Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you can't afford to buy a second home (join the club) and are blaming your siblings for that fact? Okay.
OP wanted to buy out the uncle together with her siblings (jointly) but the siblings said no. OP and her spouse could not afford to buy out the uncle on their own. This is how I interpret the story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
You ... get that my family without a beach house head living and strong traditions, too? That gathering and shucking pecans with my grandmother, her hand on mine as we rolled out the poor dough, are cherished, right?
That our giant family reunions riverside -- without a beach house -- full of games and laughing cousins were amazing, chasing fireflies and my uncle playing the violin as dusk came down?
Do you admit that you, who did not experience it, don't really understand and find it easy to be dismissive of that?
It's there any way at all you can stretch your brain to understand that even, yes even!, someone in your social circle might have married into a family with different and cherished traditions, or even -- even! -- themselves remember and cherish something different from you? Any way at all?
Or is it really that just the wealth-related traditions that you happen to like are the only ones that count?
Are you just as prone to dismissing my experience because you did not share it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really
understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
You ... get that my family without a beach house head living and strong traditions, too? That gathering and shucking pecans with my grandmother, her hand on mine as we rolled out the poor dough, are cherished, right?
That our giant family reunions riverside -- without a beach house -- full of games and laughing cousins were amazing, chasing fireflies and my uncle playing the violin as dusk came down?
Do you admit that you, who did not experience it, don't really understand and find it easy to be dismissive of that?
It's there any way at all you can stretch your brain to understand that even, yes even!, someone in your social circle might have married into a family with different and cherished traditions, or even -- even! -- themselves remember and cherish something different from you? Any way at all?
Or is it really that just the wealth-related traditions that you happen to like are the only ones that count?
Are you just as prone to dismissing my experience because you did not share it?
Thank you for confirming the point that miserable serial posters like you are triggered about topics like this. You like to see UMC people like OP knocked down a peg or two. And you have zero grasp of wealth, land, inheritance and family estate planning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
You ... get that my family without a beach house head living and strong traditions, too? That gathering and shucking pecans with my grandmother, her hand on mine as we rolled out the poor dough, are cherished, right?
That our giant family reunions riverside -- without a beach house -- full of games and laughing cousins were amazing, chasing fireflies and my uncle playing the violin as dusk came down?
Do you admit that you, who did not experience it, don't really understand and find it easy to be dismissive of that?
It's there any way at all you can stretch your brain to understand that even, yes even!, someone in your social circle might have married into a family with different and cherished traditions, or even -- even! -- themselves remember and cherish something different from you? Any way at all?
Or is it really that just the wealth-related traditions that you happen to like are the only ones that count?
Are you just as prone to dismissing my experience because you did not share it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then you should have given them their share in cash. This is your fault, not theirs. I assume you couldn’t afford to buy them out?
We all have similar HHIs, so it would have been unfair to put the full burden on me and my husband. It was a very fair price but it wasn’t exactly a small sim; ot would have been a stretch for just us. Not to mention they likely would have tried to keep using it, right. I didn’t want that dynamic either.
Then you made a choice. Live with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My inlaws have a beach house in the Rehoboth, OC area. My husband and I have already agreed, when the time comes, we are not going to split it with our BIL and his wife as we travel to too many other places. The taxes alone aren't worth it for the 2 times a year we go.
Is this fabricated? Because you’re trying to come across as smug and well traveled but you’re bragging about putting something very stupid on record with your in-laws. Congrats on a permitting your in-laws to give your BIL and wife 100% of the beach house instead of 50% — which won’t impact the rest of the estate, of course.
I think they mean they won't buy it together with them when the ILs decide to sell. At least that's how I read it. Not taking half in an estate would be dumb.
The owners are going to sign 100% ownership of that beach house over to the son who uses it because the smug “well traveled” daughter in law ran her mouth. She thought she sounded so smart and sophisticated but she actually played herself and her husband out of a very valuable share of property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP.
Just to be clear -- is someone really implying that you have to own a beach house to create good memories and a happy childhood for your children? Really, or am I misreading how the dichotomy is set up?
I'm not sure that people without beach houses are confined to mortgagor children. That's ... an odd take.
I assume people who did not grow up with access to family vacation homes don’t really understand, so it’s easy to be dismissive about the experiences, memories and traditions. A rental is not the same thing, not even close. And also, if you’re miserable and hate where you’re from or are estranged from family, it’s even easier to be dismissive about all of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My inlaws have a beach house in the Rehoboth, OC area. My husband and I have already agreed, when the time comes, we are not going to split it with our BIL and his wife as we travel to too many other places. The taxes alone aren't worth it for the 2 times a year we go.
Is this fabricated? Because you’re trying to come across as smug and well traveled but you’re bragging about putting something very stupid on record with your in-laws. Congrats on a permitting your in-laws to give your BIL and wife 100% of the beach house instead of 50% — which won’t impact the rest of the estate, of course.
I think they mean they won't buy it together with them when the ILs decide to sell. At least that's how I read it. Not taking half in an estate would be dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then you should have given them their share in cash. This is your fault, not theirs. I assume you couldn’t afford to buy them out?
We all have similar HHIs, so it would have been unfair to put the full burden on me and my husband. It was a very fair price but it wasn’t exactly a small sim; ot would have been a stretch for just us. Not to mention they likely would have tried to keep using it, right. I didn’t want that dynamic either.
So it was your decision not to buy it. Nobody to be mad at but yourself. Get over it.