Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This poster sounds like they are doing their homework to understand reality as opposed to a fantasy presented by the coach that stem degrees are able to be pursued and that lots of athletes do so.
Nobody said lots of athletes do it, not even the coach.
Lots of non athlete STEM majors also change degrees.
If the student wants to do it and is smart enough they can do it.
But the reality is OPs son might find STEM in college too hard, athlete or not.
This was flatly not true at Yale for physics. Profs said “Miss labs and you fail.” Coach said “Miss practice or a game and you’re off the team.” That’s the simple reality at many schools.
Anonymous wrote:I have known people who were admitted to UVa in Engineering and had a full athletic scholarship. Coaches leaned hard on them throughout 1st semester over missing practices to attend mandatory lab classes. In the end, each transferred into Arts & Sciences and picked an easy major there. None ended up in professional sports, btw.
Engineering or Nursing are different enough that its very very hard to play non-club sports and still graduate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mastodon]iAnonymous wrote:Golf?
Yep 6-7 players on team gotta be it
I’m guessing cross country. Regardless of sport, have your kid try balancing both. If it’s too much, academics come first. But he shouldn’t quit the team before he even starts.
One of the very top XC/TF high school girls in the country did that a few years ago. Got admission to an Ivy & never ran a step again.
Anonymous wrote:Went to Duke on athletic scholarship 40 years ago. The coach and the AD (not friendly to athletes generally) absolutely supported stem degrees, even if labs interfered with practice. The department would use its influence to get another scheduled class if available, but if the lab was needed, it was needed, even if an athlete arrived at practice late. I have no idea what happens today. There was a lot not to like at Duke, but the focus on academics in the athletic department was very desirable. A credit to the school.
bAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This poster sounds like they are doing their homework to understand reality as opposed to a fantasy presented by the coach that stem degrees are able to be pursued and that lots of athletes do so.
I see tons of stem degrees pursued by athletes at top schools all the time.
Source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This poster sounds like they are doing their homework to understand reality as opposed to a fantasy presented by the coach that stem degrees are able to be pursued and that lots of athletes do so.
Nobody said lots of athletes do it, not even the coach.
Lots of non athlete STEM majors also change degrees.
If the student wants to do it and is smart enough they can do it.
But the reality is OPs son might find STEM in college too hard, athlete or not.
This was flatly not true at Yale for physics. Profs said “Miss labs and you fail.” Coach said “Miss practice or a game and you’re off the team.” That’s the simple reality at many schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This poster sounds like they are doing their homework to understand reality as opposed to a fantasy presented by the coach that stem degrees are able to be pursued and that lots of athletes do so.
Nobody said lots of athletes do it, not even the coach.
Lots of non athlete STEM majors also change degrees.
If the student wants to do it and is smart enough they can do it.
But the reality is OPs son might find STEM in college too hard, athlete or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This poster sounds like they are doing their homework to understand reality as opposed to a fantasy presented by the coach that stem degrees are able to be pursued and that lots of athletes do so.
I see tons of stem degrees pursued by athletes at top schools all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this men's golf?
If so, it would pose an interesting dilemma as "golf" is one of the best business majors for getting a great job.