Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are a prude. When everyone is a consenting adult, who cares? I am a guy. When I was 24, I dated a 40 year old woman. It was a fling and it was hot, absolutely nobody was a victim. I was not "groomed."
Just because some women here are not attracted to younger men does not make an older person "yucky" for dating a younger adult.
Grooming is a real thing. You may or may not have been groomed most victims of grooming never realize it.
And yes it does make the older person yucky.
Your statement here reduces the agency of adults to children. Young adults have enough agency to sign up for the military and be trained to kill other people. Yet those same young adults lack the agency to engage in a consensual relationship with another, older adult? That position is absurd.
The current trend is to think of people younger than 25 as not fully having the agency of an adult. I think your view is going to look outdated and gross in the coming decades.
So a 23 year old shouldn't be able to vote, serve on a jury, or join the military? What is a decision of greater import; choosing to have consensual sex with a 40-year-old or sitting on a jury that decides to convict or acquit a person charged with murder? I remember being 23, I was not a child. Were you just wandering around like a babe in the woods during your early 20s, incapable of making any adult decisions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are a prude. When everyone is a consenting adult, who cares? I am a guy. When I was 24, I dated a 40 year old woman. It was a fling and it was hot, absolutely nobody was a victim. I was not "groomed."
Just because some women here are not attracted to younger men does not make an older person "yucky" for dating a younger adult.
Grooming is a real thing. You may or may not have been groomed most victims of grooming never realize it.
And yes it does make the older person yucky.
Your statement here reduces the agency of adults to children. Young adults have enough agency to sign up for the military and be trained to kill other people. Yet those same young adults lack the agency to engage in a consensual relationship with another, older adult? That position is absurd.
The current trend is to think of people younger than 25 as not fully having the agency of an adult. I think your view is going to look outdated and gross in the coming decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are a prude. When everyone is a consenting adult, who cares? I am a guy. When I was 24, I dated a 40 year old woman. It was a fling and it was hot, absolutely nobody was a victim. I was not "groomed."
Just because some women here are not attracted to younger men does not make an older person "yucky" for dating a younger adult.
Grooming is a real thing. You may or may not have been groomed most victims of grooming never realize it.
And yes it does make the older person yucky.
Your statement here reduces the agency of adults to children. Young adults have enough agency to sign up for the military and be trained to kill other people. Yet those same young adults lack the agency to engage in a consensual relationship with another, older adult? That position is absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is worse than Trumpland
Agree completely.
The people of DCUMAD are appointing themselves the judges and deciding whether to accept how other adults choose between themselves how to love.
Should “we” allow inter-generational love? Should we condemn it? Judge it?
You people are disgusting!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are a prude. When everyone is a consenting adult, who cares? I am a guy. When I was 24, I dated a 40 year old woman. It was a fling and it was hot, absolutely nobody was a victim. I was not "groomed."
Just because some women here are not attracted to younger men does not make an older person "yucky" for dating a younger adult.
Grooming is a real thing. You may or may not have been groomed most victims of grooming never realize it.
And yes it does make the older person yucky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is so silly, if it was a 50-year-old woman dating a 28 year old you’d all be gushing about how empowered she was and how incredible that she didn’t care about societal norms, then a number of you will talk about how you need a 28 year old to keep up with your raging libido.
Flip the genders and you’ve got predator, flip them back and you’re Susan B Anthony.
Uh absolutely not. That’s as gross as the flipped genders. And by the way when they’re the same genders.
I totally agree. Female groomers often get a pass but that doesn’t make grooming less gross and wrong. I’m not one to say that a woman doing something is as bad as a man doing something but women can 100% be predators too, which is sad because it contributes to the stigma against men and boys who have been sexually abused by women.
Anonymous wrote:This is so silly, if it was a 50-year-old woman dating a 28 year old you’d all be gushing about how empowered she was and how incredible that she didn’t care about societal norms, then a number of you will talk about how you need a 28 year old to keep up with your raging libido.
Flip the genders and you’ve got predator, flip them back and you’re Susan B Anthony.
Uh absolutely not. That’s as gross as the flipped genders. And by the way when they’re the same genders.
Anonymous wrote:You are a prude. When everyone is a consenting adult, who cares? I am a guy. When I was 24, I dated a 40 year old woman. It was a fling and it was hot, absolutely nobody was a victim. I was not "groomed."
Just because some women here are not attracted to younger men does not make an older person "yucky" for dating a younger adult.
Anonymous wrote:This is so silly, if it was a 50-year-old woman dating a 28 year old you’d all be gushing about how empowered she was and how incredible that she didn’t care about societal norms, then a number of you will talk about how you need a 28 year old to keep up with your raging libido.
Flip the genders and you’ve got predator, flip them back and you’re Susan B Anthony.
[/quote
Uh absolutely not. That’s as gross as the flipped genders. And by the way when they’re the same genders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is my take. I am a guy BTW (and not dating). Socially accepted age gap: 10 years of age. Upper limit (can be uncomfortable to some): 15 years.
20 years and above: gross as age gap approaches to parent and child
The socially acceptable age gap is shrinking. Gen Z calls even a 32 yr old trying to hook up with a college student “grooming.” Obviously I think that’s silly but that’s the way things are moving.
They say that online. That’s not how they act on the dating apps.
They say on dating apps “dating old men is socially acceptable”?
They’re down for the sneaky link. Sometimes I’m introduced to friends but not always.
Anonymous wrote:This is so silly, if it was a 50-year-old woman dating a 28 year old you’d all be gushing about how empowered she was and how incredible that she didn’t care about societal norms, then a number of you will talk about how you need a 28 year old to keep up with your raging libido.
Flip the genders and you’ve got predator, flip them back and you’re Susan B Anthony.