Anonymous wrote:I know two Harvard law grads. One got his bachelors at Harvard, the other at Loyola Chicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
+1
Law school admissions post-2008 are way less competitive than they used to be.
This is completely wrong. Just google the blog by Mike Spivey, the biggest law school admissions counselor. Two years ago was one of the toughest ever, last year and this year only slightly less so.
A 175 LSAT is the new 170. Everyone has a 3.9 GPA thanks to grade inflation during Covid.
And 2008 has little to do with anything. 25-year-olds applying to law school this year were 10 years old in 2008. Most of them didn’t have mortgages back then
I don’t think you know anything about the changes in the legal job market since 2008.
You’re right! But I’m not sure you know very much about the current state of law school admissions. Do you think fewer kids are applying to law school today because of changes in the hiring market? Unfortunately, that’s not the case
Here’s what the leading law school admissions consultant has to say:
https://www.spiveyconsulting.com/blog-post/thoughts-data-on-2020-2021-cycle/
Not pp but there was indeed a big dip in apps from 2008-2019.
But a huge surge during covid. New grads couldn't find jobs to applied to law school en masse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
+1
Law school admissions post-2008 are way less competitive than they used to be.
This is completely wrong. Just google the blog by Mike Spivey, the biggest law school admissions counselor. Two years ago was one of the toughest ever, last year and this year only slightly less so.
A 175 LSAT is the new 170. Everyone has a 3.9 GPA thanks to grade inflation during Covid.
And 2008 has little to do with anything. 25-year-olds applying to law school this year were 10 years old in 2008. Most of them didn’t have mortgages back then
I don’t think you know anything about the changes in the legal job market since 2008.
You’re right! But I’m not sure you know very much about the current state of law school admissions. Do you think fewer kids are applying to law school today because of changes in the hiring market? Unfortunately, that’s not the case
Here’s what the leading law school admissions consultant has to say:
https://www.spiveyconsulting.com/blog-post/thoughts-data-on-2020-2021-cycle/
Not pp but there was indeed a big dip in apps from 2008-2019.
Anonymous wrote:Why is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
Anonymous wrote:You are basically telling us you don’t know many Harvard law school grads…good to know
Anonymous wrote:Elite professional schools love to brag about how they have students from 200 different colleges all over the US. What they don’t say is that the majority of their student bodies attended elite undergraduate schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this just means there are a lot of really great undergraduate programs you’ve never heard of.
I mean, just because you’ve never heard of Kenyon or Waterloo doesn’t mean anything about Harvard. It just says your world is pretty small.
You can see google this. Are these really unfamiliar names?
https://hls.harvard.edu/jdadmissions/apply-to-harvard-law-school/jdapplicants/hls-profile-and-facts/undergraduate-institutions/
I think OP is talking about places like Austin College & Bloomsburg University (my aunt went there!).
Anonymous wrote:HLS grad here. I graduated first in my class in the mid-90s from a tiny college nobody had heard of and did well on the LSAT. There were many others like me in my class. There were many Ivy grads too. I am sure this is still the case today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
+1
Law school admissions post-2008 are way less competitive than they used to be.
This is completely wrong. Just google the blog by Mike Spivey, the biggest law school admissions counselor. Two years ago was one of the toughest ever, last year and this year only slightly less so.
A 175 LSAT is the new 170. Everyone has a 3.9 GPA thanks to grade inflation during Covid.
And 2008 has little to do with anything. 25-year-olds applying to law school this year were 10 years old in 2008. Most of them didn’t have mortgages back then
I don’t think you know anything about the changes in the legal job market since 2008.
You’re right! But I’m not sure you know very much about the current state of law school admissions. Do you think fewer kids are applying to law school today because of changes in the hiring market? Unfortunately, that’s not the case
Here’s what the leading law school admissions consultant has to say:
https://www.spiveyconsulting.com/blog-post/thoughts-data-on-2020-2021-cycle/
Anonymous wrote:Why is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
+1
Law school admissions post-2008 are way less competitive than they used to be.
This is completely wrong. Just google the blog by Mike Spivey, the biggest law school admissions counselor. Two years ago was one of the toughest ever, last year and this year only slightly less so.
A 175 LSAT is the new 170. Everyone has a 3.9 GPA thanks to grade inflation during Covid.
And 2008 has little to do with anything. 25-year-olds applying to law school this year were 10 years old in 2008. Most of them didn’t have mortgages back then
I don’t think you know anything about the changes in the legal job market since 2008.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this just means there are a lot of really great undergraduate programs you’ve never heard of.
I mean, just because you’ve never heard of Kenyon or Waterloo doesn’t mean anything about Harvard. It just says your world is pretty small.
You can see google this. Are these really unfamiliar names?
https://hls.harvard.edu/jdadmissions/apply-to-harvard-law-school/jdapplicants/hls-profile-and-facts/undergraduate-institutions/
Also, Creighton, multiple Cal State campuses, multiple CUNY campuses, Patrick Henry, Dillard…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know HLS grads who went to Harvard undergrad. And I know HLS grads who went to undergrad at TCU and UK (as in, the University of Kentucky) and SCU. Oh, and Lake Forest College, though he was old (and kind of a jerk TBH).
There is a continuum. If your undergrad is in the top 100 ish, or is your state flagship, you are in good shape as far as undergrad institution. You don't need a top 30. You do need a high GPA.
If someone theoretically had a perfect GPA & LSAT and was at an undergrad ranked #300, I’m sure they’d have good law school options.
But not Harvard. And major would matter, too. A dance major from App State with a 4.0 is not going to Harvard Law.
Yes they are if they have a 179 LSAT.
No really, it’s not that simple. This is one of the big lies repeated on this board. They have a chance, yes. But stop telling people that a high lsat is all you need. Maybe this was true 20 or 40 years ago but it is absolutely not the case now.
I know a dual math and history major with a 4.0 in each degree, stellar recs, internships, ECs, leadership positions, and awards with a 175 who didn’t break top 10.
+1
Law school admissions post-2008 are way less competitive than they used to be.
This is completely wrong. Just google the blog by Mike Spivey, the biggest law school admissions counselor. Two years ago was one of the toughest ever, last year and this year only slightly less so.
A 175 LSAT is the new 170. Everyone has a 3.9 GPA thanks to grade inflation during Covid.
And 2008 has little to do with anything. 25-year-olds applying to law school this year were 10 years old in 2008. Most of them didn’t have mortgages back then