Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Pretty much every elementary in the Langley and McLean districts (with the exception of Timber Lane) will be high SES.
Elementaries that feed schools like Lake Braddock and West Springfield are likely to be mid-tier.
Does your school offer free breakfast or free lunch for all students this year? If so, it’s definitely Title I.
Very helpful, thank you. No free lunch this year, but they did last year.
All schools had free lunch last year for all students. It was a Covid thing. Look on the great schools website and you will see how many kids qualify for free an reduced meals at your school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Pretty much every elementary in the Langley and McLean districts (with the exception of Timber Lane) will be high SES.
Elementaries that feed schools like Lake Braddock and West Springfield are likely to be mid-tier.
Does your school offer free breakfast or free lunch for all students this year? If so, it’s definitely Title I.
Very helpful, thank you. No free lunch this year, but they did last year.
All schools had free lunch last year for all students. It was a Covid thing. Look on the great schools website and you will see how many kids qualify for free a reduced meals at your school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Pretty much every elementary in the Langley and McLean districts (with the exception of Timber Lane) will be high SES.
Elementaries that feed schools like Lake Braddock and West Springfield are likely to be mid-tier.
Does your school offer free breakfast or free lunch for all students this year? If so, it’s definitely Title I.
Very helpful, thank you. No free lunch this year, but they did last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Pretty much every elementary in the Langley and McLean districts (with the exception of Timber Lane) will be high SES.
Elementaries that feed schools like Lake Braddock and West Springfield are likely to be mid-tier.
Does your school offer free breakfast or free lunch for all students this year? If so, it’s definitely Title I.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:
In our school, this resulted in 3 out of 85 non-level IV kids being moved into advanced math. In other words, the bar is very high.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Perhaps a weird question: how do you find out the SES of the school? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:It’s extremely difficult to comment on chances for admission without knowing the school. I can understand not wanting to mention your school by name but you at least need to identify as high-SES, mid-tier, or Title One.
Anonymous wrote:Advanced math is determined in the first month of the new school year. All Level IV kids automatically get advanced math.
Other Kids are given assessment tests to see how they fare on end of year skills (so at start of third, they want to see how you'd do on what they expect kids to know by end of third grade). The local principal looks at those scores, plus prior year math grades, COGAT quant score and Iready math scores and comes up with a decision that doesn't have a firm cutoff nor is it publicized. Those kids join Level IV kids in advanced math.
In our school, this resulted in 3 out of 85 non-level IV kids being moved into advanced math. In other words, the bar is very high.
Anonymous wrote:Advanced math is determined in the first month of the new school year. All Level IV kids automatically get advanced math.
Other Kids are given assessment tests to see how they fare on end of year skills (so at start of third, they want to see how you'd do on what they expect kids to know by end of third grade). The local principal looks at those scores, plus prior year math grades, COGAT quant score and Iready math scores and comes up with a decision that doesn't have a firm cutoff nor is it publicized. Those kids join Level IV kids in advanced math.
In our school, this resulted in 3 out of 85 non-level IV kids being moved into advanced math. In other words, the bar is very high.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VQN 131 and NNAT 160. Any chance?
I would think there is a good chance based on that NNAT score.
The NNAT is barely considered at this point. The last evaluation of the AAP application process found that the NNAT carried no weight in the actual decision to include a student in AAP or not. The CogAT was nire important and GBRS were the most important. The NNAT score will help the child be in-pool and that is about it. The 131 CogAT score is close to the 132 threhold that was the "gold standard" a few years back for being in-pool and is probably more important. A high NNAT followed by a drop in the CogAT probably points to a kid who guessed well on the NNAT with the CogAT being more reflective of the child's ability. Just like a lower NNAT with a 15-20 point bump points to a child who was most likely prepped for the CogAT. In this case, the CogAT is still high, 97th or 98th percentile I think, and on the cusp of being in-pool in the past. I don't think the discrepancy will be a big deal.
The poster who metioned the Quant score is pretty on point. The committee is looking for kids who can handle the LA and the Advanced Math. Take a look at the thread where parents are asking about their kids struggling with the math in third grade. The math is accelerated in AAP and jumps a full grade level in 5th grade. The committee wants to make sure that kids are able to handle that jump so the Quant score is important. There are plenty of parents on this board who will say that the math in AAP is too slow but they tend to be the overall outliers. A good number of kids find the math challenging and some struggle with it. Finding a kid who is strong in LA but who will not be overwhelmed with the math in important. It is part of the reason why some of us think that FCPS needs and Advanced LA and Advanced Math distinction, so the kids who are strong in one of the areas has a good fit for them. Right now it feels like there is a push to jam kids who are strong in LA into LIV even if they don't have the math chops because the LA and Social Studies component of Gen Ed is too slow.
I know it is off topic but the ideal, for me, would be Advanced Math and Advanced LA. Kids who qualify for both are accepted into LIV, otherwise they attend the Advanced program in their strength. There would be fewer LIV kids but the program would be more flexible and meet more kids needs.
I'm new to this, but isn't this why we have Level III? My kid's teacher talked about recommending my son for advanced math but not going for full Level IV because the advanced LA might be too much.
Level III is once a week for an hour at schools that actually prioritize Level III services. A good number of schools do not prioritize Level III services so it rarely happens or for only 30 minutes at a time. Advanced Math is a specific program that is 5 days a week during math. It has a set curriculum and leads to kids skipping to sixth grade math in fifth grade. Advanced LA, in my ideal and totally fictional world, would work like Advanced Math. It would be 5 days a week and have a set curriculum that would allow kids who are ahead in reading and writing to continue at a pace that makes sense for them. That does not happen at this time.
I'm the PP. Thanks for this explanation. And here I was thinking it couldn't get more complicated. :-/ How do kids get selected for Advanced Math, if it's not the same as Level III? Our teacher is new to 2nd grade so she's learning some of these things as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VQN 131 and NNAT 160. Any chance?
I would think there is a good chance based on that NNAT score.
The NNAT is barely considered at this point. The last evaluation of the AAP application process found that the NNAT carried no weight in the actual decision to include a student in AAP or not. The CogAT was nire important and GBRS were the most important. The NNAT score will help the child be in-pool and that is about it. The 131 CogAT score is close to the 132 threhold that was the "gold standard" a few years back for being in-pool and is probably more important. A high NNAT followed by a drop in the CogAT probably points to a kid who guessed well on the NNAT with the CogAT being more reflective of the child's ability. Just like a lower NNAT with a 15-20 point bump points to a child who was most likely prepped for the CogAT. In this case, the CogAT is still high, 97th or 98th percentile I think, and on the cusp of being in-pool in the past. I don't think the discrepancy will be a big deal.
The poster who metioned the Quant score is pretty on point. The committee is looking for kids who can handle the LA and the Advanced Math. Take a look at the thread where parents are asking about their kids struggling with the math in third grade. The math is accelerated in AAP and jumps a full grade level in 5th grade. The committee wants to make sure that kids are able to handle that jump so the Quant score is important. There are plenty of parents on this board who will say that the math in AAP is too slow but they tend to be the overall outliers. A good number of kids find the math challenging and some struggle with it. Finding a kid who is strong in LA but who will not be overwhelmed with the math in important. It is part of the reason why some of us think that FCPS needs and Advanced LA and Advanced Math distinction, so the kids who are strong in one of the areas has a good fit for them. Right now it feels like there is a push to jam kids who are strong in LA into LIV even if they don't have the math chops because the LA and Social Studies component of Gen Ed is too slow.
I know it is off topic but the ideal, for me, would be Advanced Math and Advanced LA. Kids who qualify for both are accepted into LIV, otherwise they attend the Advanced program in their strength. There would be fewer LIV kids but the program would be more flexible and meet more kids needs.
I'm new to this, but isn't this why we have Level III? My kid's teacher talked about recommending my son for advanced math but not going for full Level IV because the advanced LA might be too much.
Level III is once a week for an hour at schools that actually prioritize Level III services. A good number of schools do not prioritize Level III services so it rarely happens or for only 30 minutes at a time. Advanced Math is a specific program that is 5 days a week during math. It has a set curriculum and leads to kids skipping to sixth grade math in fifth grade. Advanced LA, in my ideal and totally fictional world, would work like Advanced Math. It would be 5 days a week and have a set curriculum that would allow kids who are ahead in reading and writing to continue at a pace that makes sense for them. That does not happen at this time.