, as much as he could be. Your friends husband sounds like a d*ck.
OP here. I should have known that DCUM would twist what I said into a slam on my friend. I feel for her and think he's a jerk. But that doesn't put food on the table nor does it keep her in the house.
That's the key phrase: "as much as he could be". But what if, like my friend, the wife demands more than what the DH can give. Law partners have deals to get done or need to take a case to trial; doctors have research to conduct and patients to treat.
You can't say "sorry your Honor, my wife is having trouble dealing with her Dad passing away over six months ago so I can't take the case to trial and I need a continuance". Or "sorry Stage IV Cancer patient, my wife spent the morning crying so I wasn't able to design your drug regimen yet". We like to talk in ideals, but the world is complicated. That's what I was trying to explain to my friend, because holding her husband to her standard of what her husband SHOULD be, when he brings in so much money. Why push him to the point where he wants to take away your health insurance, your time with the kids, your ability to live in your beautiful house? Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I got involved in supporting DH's business venture. I didn't believe in it at first (concept is selling t-shirts as t-shorts, sporty pants) but he says it's getting a lot of start-up investor interest. The launch date has gone from the 12th of Never to mid November, lol. Anyhoo becoming involved in the business has really elevated my appearance and all round confidence. I'm all round confident, but not all round. lol. Lost 4 lbs in the last 7 months. Thank me later.
Yes, working will do that. You should make sure you are getting paid on the books and listed as co-owner, not donating your labor.
PP, thank you for engaging with me. (Let's get engaged! lol.) But seriously I will bring those subjects up with DH. He says a lot investors are excited about t-shorts. It was my idea (eye-dia?) to call the head hole the cool breeze portal and apparently everyone DH pitches on it loves it. You put your legs through through the armholes and the portal keeps you cool, which in this weather, is not a bad thing lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I got involved in supporting DH's business venture. I didn't believe in it at first (concept is selling t-shirts as t-shorts, sporty pants) but he says it's getting a lot of start-up investor interest. The launch date has gone from the 12th of Never to mid November, lol. Anyhoo becoming involved in the business has really elevated my appearance and all round confidence. I'm all round confident, but not all round. lol. Lost 4 lbs in the last 7 months. Thank me later.
Yes, working will do that. You should make sure you are getting paid on the books and listed as co-owner, not donating your labor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man who marries his mistress creates a job vacancy OP. You can’t say you haven’t been shown the kind of man this dude is.
She’ll still have the house and the kids and the insurance if he’s as keen as you say on keeping up the idea it was mutual. Not to worry.
Nope. Selling the house next year. Custody is 50-50, though I imagine my friend will wind up more at 65-35 given his work conferences and other obligations. He most certainly can drop her from his insurance and make her get Obamacare or whatever dinky insurance her eventual employer provides.
^^ Like this post makes sense if it is the OP DH sock puppeting that he’s gonna drop her from insurance and make her get dinky healthcare - for the mother of his own children. Blimey.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I wrote about this thread today in my daily blog post:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/weblog/2023/07/25/update072523
Some of you may find what I have to say to be interesting.
I would love to hear more about your discovery process - patterns to this person's other posts that made you think it was the husband rather than the friend?
Honestly these posts are kind of the highlight of DCUM for me now. Thank you for doing them.
I don't want to comment on that but I think that if you re-read the OP's posts with the view that he is the husband, everything makes a lot more sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am a BigLaw partner and recently had practice group chair complain to me that another partner in group was not engaged because his spouse was overly demanding on emotional issues related to a death in her family (like OP's post, the death had occurred at least six months prior). In my experience, the business world is understanding during a crisis event like a terminal illness, sudden death, etc. but has little patience thereafter, especially if the employee is NOT the directly affected person.
So true. People don't like to hear it but op's post is reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man who marries his mistress creates a job vacancy OP. You can’t say you haven’t been shown the kind of man this dude is.
She’ll still have the house and the kids and the insurance if he’s as keen as you say on keeping up the idea it was mutual. Not to worry.
Nope. Selling the house next year. Custody is 50-50, though I imagine my friend will wind up more at 65-35 given his work conferences and other obligations. He most certainly can drop her from his insurance and make her get Obamacare or whatever dinky insurance her eventual employer provides.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I wrote about this thread today in my daily blog post:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/weblog/2023/07/25/update072523
Some of you may find what I have to say to be interesting.
I would love to hear more about your discovery process - patterns to this person's other posts that made you think it was the husband rather than the friend?
Honestly these posts are kind of the highlight of DCUM for me now. Thank you for doing them.
Anonymous wrote:Am a BigLaw partner and recently had practice group chair complain to me that another partner in group was not engaged because his spouse was overly demanding on emotional issues related to a death in her family (like OP's post, the death had occurred at least six months prior). In my experience, the business world is understanding during a crisis event like a terminal illness, sudden death, etc. but has little patience thereafter, especially if the employee is NOT the directly affected person.
jsteele wrote:I wrote about this thread today in my daily blog post:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/weblog/2023/07/25/update072523
Some of you may find what I have to say to be interesting.
Anonymous wrote:These scenarios happen all the time. Make your own money.