Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The anti-littles poster.
The littles poster who think only one person is annoyed by her use of the term "littles".
+1.
I’d also like to add: people who can’t seem to understand when more than one person are disagreeing with them, so they accuse others of sockpuppeting or being the OP posting yet again or something. Just accept that people don’t agree with you. It’s not a conspiracy or trolling, really.
Yes to this.
The littles posters also seem to not understand that the anonymous nature of DCUM means that using cutesy language is always going to be less well received than it might be in a text to friends or when posting on Facebook. Those people know you, and may either share your affection for these terms or simply be willing to overlook it because they know and like you.
On DCUM, you are what you post. When you post comments about your kids and refer to them as "littles", other posters know nothing else about you, and you come off to a lot of people as unserious, twee, and a little dumb.
The lack of self awareness there is almost as annoying as the terms themselves.
Case in point - another post by the anti little poster
Case in point - another post assuming that everyone who disagrees with them is the same poster 😂
You are unhinged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Posters who totally invent additional details or hidden meanings. They will twist and extrapolate and do anything other than take the OP at face value, and offer advice or solutions for the actual problem or question or vent at hand.
x10000000
X20000000. What is the bizarre obsession on DCUM with blaming the OP under any and all circumstances?
OP: “I just found out my husband is an axe murderer. What do I do?”
DCUM: “I mean, are you giving him enough sex? Do you allow him to take the kids on his murder sprees, not feed them and leave them alone in the car for 12 hours on the iPad, or do you insist he parent like you do, because you think yours is the right way???”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The anti-littles poster.
The littles poster who think only one person is annoyed by her use of the term "littles".
+1.
I’d also like to add: people who can’t seem to understand when more than one person are disagreeing with them, so they accuse others of sockpuppeting or being the OP posting yet again or something. Just accept that people don’t agree with you. It’s not a conspiracy or trolling, really.
Yes to this.
The littles posters also seem to not understand that the anonymous nature of DCUM means that using cutesy language is always going to be less well received than it might be in a text to friends or when posting on Facebook. Those people know you, and may either share your affection for these terms or simply be willing to overlook it because they know and like you.
On DCUM, you are what you post. When you post comments about your kids and refer to them as "littles", other posters know nothing else about you, and you come off to a lot of people as unserious, twee, and a little dumb.
The lack of self awareness there is almost as annoying as the terms themselves.
Case in point - another post by the anti little poster
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Posters who totally invent additional details or hidden meanings. They will twist and extrapolate and do anything other than take the OP at face value, and offer advice or solutions for the actual problem or question or vent at hand.
x10000000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Posters who totally invent additional details or hidden meanings. They will twist and extrapolate and do anything other than take the OP at face value, and offer advice or solutions for the actual problem or question or vent at hand.
x10000000
I feel like all these posters are women who had angry, bitter mothers that blamed them for everything. As a result, they just want to berate and judge and are absolutely uninterested in nuance or even fully reading the OP’s question/post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about the mean person who keeps starting these threads to make fun of others?
This is really a good point. some miserable creature lives for DCUM and lives to make fun of it. She is so devalued in herself that she s enjoys mocking other anonymous people.
DP but I make fun of people in real life too! No worries there.
Anonymous wrote:The PR conspiracy lady. Anyone who mentions a product, celebrity, tv show or movie in a positive context is part of their PR team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The anti-littles poster.
The littles poster who think only one person is annoyed by her use of the term "littles".
+1.
I’d also like to add: people who can’t seem to understand when more than one person are disagreeing with them, so they accuse others of sockpuppeting or being the OP posting yet again or something. Just accept that people don’t agree with you. It’s not a conspiracy or trolling, really.
Anonymous wrote:“The plural of anecdote is not data” poster
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those women who always want to date the top 1 percent of men who are 6 feet or taller and make at least 500k but have no career, average looking, materialistic, and don't want to work for their money.
You mean the SATC lifestyle? Thank SJP for romanticizing it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those women who always want to date the top 1 percent of men who are 6 feet or taller and make at least 500k but have no career, average looking, materialistic, and don't want to work for their money.
You mean the SATC lifestyle? Thank SJP for romanticizing it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Posters who totally invent additional details or hidden meanings. They will twist and extrapolate and do anything other than take the OP at face value, and offer advice or solutions for the actual problem or question or vent at hand.
x10000000
I feel like all these posters are women who had angry, bitter mothers that blamed them for everything. As a result, they just want to berate and judge and are absolutely uninterested in nuance or even fully reading the OP’s question/post.
Anonymous wrote:Those women who always want to date the top 1 percent of men who are 6 feet or taller and make at least 500k but have no career, average looking, materialistic, and don't want to work for their money.
Anonymous wrote:Those women who always want to date the top 1 percent of men who are 6 feet or taller and make at least 500k but have no career, average looking, materialistic, and don't want to work for their money.