Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
Well, for some it will make the news. The privileged will quietly take their daughters for abortions. I’m not sure how they’ll avoid CPS involvement, but I imagine that for some, even that will be kept private.
You sweet summer child. You do know that wealthy people obtained safe, medical abortions for their daughters while it was illegal, right? Without being punished, arrested, or found out? How, exactly, do you think that happened?
+1
Not for nothing do we not have a single name of the rapists who attacked girls trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell.
Anonymous wrote:The expectation that she must bear the child is idiotic.
Do we allow 10 year olds to adopt children? Nope.
Do we allow single, unemployed, underaged women in poor and abusive households to adopt children? Nope.
So why do think they somehow will be responsible providing moms in those circumstances when they get pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
They don’t care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
Well, for some it will make the news. The privileged will quietly take their daughters for abortions. I’m not sure how they’ll avoid CPS involvement, but I imagine that for some, even that will be kept private.
You sweet summer child. You do know that wealthy people obtained safe, medical abortions for their daughters while it was illegal, right? Without being punished, arrested, or found out? How, exactly, do you think that happened?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
Well, for some it will make the news. The privileged will quietly take their daughters for abortions. I’m not sure how they’ll avoid CPS involvement, but I imagine that for some, even that will be kept private.
Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
Anonymous wrote:Is there ANY circumstance in which a child would be allowed to have a medical abortion in the states that outlaw it? Is there any age that is SO YOUNG that an exception would be made?
I ask because in 1939 a 5 y.o. girl gave birth to a 6-lb. baby in Peru. Yes, it's true. The doctors hypothesized she had an "extraordinary hormonal disorder of pituitary origins." She had had a period since the age of 3 and had fully formed breasts.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/youngest-mother/
Anonymous wrote:Anti-abortion extremists, do you honestly think such cases aren't going to keep happening? And every time you can guarantee they are going to make the news. Because most mothers, even those who declare themselves anti-abortion, are not going to sit still if their 10 year old baby is denied an abortion and are going to do what it takes to make sure their little bodies don't have to delivery a full-term baby.
Anonymous wrote:
So Noem thinks "every single life is precious." Apparently a 10yo's life isn't precious. She could die in childbirth. Her body isn't precious.
Shame on Dana Bash. She should have stopped agreeing with Noem on that point. She should have asked her if that girl's life was as precious as the 6-week embryo growing inside her that could even be her sibling. No more air time for perverts like Noem.