Anonymous wrote:Always funny to see conservatives freak out about Oberlin, Wesleyan, Vassar, and Brown because of reputations forged from the 60s to 80s when the reality is that today they are very middle of the road institutions
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education should allow freedom of speech, respect differing opinions, and encourage intellectual discourse presented from a variety of perspectives. Ultra-liberal, leftist schools are intolerant of opposing thought.
And schools that fail to promote this type of environment will suffer in the marketplace. How many non-LGBTQ males who get 1500 on their SATs would choose Vassar over all their other options? Oberlin is way off the charts now, and Wesleyan has plunged as well. Haverford has declined, now tied with Richmond (which has a conservative reputation). Reed is nowhere to be found. W&L is thriving. Southern schools in general are thriving. Who wants to go to school with a bunch of angry single minded activists who can't even have a conversation but can only call you names?
Whoah you are so clearly in a suburban bubble. Vassar and oberlin are very popular with the boys in our Brooklyn crowd
That is exactly my point. They are ONLY popular with the Brooklyn crowd.
A quarter of Vassar comes from NY - so it's even a larger percentage of the domestic student population. It basically just draws from 5 states where wokeness prevails.
https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/vassar-college/student-life/diversity/chart-geographic-diversity.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You also get access to the most comprehensive network of Oxford/Cambridge fellowships and study away of any school in the country.
It's a really good school. If it were in a suburban area or had the consortium access the others do, it'd crush the competition.
Because you really need to get out of Williamstown!
Is there departmental output data on these schools? The relative size of departments skews earnings data quite a bit. Earnings by overall college is a terrible metric that has a lot of attention now (wait, you mean a niche tech school has high mean and median earnings but actually their CS grads earn the same as another elite school's?).
+1 kind of a jock vibe in the middle of nowhere. We decided to pretty quickly leave and spend an afternoon at Six Flags New England!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:overrated - Colby and Richmond; to a lesser extent, Bowdoin
underrated - Haverford, Macalester and Wesleyan
Agree and would add Carleton.
Carleton has been the underrated but great SLAC at least since I was looking 20 years ago. I think that it's reached the point where so many people consider it underrated that it may actually be overrated
#6 isn't really underrated territory. I would personally slide Midd over it.
Why?
Comparably strong academic profile. More resources. Alumni network probably much more robust. Carleton is kind of a goofy little school in the middle of nowhere and far from centers of influence. Kind of like a Haverford or Swarthmore but removed from the eastern seaboard. Name recognition kind of light. Don’t get me wrong- I’m sure it’s filled with brilliant intellectual kids and great profs but so is Midd at this point, more so than in the past. I’ve met many Midd grads- never met a Carleton grad but my world is more east coast corporate. But that is kind of the point.
So it's not east coast corporate? Sign me up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do think that the focus of popular universities is moving west and south.
A lot of factors here but the fact that the northeastern schools have become irredeemably woke is a major one. Parents know garbage when they see it.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amherst, Swarthmore, and Pomona should be above, or at least with, Williams at this point. Williams and Princeton have been USNWR darlings for a decade+ but people are still choosing to go to Harvard and Stanford instead for national universities and to Amherst and Swarthmore for SLACs.
How can you substantiate this?
It is imperfect but Parchment's head-to-heads have enough data to be statistically significant for these small groups. Harvard and Swarthmore would be the preferred schools in each group.
Harvard is the favorite over Princeton (https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Harvard+University&with=Princeton+University) and Stanford (https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Harvard+University&with=Stanford+University)
Swarthmore is preferred over Williams (https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Swarthmore+College&with=Williams+College) and Amherst (https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Swarthmore+College&with=Amherst+College)
Parchment is not a reliable resource...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:overrated - Colby and Richmond; to a lesser extent, Bowdoin
underrated - Haverford, Macalester and Wesleyan
Agree and would add Carleton.
Carleton has been the underrated but great SLAC at least since I was looking 20 years ago. I think that it's reached the point where so many people consider it underrated that it may actually be overrated
#6 isn't really underrated territory. I would personally slide Midd over it.
Why?
Comparably strong academic profile. More resources. Alumni network probably much more robust. Carleton is kind of a goofy little school in the middle of nowhere and far from centers of influence. Kind of like a Haverford or Swarthmore but removed from the eastern seaboard. Name recognition kind of light. Don’t get me wrong- I’m sure it’s filled with brilliant intellectual kids and great profs but so is Midd at this point, more so than in the past. I’ve met many Midd grads- never met a Carleton grad but my world is more east coast corporate. But that is kind of the point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love Davidson so I would (biasedly) say it’s ranked too low.
AGREED! Davidson rocks. I'm not an alum nor do I have a student there. But, I do know multiple kids that attend or have attended. Great results and really well-rounded, bright people.
I mean, yes it’s a good school but there aren’t many schools ranked above it that aren’t at least as good or better.
You know Steph Curry went there, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:overrated - Colby and Richmond; to a lesser extent, Bowdoin
underrated - Haverford, Macalester and Wesleyan
Agree and would add Carleton.
Carleton has been the underrated but great SLAC at least since I was looking 20 years ago. I think that it's reached the point where so many people consider it underrated that it may actually be overrated
#6 isn't really underrated territory. I would personally slide Midd over it.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do think that the focus of popular universities is moving west and south.
A lot of factors here but the fact that the northeastern schools have become irredeemably woke is a major one. Parents know garbage when they see it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love Davidson so I would (biasedly) say it’s ranked too low.
AGREED! Davidson rocks. I'm not an alum nor do I have a student there. But, I do know multiple kids that attend or have attended. Great results and really well-rounded, bright people.
I mean, yes it’s a good school but there aren’t many schools ranked above it that aren’t at least as good or better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I prefer A/S/P over Williams but objectively, there's no denying Williams is superior. In fact, Williams consistently wins cross admit battles against Amherst and hit a much higher yield recently (59% vs Amherst and Swat's 40-45%).
Williams has a smaller student to faculty ratio, smaller classes (nearly 80% under 20 vs 65-75% at the others), better maintained facilities (Swat might be prettier but the buildings themselves aren't in the best physical shape), winter study and tutorials for truly distinctive academic experiences, the top d3 athletic program, stronger students by academic standards, and better outcomes based on most outcome oriented rankings. You also get access to the most comprehensive network of Oxford/Cambridge fellowships and study away of any school in the country.
It's a really good school. If it were in a suburban area or had the consortium access the others do, it'd crush the competition.
It's best to be careful when arguing for prestige from published yield numbers for SLACs (or any selective university with ED, for that matter). Yield numbers include those accepted through ED, for whom the yield is typically above 95%. Many selective colleges and universities recruit more than half their classes through ED, boosting their yield numbers. Schools like Chicago and Tulane are infamous for this practice. However, when one looks at yield in regular decision, where there is actual customer choice involved (and hard choices are made regarding cost/benefit), the numbers tell a different story. Here's a list of elite SLACs, with their RD yields (all these numbers are from published institutional data for class of 2026):
Wesleyan 0.19
Middlebury 0.21
Williams 0.21
Swarthmore 0.26
Haverford 0.28
Carleton 0.28
CMC 0.28
Amherst 0.29
Pomona 0.29
Bowdoin 0.41
For comparison, here are RD yields for some highly selective universities with ED:
Duke 0.44
Northwestern 0.44
Brown 0.49
Cornell 0.50
Columbia 0.50
Dartmouth 0.52
UPenn 0.58
Yieldwise, the SLACs (with the exception of Bowdoin) aren't even in the same league as the selective universities. Make of this what you will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:overrated - Colby and Richmond; to a lesser extent, Bowdoin
underrated - Haverford, Macalester and Wesleyan
Agree and would add Carleton.
Carleton has been the underrated but great SLAC at least since I was looking 20 years ago. I think that it's reached the point where so many people consider it underrated that it may actually be overrated
#6 isn't really underrated territory. I would personally slide Midd over it.