Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:probably the schools with strong alumni support on wall street, but like to hear thoughts on what people see. Bucknell, W&L, Kelly, BC, ‘Nova? Assume NYU is top 25
They will fill up the 'back office' and if lucky, 'middle office'.
Bucknell and Lehigh grads with high gpa’s get front office jobs if they target it and are singularly focused on getting it the moment they set foot on campus as freshman
"Front office' in Utah.
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question but do you generally need to have charisma, be really put-together, good looking, outgoing, etc. to get these jobs?
The kids I know fit this description but I have a very small sample.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I generally agree but not everyone is into STEM
Finance and accounting are great for non-STEM people
I would add business analytics and MIS
Business professor again: I worked as a quant. Wow, lots of hate for telling the truth about helicopter parents who lack faith in their kids.
Accounting has merit, but DCUM insists on front office investment banking, not sales, trading, research, asset management, nor risk management. Certainly nothing pedestrian like accounting.
Analytics and MIS are STEM by definition. The problem is that undergrad business curricula are broad and flexible enough to allow lightweight STEM. You should seek the more rigorous STEM courses, inside and outside the business school. If you want authentic Chinese food, then you should go to restaurants where the Chinese are. Whoops, that is not a terrible heuristic for STEM. But you want to go where the nerds are, in math, science, computer science, and engineering.
What if your kid is a greedy stupid nincompoop, uninterested and incapable of learning anything challenging? Then I guess he must work long hours as a spreadsheet monkey. I don't see any other reason to pay him.
To be fair, I'm not sure how I would judge the quality of undergrad business programs. But I don't want to shoehorn my kids into a profession. I'll just steer them toward a place with the most general opportunities, and encourage them to experiment and challenge themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of truth in the old adage: Those who can work in the private sector; those who can't teach.
I’ve done both. Overall, the people who went into PhD programs in econ are smarter than those who went into banking. There are more duds among those who went into industry.
Of course they are.
But PhDs working at hedge funds are smarter than PhDs working in academia.
Which “hedge funds?” There are many mid PhD dropouts working at family offices.
Renaissance, Jane Street, Two Sigma etc. They probably make 10-20 times what Ph.Ds at academia make.
My nephew works for Jane Street - he was a physics major at Michigan (‘21 grad) and said students in his major were recruited more heavily than the business majors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern and Brown overall are on par with schools like Northeastern and below Boston College.
NYU Business: $93.6K
Notre Dame Finance: $96K
Berkeley Business: $95k
Boston College Finance: $94.6k
UVA Business: $96K
Georgetown Finance: $107K
You are sophomoric and sloppy. For example, I edited your post because you listed Berkeley twice.
Let me review your conceptual error regarding business placement. https://www.businessinsider.com/best-college-major-for-wall-street-2016-8
Roughly 50% of Wall Street jobs went to business majors, and 20% to economics majors. You think that means business is the best path to Wall Street. But you overlooked that fact that there are over 10 times as many business majors as economics majors. For example, suppose there are 100 jobs available, there are 500 economics graduates, and 5,000 business graduates. Business graduates get 50 jobs on Wall Street; that is 1% of business graduates. Economics graduates get 20 jobs; that is 4% of economics graduates. So, economics graduates have 4 times the chance of landing on Wall Street. Physics and applied math graduates are greatly overrepresented too.
Think about how selection bias affects those numbers. NYU, Columbia (NYC), Berkeley (Silicon Valley), Northeastern, Boston College (Boston), and Georgetown (DC northeast corridor) are in expensive areas. Northwestern and Notre Dame have impressive numbers considering their placements in the midwest. I know Georgetown has good placement. Virginia probably places students near D.C. or northeast.
I'm not sure about Brown, although my Maryland friend transferred there and I knew an economics professor. I suspect many Brown students go on for masters degrees in forestry or divinity, or take low-paying jobs at liberal nonprofits. That drags down the avererage salary. If anything, it would help you stand out at Brown.
That is important. The average salary is based on the average student. Some colleges and majors are more selective, or attract business-oriented students. But that does not mean you will get a higher salary by going there.
Finally, comparing Northwestern to Northeastern is ludicrous. Northwestern has dozens of Nobel laureates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation
Anonymous wrote:It turns out Northeastern has been gaming the ratings.
https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/08/26/how-northeastern-gamed-the-college-rankings/
I don't think I have ever met a professor or Wall Street colleague from there. I don't recall any research accolades for their business school, math, or science. There might be a few good, sincere scholars. But they are not an intellectual powerhouse like the Top 25.
Anonymous wrote:It turns out Northeastern has been gaming the ratings.
https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/08/26/how-northeastern-gamed-the-college-rankings/
I don't think I have ever met a professor or Wall Street colleague from there. I don't recall any research accolades for their business school, math, or science. There might be a few good, sincere scholars. But they are not an intellectual powerhouse like the Top 25.
Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern and Brown overall are on par with schools like Northeastern and below Boston College.
NYU Business: $93.6K
Notre Dame Finance: $96K
Berkeley Business: $95k
Boston College Finance: $94.6k
UVA Business: $96K
Georgetown Finance: $107K
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question but do you generally need to have charisma, be really put-together, good looking, outgoing, etc. to get these jobs?
The kids I know fit this description but I have a very small sample.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of truth in the old adage: Those who can work in the private sector; those who can't teach.
I’ve done both. Overall, the people who went into PhD programs in econ are smarter than those who went into banking. There are more duds among those who went into industry.
Of course they are.
But PhDs working at hedge funds are smarter than PhDs working in academia.
Which “hedge funds?” There are many mid PhD dropouts working at family offices.
Renaissance, Jane Street, Two Sigma etc. They probably make 10-20 times what Ph.Ds at academia make.
My nephew works for Jane Street - he was a physics major at Michigan (‘21 grad) and said students in his major were recruited more heavily than the business majors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern is severely overrated and over-hyped.
It's econ students are obviously behind business students from NYU, Georgetown, Cornell, Notre Dame, UVA, Berkeley, etc. etc.
Still waiting for numbers for Econ graduates vs Business graduates from T25 schools.
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/
Then why didn't you provide the numbers?
The point of the thread was to compare opportunities at #25 UVA McIntire with opportunities at slightly higher ranked schools without business. Here are US News ranks and College Scorecard salaries:
#11 Northwestern
All: $80,033
Economics $85,909
Managerial Economics: NA
#12 Dartmouth
All: $91,627
Economics $98,252
#13 Brown
All: $78,943
Economics: $78,949
Entrepreneurship: $91,029
#18 Columbia
All: $89,871
Economics: $87,202
#25 UVA
All: $77,048
Economics: $71,811
Business (McIntire) $95,939
At most schools, Economics majors make about the same or slightly more than the average graduate. But UVA requires admission to McIntire, so their economics students are below average, and their business students are above average. Unfortunately, Northwestern does not provide salaries for their Managerial Economics track. But Brown Entrepreneurship and Small Business majors make distinctly more than Economics majors. Again, there is a selection effect. Harvard Economics majors make $100K. But if your unqualified kid somehow snuck into Harvard, then he would probably make less.
There are also geographic effects. Many Northwestern students take jobs in the midwest, where salaries and cost of living are lower. Columbia students take jobs in NYC, where salaries and cost of living are higher.
For the sake of discussion, I'll assume that financial aid packages equalize the cost of college, and assume no geographical preference. Given the noise, I don't see a lot of difference in these numbers. Yale Economics graduates make "only" $91K compared to McIntire's $96K. Does that mean your kid should turn down Yale? I don't think so!
Again, I think the opportunities outside business are important. If you might go to graduate school, then your undergrad major is less important. Obviously geography makes a difference, living in NYC vs. Charlottesville. Finally, cost could be a major consideration. These factors overwhelm the minor differences in starting salaries.
Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern is severely overrated and over-hyped.
It's econ students are obviously behind business students from NYU, Georgetown, Cornell, Notre Dame, UVA, Berkeley, etc. etc.
Still waiting for numbers for Econ graduates vs Business graduates from T25 schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of truth in the old adage: Those who can work in the private sector; those who can't teach.
I’ve done both. Overall, the people who went into PhD programs in econ are smarter than those who went into banking. There are more duds among those who went into industry.
Of course they are.
But PhDs working at hedge funds are smarter than PhDs working in academia.
Which “hedge funds?” There are many mid PhD dropouts working at family offices.
Renaissance, Jane Street, Two Sigma etc. They probably make 10-20 times what Ph.Ds at academia make.