Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
First things first -- people like what they like and it is different from others.
Second many people just do not like urban living -- I don't. Not even sure I like suburban.
Third ---- the way we live is not even close to being unsustainable in any way. I have no idea what you mean by impossible to maintain long exburban roads. That is not even an issue in the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point, we could afford very nice urban living, but we prefer to have neighbors with a wider diversity of political viewpoints.
Yes, there are very good people on both sides.![]()
np. the fact that you say this sarcastically proves her point
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused by the people who want yards. I think I'd rather live right next to or very close by some awesome parks. When I was growing up, we only played in our yard until we were 6 or 7, then it was just playdates with other kids.... which you'd have to drive to in the 'burbs. My city kids walk around the block to play with their friends. Sure you need money, but DC is amazing for having close-in neighborhoods with green space and parks and being pretty safe.
Suburbs have both great parks, great yards, friend to walk to.
Capture the flag, catching lightning bugs while parents visit on the deck.
Have you ever lived in a city? Do you think that doesn't happen here too?
So we get a yard AND friends running to park. How is that not better?
Who wants to mow a lawn? Treat grass?
No thank you.
Suburban dweller here. You really think we all mow our own lawns? In my neighborhood its generally just the retired military guys who mow their own lawns. Otherwise we contribute to the local economy by hiring lawn services.
I think part of the point is who wants to either do it or hire people to do it? It's work, and also, if you generally need to mow your green monolithic grass lawn, it's absolutely terrible for the environment.
Do you travel? Fly? Terrible for the environment.
DP. I travel via Amtrak domestically, including pretty long distances. I do not travel via plane much due to the environmental impact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
Well, those are the people who choose to live in cities. The people in New York City and London and Tokyo choose to live there. The people who want more space move out to the suburbs or countryside in England or to the suburbs or countryside in America, or to the far out suburbs and countryside wayyyy out on the rail lines in Japan.
Before everyone starts going on about these cities --- in London -- once bankers and magic circle lawyers make partner and have kids older enough to go to school they move out to the country and take a train. If they get really rich they move back to the city but just rich they stay in the country. Why? Because they can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
Well, those are the people who choose to live in cities. The people in New York City and London and Tokyo choose to live there. The people who want more space move out to the suburbs or countryside in England or to the suburbs or countryside in America, or to the far out suburbs and countryside wayyyy out on the rail lines in Japan.
Before everyone starts going on about these cities --- in London -- once bankers and magic circle lawyers make partner and have kids older enough to go to school they move out to the country and take a train. If they get really rich they move back to the city but just rich they stay in the country. Why? Because they can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, I get that people want different lifestyles, but the way America's suburbs are design is so incredibly horrible for the environment that it's hard for me to understand.
So you think creating super cities like Shanghai, NYC, CDMX, São Paulo, etc. across the globe are preferable to more, smaller cities? No thank you. Those cities don't fair well in a pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:For me, I get that people want different lifestyles, but the way America's suburbs are design is so incredibly horrible for the environment that it's hard for me to understand.
Anonymous wrote:For me, I get that people want different lifestyles, but the way America's suburbs are design is so incredibly horrible for the environment that it's hard for me to understand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
Well, those are the people who choose to live in cities. The people in New York City and London and Tokyo choose to live there. The people who want more space move out to the suburbs or countryside in England or to the suburbs or countryside in America, or to the far out suburbs and countryside wayyyy out on the rail lines in Japan.
Anonymous wrote:80+% of Americans live in cities...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
Agreed. The American landscape is largely a dead place.
That said, there are large numbers of Americans who do prefer walkable urban living; one factor behind the huge COL increases in places like SF.
Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally