Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh god
Ok? I literally just said that people who want to do travel sports are too losers. What's the oh God for?
Anonymous wrote:Oh god
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Travel sports are for losers is what I gather here
![]()
What gave yiu that idea? Not fir lovers, just insanely time consuming and expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Travel sports are for losers is what I gather here
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Travel sports are for losers is what I gather here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the money maker here. Kids in Northern Europe are much more active-many bike or ski to school, have PE almost daily and enjoy sports after school. They understand that only a few make it to top level. Parents and children are not in lalaland. My ex (American) and DS believed here in US that he could make it. I have no idea who sold it to them.
Back at home government supports many programs. Being active saves money long term in health care and keeping kids out of trouble.
Parents are not milked of their money. The few kids who are really gifted, get sponsored really fast.
I lived in MoCo when they cut middle school sports in public schools. The explosion in club soccer followed pretty soon after.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because nobody plays outside anymore.
It’s sick.
Our kids play outdoors and play sports. It’s not that complicated.[/quote
You're lucky if your kids and their friends aren't too busy to play outside. Most kids these days are
My kids play outside regularly (with travel sport teammates, even!).
It’s fine not to be a fan of travel sports, but it’s not as all or nothing as some people seem to think it is. My kids also do music, as do most of their friends. All their choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of kids on travel teams that just aren't talented and shouldn't play. Their parents continue paying for them to be in travel and it just makes no sense since its a huge time suck. Rec league is a great place for majority of kids, which leaves more time to do other things such as enrichment.
What's the harm if they are having a good time? It actually doesn't suck up that much more than rec.
Seriously? 3 days a week practice and games on Saturday and Sunday in different states is not sucking up a bunch of family time? All for a kid who is good, will never go pro but is "having a good time?" Hah ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're doing what you say everyone else is doing but you're confused? Why do you allow your own kids to play sports at that level?
+1 I grew up in the US and my kids have played one rec sport each through elementary school and high school, skipping a few years here and there. Never have our days been consumed by sports. Curious why yours are so over scheduled.
When I was a kid in FCPS in the 90s, you could walk on to some high school sports with very little experience as a freshman. That was a different era. Now for the popular sports, you won’t make the high school team in popular sports without travel/club experience. It’s much more competitive. So the options would be rec up to high school, and then transition into a less popular sport or non sport clubs. For some kids, that would be quite upsetting because they love the sport they are in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because nobody plays outside anymore.
It’s sick.
Our kids play outdoors and play sports. It’s not that complicated.[/quote
You're lucky if your kids and their friends aren't too busy to play outside. Most kids these days are
Anonymous wrote:Because nobody plays outside anymore.
It’s sick.