Anonymous wrote:My son has started lacrosse. He’s a strong swimmer and does club swim as well but wanted a team sport in addition to his individual activities.
He’s kind of a little bro, but I don’t discourage it. He seems well liked at school and at all of his activities so I’m sure he’ll be fine. He’s only ten now, so I’ll report back when he’s 17 lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid's lax team has the highest average GPA of all the D1 athletes at their university. They also do community service year round as do many of the other teams.
This is the problem.. It's like maintenance alcoholics in the making. It is not okay to drink excessively, treat women like they are disposable, and be an entitled a$$hole ... Then say but I get good grade and volunteer so it is okay.
This is true!! The culture is toxic. They love to trash talk women. Treating others like crap is their sport because lacrosse is just weird.
Lacrosse was a prep school sport when I grew up in 70s , when did it become popular around here? Our kids did not get into lacrosse, DD played for a year but never really got into the game. It was looked down as a rich kids sport when I was a kid, no one, and I mean no one played lacrosse in central PA in 70s and 80s except for kids that went to prep schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I didn't get that -- I'm from the Midwest -- but I'm starting to understand I think. Why would it be so, so important for a child who is only 60 months old to excel at LAX? (when it's fine to be laid back and developmentally appropriate regarding soccer or swimming)? Hm.
b/c there is no expectation (desire) that their child will swim or play soccer at the college level.
With lacrosse, once you have a step up vs your peers on skills, you get more playing time. More playing time = more time to further improve your skills. It is a cycle. You can't just put a stick in his hands in middle school and expect for him to pick it up.
I hope you are not a coach. Because this is completely untrue--you can absolutely start in MS or HS. You are probably one these dickhead Dads who coach and trying to relive some faded glory. The better you are does not and should not be the only factor for playing time, esp. at the MS level. The boys and girls are there to develop their skills and have fun. At the Varsity level in HS and college you can start play your star players all the time. I hate the culture of any sport that tries to make it all about the most gifted players from day one--it's absurd! Kids are developing into good sportsmen in the early years.
Anonymous wrote:This has always been the men's lacrosse culture .... it is not THESE DAYS.. you were just unaware.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White kids who can’t play other real sports
Weird I actually see plenty Asian/black/Latino kids on local rosters but I guess you have some racial resentment you need to work on
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both my sons started lacrosse in kindergarten and have played ever since, and are rising 9th and 11th graders at a DC Catholic school, so they're obviously the target for a lot of the dislike here, based on what I've read.
What I will say from my experience as a parent involved with the sport is that you have a small group of complete f--kwits, a small group of genuinely nice/awesome people, and then a large group of just average types who aren't always nice but are also nice enough that I wouldn't throw them in the f--kwit group.
I.e., it's generally a bellcurve of behavior and --OMG--I'm pretty sure you'll find that same distribution across all competitive sports, and in all public and private schools. Lacrosse players are no more or no less obnoxious than your average teenager.
There's such a strong tendency across this whole message board to divide up society into "good"/in groups (of which the poster is a member) and "evil"/out groups (it's okay to attack them--they're the BAD guys!). It's pretty tiresome and if you're an adult doing this maybe look in the mirror and try to be better.
Where there's a pattern, there's a problem. That doesn't mean everyone follows the pattern.
Anonymous wrote:Both my sons started lacrosse in kindergarten and have played ever since, and are rising 9th and 11th graders at a DC Catholic school, so they're obviously the target for a lot of the dislike here, based on what I've read.
What I will say from my experience as a parent involved with the sport is that you have a small group of complete f--kwits, a small group of genuinely nice/awesome people, and then a large group of just average types who aren't always nice but are also nice enough that I wouldn't throw them in the f--kwit group.
I.e., it's generally a bellcurve of behavior and --OMG--I'm pretty sure you'll find that same distribution across all competitive sports, and in all public and private schools. Lacrosse players are no more or no less obnoxious than your average teenager.
There's such a strong tendency across this whole message board to divide up society into "good"/in groups (of which the poster is a member) and "evil"/out groups (it's okay to attack them--they're the BAD guys!). It's pretty tiresome and if you're an adult doing this maybe look in the mirror and try to be better.
Anonymous wrote:It was just as bad as OP describes decades ago. Back then, the root cause was that Lacrosse was a hook to get DC into any Ivy. So it was hyper-competitive to be recognized as a good Lacrosse player.
There also is an unofficial, but very real, Lacrosse pipeline from some Ivys to high salary jobs at Wall St firms.
Anonymous wrote:It's the last bastion of wealthy white boys with middling athletic skills. Golf and tennis are gone. So will lacrosse, now that public schools (and football players) are starting to play. My son goes to a big lacrosse school and I'm SO glad he plays other sports. And the parents are obnoxious.
Anonymous wrote:White kids who can’t play other real sports