Anonymous wrote:I think we can all agree this as Mitch McConnell's fault
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies
Abortion won't stop. It will just be the rich that get it.
Guess Mississippi will limit abortions to 15 weeks pregnant and under.
That’s 96% of abortions anyhow and still a carve out for health if the women.
Who’s out there hemming and hawing about getting an abortion for 15, 20, 25 weeks? Waiting for a payout or an engagement? Sounds like drama.
Sounds like dire fetal anomalies and other unexpected pregnancy complications that arise later in pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The next time a natural disaster hit a red state I will laugh and call it gods plan.
To be fair, abortion has killed more lives than ay naturel disaster
Anonymous wrote:So gun safety should NOT be decided by state legislatures (such as the NY legislature), but abortion should be. Right.
It's horrific that a 6-3 majority thinks so little of precedent, of lying under oath, or of women's privacy rights. I had an abortion at age 22--so grateful I lived in a country (not the US) where abortion was safe and legal.
There will be A LOT of litigation surrounding this, since your right to an abortion will vary depending on where you live--denying you equal protection of the laws.
Anonymous wrote: This is not something I thought I would ever actually see.
Kudos to the SCOTUS on this. Always should have been up to the states.
Anonymous wrote:What a bunch of cowards, with a summer Friday news release. They all fled to their vacation homes last night to hide.
Anonymous wrote:Now that the decision has been issued and there is no argument for “influencing”, it’s time to protest their homes, their places of worship, and their kids schools until they have no choice but to put themselves into a bunker for the rest of their lives.
Anonymous wrote:I think we can all agree this as Mitch McConnell's fault
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How was it 6-3.
Is the rationale purely and legally to have the states decide, this is out of the purvey of Fed and constitution?
5-4 to strike down Roe v Wade. 6-3 to uphold the 16 week ruling.
So the real change is nationally it moved from 20-24 weeks to 16.
States can make it more time if desired. Carve outs for mom health and baby genetic risks?
No. 5-4 carries the day. States can ban abortion outright and many already have, since they have trigger laws on the books.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activist right-wing pieces of trash on SCOTUS.
That's interesting that you used the word "trash." That's exactly where over 60 million growing babies were placed.
No. They weren’t babies you idiot.
I just had a miscarriage this fall. My “baby” was flushed down the toilet. Just because my embryo’s chromosomal issue happen to show up at 6 weeks doesn’t mean it was any less of an issue than fetuses that can’t survive after birth.
You are acting like trash by denigrating my miscarriage and saying I just “flushed” a baby. It was a clump of cells that had the potential to be a baby. No 10 week embryo is a baby.
Learn some science.
They were, in fact, babies growing inside their mothers.
Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?
Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?