Anonymous
11/08/2022 08:52
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reality is that Elrich is pretty ideologically aligned with voters in this county.
Then why did he win the primary by only 33 votes?
+1
Anonymous
11/08/2022 08:50
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Cool story, Elrich staffer!
Anonymous
11/08/2022 08:22
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
I voted early and voted for Sullivan.
Anonymous
11/07/2022 19:52
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Now I’m paying attention to political ads and many don’t say what party they belong to.
Anonymous
11/07/2022 19:35
Subject: Re:Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Anonymous wrote:I was looking at those Democrats for Sullivan signs today and my first thought was another GOP lie. The only lawns I see that sign in also includes Cox for governor signs. Coincidentally, the same lawns used to have Trump signs in them. One still has a trump flag.
Is this slogan "Democrats for Sullivan" supposed to fool Democrats into thinking there's a large Democratic population who wants to vote for this dude???
The sign is misleading and a lie. It's Republicans for Sullivan. Not Democrats. I may not be 100% behind Ellrich, but I'm voting for him because Sullivan would be oh so much worse.
I saw for a Sullivan ad last night. Nowhere did he mention that he is the republican nominee, nor did a (R) appear anywhere on the graphics. If you didn't know you'd think he is a democrat looking for "your vote".
Very deceptive and misleading
Anonymous
11/07/2022 19:19
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares? He doesn't have a chance of winning
People who value honesty and transparency. It matters because it sets precedents for deliberately misleading campaign materials. Whether or not he — or any one particular candidate — has a chance of winning isn’t the most critical issue here.
I agree with you. Which is why I hope you are as equally, or more, upset with the Maryland democratic committee that created ads on behalf of Dan Cox, when he was running against Kelly Schultz in the primary.
Its pure manipulation by the left.
And it really pisses me off, because it works. I cannot vote for Dan Cox. But I would’ve voted for Kelly. It was incredibly dishonest by the Democrats.
I can’t answer that without seeing the ads. If the ads correctly identified his party and his positions, and correctly indicated who was paying for the ads, I probably would have been ok with them. If the ads did not do those things, I would view that as being extremely problematic. OP
Oh please Kelly is a POS liar just like the rest of the republican party
There is not one republican to vote for they all are RACIST ANTI SEMITE ELECTION DENYING DEMOCRACY KILLING CRAP.
I’m not sure why you posted this as a reply to my comment. My concern has simply been that I think campaign materials should be transparent.
Perhaps your all-caps ranting should be focused elsewhere. OP
Anonymous
11/07/2022 16:19
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares? He doesn't have a chance of winning
People who value honesty and transparency. It matters because it sets precedents for deliberately misleading campaign materials. Whether or not he — or any one particular candidate — has a chance of winning isn’t the most critical issue here.
I agree with you. Which is why I hope you are as equally, or more, upset with the Maryland democratic committee that created ads on behalf of Dan Cox, when he was running against Kelly Schultz in the primary.
Its pure manipulation by the left.
And it really pisses me off, because it works. I cannot vote for Dan Cox. But I would’ve voted for Kelly. It was incredibly dishonest by the Democrats.
I can’t answer that without seeing the ads. If the ads correctly identified his party and his positions, and correctly indicated who was paying for the ads, I probably would have been ok with them. If the ads did not do those things, I would view that as being extremely problematic. OP
Oh please Kelly is a POS liar just like the rest of the republican party
There is not one republican to vote for they all are RACIST ANTI SEMITE ELECTION DENYING DEMOCRACY KILLING CRAP.
Anonymous
11/07/2022 16:16
Subject: Sullivan — deliberately misleading
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reality is that Elrich is pretty ideologically aligned with voters in this county.
Then why did he win the primary by only 33 votes?
Go ask Hans Riemer.