Anonymous wrote:Would Hunter even go to the White House? Or even need to pass through that checkpoint?
Just seems it would be easier for them to meet up in Rehoboth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Hunter even go to the White House? Or even need to pass through that checkpoint?
Just seems it would be easier for them to meet up in Rehoboth.
I was wondering this too. This was a checkpoint for staffs d visitors. I doubt the president and his immediate family are required to go through security checkpoints. Does the SS frisk Jill every night before bed? Seems unlikely.
Anonymous wrote:Would Hunter even go to the White House? Or even need to pass through that checkpoint?
Just seems it would be easier for them to meet up in Rehoboth.
Anonymous wrote:Has Hunter Biden been to rehab lately?
I didn’t think so. Me thinks the entire WH knows who has a coke addiction. But let’s not point fingers here. Democrats are untouchable.
Anonymous wrote:Trump says Secret Service found who brought cocaine into the White House and claims agency 'knows everything'..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.
By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.
By what calculus is that? Hundreds of people pass through that entrance. It wasn't "actually naming HB" - it was inability to pin down which of the hundreds it could have been.
It is not hundreds, it maybe a hundred. They all have names and SS has the list of people who were there during a certain period of time. Even if there is no fingerprints, no DNA (which is very plausible), and no video recording (highly unlikely), it is easy to go through the list of those names, narrow it down to dozen, interview them, and search warrant if needed, and they would have a name. By not disclosing that name, they named HB.
Anonymous wrote:The Biden administration that tells you that they don't know how a bag of cocaine got into the most secure building in the entire country is the same regime that wants you to trust them with the security of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Would Hunter even go to the White House? Or even need to pass through that checkpoint?
Just seems it would be easier for them to meet up in Rehoboth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.
By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.
By what calculus is that? Hundreds of people pass through that entrance. It wasn't "actually naming HB" - it was inability to pin down which of the hundreds it could have been.
It is not hundreds, it maybe a hundred. They all have names and SS has the list of people who were there during a certain period of time. Even if there is no fingerprints, no DNA (which is very plausible), and no video recording (highly unlikely), it is easy to go through the list of those names, narrow it down to dozen, interview them, and search warrant if needed, and they would have a name. By not disclosing that name, they named HB.