Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Well, most people understand that talkative, silly kids can be very disruptive for kids trying to learn. Which is the purpose of school. Some of you are the worst. No wonder the kids are so ill-behaved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ummm yeah if a kid is talking in line - I definitely tell them to go to the back of the line. They hate that because they line up with their friends. Its not humiliation - its "helping" them behave better by getting them away from the person they were talking to.[/quote
I remember when parents would thanks us when their kids got in trouble...
Telling the child to go to the back of the line( because, (‘they were sick of telling them) in front of the child’s peers, is not ok. OP said that her child is now feeling that she is being treated differently, and that is not how a child needs to feel in elementary school. The teacher lost her cool and lashed out in a snarky unprofessional way. Maybe she should have told her privately and as pp suggested- involve her in a solution. Not sure I read that they were walking in the halls while other classes were in session. Children are happy to be in school, with nice weather, looking forward to summer break. She did not hit or push anyone. Maybe the punishment should fit the “crime”, minus the teacher’s intent to shame.
My opinion.
There is so much idiocy here I don't know where to begin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ummm yeah if a kid is talking in line - I definitely tell them to go to the back of the line. They hate that because they line up with their friends. Its not humiliation - its "helping" them behave better by getting them away from the person they were talking to.[/quote
I remember when parents would thanks us when their kids got in trouble...
Telling the child to go to the back of the line( because, (‘they were sick of telling them) in front of the child’s peers, is not ok. OP said that her child is now feeling that she is being treated differently, and that is not how a child needs to feel in elementary school. The teacher lost her cool and lashed out in a snarky unprofessional way. Maybe she should have told her privately and as pp suggested- involve her in a solution. Not sure I read that they were walking in the halls while other classes were in session. Children are happy to be in school, with nice weather, looking forward to summer break. She did not hit or push anyone. Maybe the punishment should fit the “crime”, minus the teacher’s intent to shame.
My opinion.
No, it is completely okay. I am sick of parents like you who think children should never feel shame. Shame in the appropriate context is an important social lesson and your kids will survive it. And they will remember it. Clearly OP's kid was a repeat offender and completely disrespectful to her teacher and her peers. This was totally appropriate and there is no need for private consult. That is total BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Well, most people understand that talkative, silly kids can be very disruptive for kids trying to learn. Which is the purpose of school. Some of you are the worst. No wonder the kids are so ill-behaved.
Some of you indeed, like you pp, are the worst.
As for the purpose of school? If you read, at all, the purpose is many.
Making sure kids are fed health food fore breakfast, lunch, and bags to take home weekends.
Keeping them safe.
Learning is academic, yet also social emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Well, most people understand that talkative, silly kids can be very disruptive for kids trying to learn. Which is the purpose of school. Some of you are the worst. No wonder the kids are so ill-behaved.
Some of you indeed, like you pp, are the worst.
As for the purpose of school? If you read, at all, the purpose is many.
Making sure kids are fed health food fore breakfast, lunch, and bags to take home weekends.
Keeping them safe.
Learning is academic, yet also social emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Well, most people understand that talkative, silly kids can be very disruptive for kids trying to learn. Which is the purpose of school. Some of you are the worst. No wonder the kids are so ill-behaved.
Some of you indeed, like you pp, are the worst.
As for the purpose of school? If you read, at all, the purpose is many.
Making sure kids are fed health food fore breakfast, lunch, and bags to take home weekends.
Keeping them safe.
Learning is academic, yet also social emotional.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Had taken that approach, but it seems like a rather severe immutable punishment for...talking in the hallways. If a child punches someone, which most would agree is a far more serious behavioral matter, are they given 3 months of daily punishment?
DD says they feel some kids are now treating them differently due to this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Well, most people understand that talkative, silly kids can be very disruptive for kids trying to learn. Which is the purpose of school. Some of you are the worst. No wonder the kids are so ill-behaved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Had taken that approach, but it seems like a rather severe immutable punishment for...talking in the hallways. If a child punches someone, which most would agree is a far more serious behavioral matter, are they given 3 months of daily punishment?
DD says they feel some kids are now treating them differently due to this.
It's not 3 months. The school year is over in 6 weeks. It's also not that bad of a punishment. The appropriate punishment for talking is to separate her from the people she's talking with. The teacher did that.
Not OP.
Sure it is. Her DD now has the Scarlet Letter every single time they line up.
And yes, my kid would have volunteered to be the caboose, thinking it or the "lead" were the 2 cool positions. Shut the classroom door, turn off the lights, make sure everyone is out. The teacher could have formulated this in a positive manner instead of making your kid feel like a bag kid. Love how DCUM is all about mental health, then piles on that IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT as a parent for not fixing this and now your kid is treated and feels poorly.
The kid was being bad. This will hopefully fix that behavior.
I think that teacher is a jerk, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Had taken that approach, but it seems like a rather severe immutable punishment for...talking in the hallways. If a child punches someone, which most would agree is a far more serious behavioral matter, are they given 3 months of daily punishment?
DD says they feel some kids are now treating them differently due to this.
It's not 3 months. The school year is over in 6 weeks. It's also not that bad of a punishment. The appropriate punishment for talking is to separate her from the people she's talking with. The teacher did that.
Not OP.
Sure it is. Her DD now has the Scarlet Letter every single time they line up.
And yes, my kid would have volunteered to be the caboose, thinking it or the "lead" were the 2 cool positions. Shut the classroom door, turn off the lights, make sure everyone is out. The teacher could have formulated this in a positive manner instead of making your kid feel like a bag kid. Love how DCUM is all about mental health, then piles on that IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT as a parent for not fixing this and now your kid is treated and feels poorly.
I think that teacher is a jerk, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Had taken that approach, but it seems like a rather severe immutable punishment for...talking in the hallways. If a child punches someone, which most would agree is a far more serious behavioral matter, are they given 3 months of daily punishment?
DD says they feel some kids are now treating them differently due to this.
It's not 3 months. The school year is over in 6 weeks. It's also not that bad of a punishment. The appropriate punishment for talking is to separate her from the people she's talking with. The teacher did that.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.