Anonymous wrote:Would the situation be different if the applicant is a boy? Our son has about the same GPA at a Big 5 school and is also interested in Middlebury, Bowdoin, Colby, Hamilton and Colgate as potential ED1 schools. We are full pay but no other hooks other than we know he will have strong recommendations. ACT score is a 33 but he may be able to bump it up to a 34 this fall. Not sure how much of a difference an extra point makes so wondering if it better that he focuses on his senior year courses so his mid-term grades are strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will the Colby/Hamilton coaches provide support for ED2, assuming positive pre-reads? Typically, the slots and support are for ED1 applicants. It might be worth clarifying when you reach that conversation.
+10000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our DD from one of the area private schools (Top 5 according to DCUM) is really interested in Bowdoin and Middlebury. She wants to ED at one of the two schools and we are looking for guidance about which one gives a bigger bump for ED. Our DD's GPA is about 3.68. She will be going test optional. She has some sports leadership activities (Captain of teams since 11th grade) and should have excellent recommendations. At her private school, the regular admits for Bowdoin and Middlebury are around the 3.75 - 3.8 range so she is not competitive for RD. Unfortunately, there are not enough kids from her school doing ED to Bowdoin/Middlebury to get accurate Naviance data for this subset. Any anecdotal and/or factual advice would be really helpful. She honestly loved both schools from her visit and can see herself at either campus so her focus is on making the right ED decision. We are full pay if that helps.
I’ve heard of recruited athletes for NESCAC schools not passing academic pre-reads with a better gpa than 3.68. The only NESCAC schools that you are in play for are Conn College and Trinity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They both offer ED2, so she should apply to her preferred school ED1, plan to file to the other ED2, and have a Plan C (St. Lawrence? Whitman?) she'd be excited about.
I think she’s going to end up disappointed with this approach. I’d choose one for ED1 and then go for a more reasonable ED2. It’s really easy to get boxed out from the small lacs if you’re not in at ED. Middlebury is larger so I think it’s the better bet. Coming from a private and with athletics as her ec, she’s really not bringing much diversity from all the athletic recruits.
Exactly. Good friend's DC applied ED1 for one of those two last cycle then to a very slightly less competitive for ED2 and was boxed out - denied not just deferred - at both. Think GPA higher than OP's DC and had good test scores.
Our full pay DC had a similar (maybe slightly lower) GPA, a 34 ACT, two varsity sports but not captain, and very impressive ECs (not national level but definitely showed continuity in and connection among them). His school CC - also the office director - dissuaded DC from applying ED to one of these schools. Said that DC would get deferred in ED1 then denied in RD and asked if that is how DC wanted the ED card to play out.
If OP's DC will be unhappy if they do not try, then risk it on Middlebury as I strongly doubt Bowdoin will even consider. But then they need to have a good list in the three categories, some probable EAs, and be ready to go ED2 with a lower ranked school.
Make a concrete ED2 suggestion. The only LACs I can think of that are similar to Midd and Bowdoin but more selective than St. Lawrence and Whitman are Colby and Hamilton--neither of which is a meaningfully easier admit than Midd or Bowdoin. (I suppose maybe Kenyon, but that's a significantly different locale.) Since DD will get admitted to St. Lawrence and/or Whitman RD, why not spend her ED bullets on her actual first and second choices?
Your info on Colby and Hamilton may be a bit dated. Hamilton, in particular, is a very hot school right now and as difficult to get into than Middlebury. Colby just behind. Fact is the majority of NESCACs are very difficult to get into.
Anonymous wrote:Will the Colby/Hamilton coaches provide support for ED2, assuming positive pre-reads? Typically, the slots and support are for ED1 applicants. It might be worth clarifying when you reach that conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They both offer ED2, so she should apply to her preferred school ED1, plan to file to the other ED2, and have a Plan C (St. Lawrence? Whitman?) she'd be excited about.
I think she’s going to end up disappointed with this approach. I’d choose one for ED1 and then go for a more reasonable ED2. It’s really easy to get boxed out from the small lacs if you’re not in at ED. Middlebury is larger so I think it’s the better bet. Coming from a private and with athletics as her ec, she’s really not bringing much diversity from all the athletic recruits.
Exactly. Good friend's DC applied ED1 for one of those two last cycle then to a very slightly less competitive for ED2 and was boxed out - denied not just deferred - at both. Think GPA higher than OP's DC and had good test scores.
Our full pay DC had a similar (maybe slightly lower) GPA, a 34 ACT, two varsity sports but not captain, and very impressive ECs (not national level but definitely showed continuity in and connection among them). His school CC - also the office director - dissuaded DC from applying ED to one of these schools. Said that DC would get deferred in ED1 then denied in RD and asked if that is how DC wanted the ED card to play out.
If OP's DC will be unhappy if they do not try, then risk it on Middlebury as I strongly doubt Bowdoin will even consider. But then they need to have a good list in the three categories, some probable EAs, and be ready to go ED2 with a lower ranked school.
Make a concrete ED2 suggestion. The only LACs I can think of that are similar to Midd and Bowdoin but more selective than St. Lawrence and Whitman are Colby and Hamilton--neither of which is a meaningfully easier admit than Midd or Bowdoin. (I suppose maybe Kenyon, but that's a significantly different locale.) Since DD will get admitted to St. Lawrence and/or Whitman RD, why not spend her ED bullets on her actual first and second choices?
Anonymous wrote:Our DD from one of the area private schools (Top 5 according to DCUM) is really interested in Bowdoin and Middlebury. She wants to ED at one of the two schools and we are looking for guidance about which one gives a bigger bump for ED. Our DD's GPA is about 3.68. She will be going test optional. She has some sports leadership activities (Captain of teams since 11th grade) and should have excellent recommendations. At her private school, the regular admits for Bowdoin and Middlebury are around the 3.75 - 3.8 range so she is not competitive for RD. Unfortunately, there are not enough kids from her school doing ED to Bowdoin/Middlebury to get accurate Naviance data for this subset. Any anecdotal and/or factual advice would be really helpful. She honestly loved both schools from her visit and can see herself at either campus so her focus is on making the right ED decision. We are full pay if that helps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ability to ED and potentially full pay is a hook.Could a kid with a 4.0/4.75 from an MCPS school, SAT of 1530, lots of sports ECs with leadership roles get into one of these two schools ED? I should add - no hooks.
Aren't both schools need-blind?
Yes, of course they are. Full pay will not help one iota at Bowdoin or Midd.
Really? Schools may be need blind, but not price insensitive.
I don’t know what that means wrt admissions. PP said full Pay is a “hook” these schools when it is not a hook or even considered.
I can't quite fathom that no school considers full pay in their decision. It may not be the final decision, but no school is going to admit a class with 100% of students receiving between 50-100% full FA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ability to ED and potentially full pay is a hook.Could a kid with a 4.0/4.75 from an MCPS school, SAT of 1530, lots of sports ECs with leadership roles get into one of these two schools ED? I should add - no hooks.
Aren't both schools need-blind?
Yes, of course they are. Full pay will not help one iota at Bowdoin or Midd.
Really? Schools may be need blind, but not price insensitive.
I don’t know what that means wrt admissions. PP said full Pay is a “hook” these schools when it is not a hook or even considered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ability to ED and potentially full pay is a hook.Could a kid with a 4.0/4.75 from an MCPS school, SAT of 1530, lots of sports ECs with leadership roles get into one of these two schools ED? I should add - no hooks.
Aren't both schools need-blind?
Yes, of course they are. Full pay will not help one iota at Bowdoin or Midd.
Really? Schools may be need blind, but not price insensitive.
Anonymous wrote:This is exactly what our private counselor said as well.Interesting. I have experience at 2 different Big 5s. Both schools have said that schools REALLY do mean Test Optional so if it's not going to help, don't worry about it.