Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget he was an ass thrice! The first time he complained about a hair in his food only after he had eaten the entree!
Second time he sent back the egg-yolk omelet for having some white. BS that his wife is allergic only to egg whites.
Third time he got upset the egg-yolk omelet came with fries instead of salad.
Now if his wife is allergic to fries then I feel sad for her but he’s still a tiny cretin for yelling at servers.
The server obviously didn't handle it well.
What did the server obviously mishandle?
Multiple mistakes. "I'm so sorry!" goes a long way. Likewise taking responsibility for the error and the annoyance it caused. Not once, but twice. Come on how unprofessional.
you mean the minimum wage hourly worker? Yes, she said "Oh my, let me take that back for you"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget he was an ass thrice! The first time he complained about a hair in his food only after he had eaten the entree!
Second time he sent back the egg-yolk omelet for having some white. BS that his wife is allergic only to egg whites.
Third time he got upset the egg-yolk omelet came with fries instead of salad.
Now if his wife is allergic to fries then I feel sad for her but he’s still a tiny cretin for yelling at servers.
The server obviously didn't handle it well.
What did the server obviously mishandle?
Multiple mistakes. "I'm so sorry!" goes a long way. Likewise taking responsibility for the error and the annoyance it caused. Not once, but twice. Come on how unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget he was an ass thrice! The first time he complained about a hair in his food only after he had eaten the entree!
Second time he sent back the egg-yolk omelet for having some white. BS that his wife is allergic only to egg whites.
Third time he got upset the egg-yolk omelet came with fries instead of salad.
Now if his wife is allergic to fries then I feel sad for her but he’s still a tiny cretin for yelling at servers.
The server obviously didn't handle it well.
What did the server obviously mishandle?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think it’s weird that he is speaking for his wife? Was she not there?
He was the rude/banned one. He can take the heat.
If you are allergic to something, donktmorder it in a restaurant!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget he was an ass thrice! The first time he complained about a hair in his food only after he had eaten the entree!
Second time he sent back the egg-yolk omelet for having some white. BS that his wife is allergic only to egg whites.
Third time he got upset the egg-yolk omelet came with fries instead of salad.
Now if his wife is allergic to fries then I feel sad for her but he’s still a tiny cretin for yelling at servers.
The server obviously didn't handle it well.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget he was an ass thrice! The first time he complained about a hair in his food only after he had eaten the entree!
Second time he sent back the egg-yolk omelet for having some white. BS that his wife is allergic only to egg whites.
Third time he got upset the egg-yolk omelet came with fries instead of salad.
Now if his wife is allergic to fries then I feel sad for her but he’s still a tiny cretin for yelling at servers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People expect their food to come out correctly. He sent it back and it came back wrong for the second time. They should have offered him the meal and drinks on the house right then and there. Who expects to wait to eat while their meal is prepared not once, not twice but THREE TIMES??? Come on. He was probably hangry.
It's not like he's going to wither and die of starvation...
Neither is the waitress he complained to about it. The restaurant should have been highly apologetic, not defensive and aggressive.
Are you familiar with the concept of not kicking down? The server was apologetic and Corden was an ass. Then the replacement order had potatoes instead of salad and Corden was an ass about that, too.
When a restaurant screws up, it owes you a corrected order. A lot of them will throw in freebies, too, as a gesture of goodwill, but Corden had already demanded those (why? He can afford to pay for drinks). If it screws up again, it needs to keep trying until it gets things right. But as long as employees are making a good faith effort to fix things, why be a douche? What does that achieve?
Well, yes. You make it sound like, they gave him a free dessert and he was an ass about that, too. No, they messed up his order -- twice.
I was a waitress for years when I was young. A manager would have comped his check or given him something for free right away if a waitress or the kitchen messed up the replacement order. Good grief, your standards are low. Where do you eat, McDonalds?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People expect their food to come out correctly. He sent it back and it came back wrong for the second time. They should have offered him the meal and drinks on the house right then and there. Who expects to wait to eat while their meal is prepared not once, not twice but THREE TIMES??? Come on. He was probably hangry.
It's not like he's going to wither and die of starvation...
Neither is the waitress he complained to about it. The restaurant should have been highly apologetic, not defensive and aggressive.
Are you familiar with the concept of not kicking down? The server was apologetic and Corden was an ass. Then the replacement order had potatoes instead of salad and Corden was an ass about that, too.
When a restaurant screws up, it owes you a corrected order. A lot of them will throw in freebies, too, as a gesture of goodwill, but Corden had already demanded those (why? He can afford to pay for drinks). If it screws up again, it needs to keep trying until it gets things right. But as long as employees are making a good faith effort to fix things, why be a douche? What does that achieve?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think it’s weird that he is speaking for his wife? Was she not there?
He was the rude/banned one. He can take the heat.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think it’s weird that he is speaking for his wife? Was she not there?