Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Horrible that these kids will have these images of them on the internet forever. They're just kids. Where are there parents in all of this.
some parents sell their own kids so just b/c someone has parents doesnt mean that they are safe & protected and it is well known that once exploitative pictures of children are out there, pedophiles hunt down said kids and rape them and pass them around to each other. pedophilia has gotten absolutely out of control.. sexual images children are absolutely disgusting.. we SHOULD be 'prudish' about it-- this shouldn't even be allowed to be a fantasy.. honestly ppl who are turned on by kids at all should commit suicide b/c they are monsters and they could hurt children and that chance is not worth taking. I also do not understand how pedophilia is not a capital crime-- these people are predators.. they should be hunted down and killed by the state. and yes.. the life of a child is more valuable than that of a full grown adult who could commit a crime against said child. Avoiding a bad experience for the child is absolutely worth the actual lived experience of life for the adult.
Anonymous wrote:Horrible that these kids will have these images of them on the internet forever. They're just kids. Where are there parents in all of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??
For me? No. Their lawsuit also is ridiculous and attempting to pass the buck — it makes me think even worse of them, not better. There was no way this was not approved and vetted internally.
I’m done.
What do you think the chances are that the lawsuit was just for show and they drop it?
It seems the defendants could have some rich material showing that Balenciaga had many internal approvals green lighting the ads.
The law suit is about the first campaign, luxury handbags photographed with documents. If they signed off on “generic paperwork”, the suit will at least confirm that, and maybe explain where the props came from. Something reused from a procedural drama is the theory. Again, this is a campaign from last summer that didn’t involve children. As it happens, the document is the decision saying there’s no first amendment right to child pornography. How is that pro pedophilia? Balenciaga wanted gobbledegook and instead got something that’s easily misconstrued. They shouldn’t have a case, but given this tempest, kind of seems like they do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??
For me? No. Their lawsuit also is ridiculous and attempting to pass the buck — it makes me think even worse of them, not better. There was no way this was not approved and vetted internally.
I’m done.
What do you think the chances are that the lawsuit was just for show and they drop it?
It seems the defendants could have some rich material showing that Balenciaga had many internal approvals green lighting the ads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??
For me? No. Their lawsuit also is ridiculous and attempting to pass the buck — it makes me think even worse of them, not better. There was no way this was not approved and vetted internally.
I’m done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??
For me? No. Their lawsuit also is ridiculous and attempting to pass the buck — it makes me think even worse of them, not better. There was no way this was not approved and vetted internally.
I’m done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??
For me? No. Their lawsuit also is ridiculous and attempting to pass the buck — it makes me think even worse of them, not better. There was no way this was not approved and vetted internally.
I’m done.
Anonymous wrote:Did the apology they posted on IG have any positive impact??