Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
I think it could depend on the area. Some parents are more competitive than others. I had a neighbor pass me down a huge stack of worksheets and workbooks she used to prepare her child. I have a friend who is older and she stressed the importance. She said to fight it if my child didn’t get in. I also have talked to numerous parents who have gotten tutors for their children while in elementary school ( and their students were already performing well). I also know numerous parents that can care less.
In my current neighborhood people move here specifically for the schools. We have the top schools in the state. However, I’ve found it really depends on the teacher. My daughter had a new teacher that was horrible. She even told the parents that she applied and got the job so here she is. She didn’t seem to have a real interest in teaching. She would come to school and tell the kids she was too tired to teach today and would pop on a movie or let them play games.
I was in a similar program. The schools weren’t that great. I was able to thrive by being with like minded students.
It's a travesty that AAP demographics do not reflect the County demographics for blacks and Hispanic students. If TJ is headed in that direction, AAP certainly should make more progress or just have one system.
This is why I think AAP should be open to all. If you can keep up and make an A/B in the course, you get to stay. I feel like no one is pushing gen-ed kids to do better.
Many of the kids in Gen Ed are challenged by the curriculum. I have friends who have kids who are nervous for Algebra in 9th grade because they have struggled with math. I have friends whose kids are the same age as mine but they are struggling with the Gen Ed material. My kid has class mates who struggle with multi-digit addition. He has classmates who have not passed the multiplication test.
Just because people in this forum think the curriculum is easy doesn't make it so. The curriculum is just right for lots of the kids in Gen Ed, challenging for a good number, and hard for others.
There are always those kids who are on the borderline for AAP or needing services that struggle in the class. The kids on the higher end need something more but don't quite fit the criteria (whatever that is) for AAP and the kids on the lower end are struggling to get services that they need (Check the special needs forum for the awful stories). But Gen Ed tends to be a good fit for many kids. Those of you trying to get away from the Gen Ed kids are going to end up with a decent number in your child's classes in high school and some of them are going to do better then our kids.
shhhh, they don't want to hear it PP
signed a parent of a AAP kid
By high school and even by middle school, kids are tracked a lot more seriously. Your kid who is reading on or above grade level is not going to be in the same class as a student who is two grade levels behind once they hit middle school. It happens all the time in elementary though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
I think it could depend on the area. Some parents are more competitive than others. I had a neighbor pass me down a huge stack of worksheets and workbooks she used to prepare her child. I have a friend who is older and she stressed the importance. She said to fight it if my child didn’t get in. I also have talked to numerous parents who have gotten tutors for their children while in elementary school ( and their students were already performing well). I also know numerous parents that can care less.
In my current neighborhood people move here specifically for the schools. We have the top schools in the state. However, I’ve found it really depends on the teacher. My daughter had a new teacher that was horrible. She even told the parents that she applied and got the job so here she is. She didn’t seem to have a real interest in teaching. She would come to school and tell the kids she was too tired to teach today and would pop on a movie or let them play games.
I was in a similar program. The schools weren’t that great. I was able to thrive by being with like minded students.
It's a travesty that AAP demographics do not reflect the County demographics for blacks and Hispanic students. If TJ is headed in that direction, AAP certainly should make more progress or just have one system.
This is why I think AAP should be open to all. If you can keep up and make an A/B in the course, you get to stay. I feel like no one is pushing gen-ed kids to do better.
Many of the kids in Gen Ed are challenged by the curriculum. I have friends who have kids who are nervous for Algebra in 9th grade because they have struggled with math. I have friends whose kids are the same age as mine but they are struggling with the Gen Ed material. My kid has class mates who struggle with multi-digit addition. He has classmates who have not passed the multiplication test.
Just because people in this forum think the curriculum is easy doesn't make it so. The curriculum is just right for lots of the kids in Gen Ed, challenging for a good number, and hard for others.
There are always those kids who are on the borderline for AAP or needing services that struggle in the class. The kids on the higher end need something more but don't quite fit the criteria (whatever that is) for AAP and the kids on the lower end are struggling to get services that they need (Check the special needs forum for the awful stories). But Gen Ed tends to be a good fit for many kids. Those of you trying to get away from the Gen Ed kids are going to end up with a decent number in your child's classes in high school and some of them are going to do better then our kids.
shhhh, they don't want to hear it PP
signed a parent of a AAP kid
Anonymous wrote:Why are parents so hel! bent on getting their children into AAP?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
I think it could depend on the area. Some parents are more competitive than others. I had a neighbor pass me down a huge stack of worksheets and workbooks she used to prepare her child. I have a friend who is older and she stressed the importance. She said to fight it if my child didn’t get in. I also have talked to numerous parents who have gotten tutors for their children while in elementary school ( and their students were already performing well). I also know numerous parents that can care less.
In my current neighborhood people move here specifically for the schools. We have the top schools in the state. However, I’ve found it really depends on the teacher. My daughter had a new teacher that was horrible. She even told the parents that she applied and got the job so here she is. She didn’t seem to have a real interest in teaching. She would come to school and tell the kids she was too tired to teach today and would pop on a movie or let them play games.
I was in a similar program. The schools weren’t that great. I was able to thrive by being with like minded students.
It's a travesty that AAP demographics do not reflect the County demographics for blacks and Hispanic students. If TJ is headed in that direction, AAP certainly should make more progress or just have one system.
This is why I think AAP should be open to all. If you can keep up and make an A/B in the course, you get to stay. I feel like no one is pushing gen-ed kids to do better.
Many of the kids in Gen Ed are challenged by the curriculum. I have friends who have kids who are nervous for Algebra in 9th grade because they have struggled with math. I have friends whose kids are the same age as mine but they are struggling with the Gen Ed material. My kid has class mates who struggle with multi-digit addition. He has classmates who have not passed the multiplication test.
Just because people in this forum think the curriculum is easy doesn't make it so. The curriculum is just right for lots of the kids in Gen Ed, challenging for a good number, and hard for others.
There are always those kids who are on the borderline for AAP or needing services that struggle in the class. The kids on the higher end need something more but don't quite fit the criteria (whatever that is) for AAP and the kids on the lower end are struggling to get services that they need (Check the special needs forum for the awful stories). But Gen Ed tends to be a good fit for many kids. Those of you trying to get away from the Gen Ed kids are going to end up with a decent number in your child's classes in high school and some of them are going to do better then our kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was nearly desperate to get my 7yr old into Level IV because of the horrid education her sister got in 3-5th grade. My 10 year old has gotten ZERO diffentiation in math dispite being identified as above average upon arrival in 3rd grade. It is really sad that a child has to ask for harder work and sometimes gets it; but, NEVER gets it without asking.
It literally makes me sick that she has been left to her own devices for most of the past 3 years while her teachers spent all their time with struggling below average kids. I'm disgusted with the repeated (empty) school promises to provide differentiation for her in 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade. I regret ever sending her to that school. I actually believed FCPS hype about differentiation for all kids. Had I known the truth I would have gotten help to make a stronger Level IV package for her and gotten her out of there. I just hope her aptitude hasn't shriveled up and dried on the vine. We're hoping she recovers in middle school next year.
I literally cried with relief when my 2nd grader got selected for Level IV.
So, to answer the question about why all the hype about AAP: Because in Title One schools there are only two levels of learning that are addressed: average and below average. No one else matters.
Is there a reason you didn’t apply for LIV in third, fourth, and fifth grade? That path was available to you.
Anonymous wrote:I was nearly desperate to get my 7yr old into Level IV because of the horrid education her sister got in 3-5th grade. My 10 year old has gotten ZERO diffentiation in math dispite being identified as above average upon arrival in 3rd grade. It is really sad that a child has to ask for harder work and sometimes gets it; but, NEVER gets it without asking.
It literally makes me sick that she has been left to her own devices for most of the past 3 years while her teachers spent all their time with struggling below average kids. I'm disgusted with the repeated (empty) school promises to provide differentiation for her in 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade. I regret ever sending her to that school. I actually believed FCPS hype about differentiation for all kids. Had I known the truth I would have gotten help to make a stronger Level IV package for her and gotten her out of there. I just hope her aptitude hasn't shriveled up and dried on the vine. We're hoping she recovers in middle school next year.
I literally cried with relief when my 2nd grader got selected for Level IV.
So, to answer the question about why all the hype about AAP: Because in Title One schools there are only two levels of learning that are addressed: average and below average. No one else matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
I think it could depend on the area. Some parents are more competitive than others. I had a neighbor pass me down a huge stack of worksheets and workbooks she used to prepare her child. I have a friend who is older and she stressed the importance. She said to fight it if my child didn’t get in. I also have talked to numerous parents who have gotten tutors for their children while in elementary school ( and their students were already performing well). I also know numerous parents that can care less.
In my current neighborhood people move here specifically for the schools. We have the top schools in the state. However, I’ve found it really depends on the teacher. My daughter had a new teacher that was horrible. She even told the parents that she applied and got the job so here she is. She didn’t seem to have a real interest in teaching. She would come to school and tell the kids she was too tired to teach today and would pop on a movie or let them play games.
I was in a similar program. The schools weren’t that great. I was able to thrive by being with like minded students.
It's a travesty that AAP demographics do not reflect the County demographics for blacks and Hispanic students. If TJ is headed in that direction, AAP certainly should make more progress or just have one system.
This is why I think AAP should be open to all. If you can keep up and make an A/B in the course, you get to stay. I feel like no one is pushing gen-ed kids to do better.
Many of the kids in Gen Ed are challenged by the curriculum. I have friends who have kids who are nervous for Algebra in 9th grade because they have struggled with math. I have friends whose kids are the same age as mine but they are struggling with the Gen Ed material. My kid has class mates who struggle with multi-digit addition. He has classmates who have not passed the multiplication test.
Just because people in this forum think the curriculum is easy doesn't make it so. The curriculum is just right for lots of the kids in Gen Ed, challenging for a good number, and hard for others.
There are always those kids who are on the borderline for AAP or needing services that struggle in the class. The kids on the higher end need something more but don't quite fit the criteria (whatever that is) for AAP and the kids on the lower end are struggling to get services that they need (Check the special needs forum for the awful stories). But Gen Ed tends to be a good fit for many kids. Those of you trying to get away from the Gen Ed kids are going to end up with a decent number in your child's classes in high school and some of them are going to do better then our kids.
Anonymous wrote:To keep my kids out of the general population and with kids whose families at least moderately care about academics and future success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
I think it could depend on the area. Some parents are more competitive than others. I had a neighbor pass me down a huge stack of worksheets and workbooks she used to prepare her child. I have a friend who is older and she stressed the importance. She said to fight it if my child didn’t get in. I also have talked to numerous parents who have gotten tutors for their children while in elementary school ( and their students were already performing well). I also know numerous parents that can care less.
In my current neighborhood people move here specifically for the schools. We have the top schools in the state. However, I’ve found it really depends on the teacher. My daughter had a new teacher that was horrible. She even told the parents that she applied and got the job so here she is. She didn’t seem to have a real interest in teaching. She would come to school and tell the kids she was too tired to teach today and would pop on a movie or let them play games.
I was in a similar program. The schools weren’t that great. I was able to thrive by being with like minded students.
It's a travesty that AAP demographics do not reflect the County demographics for blacks and Hispanic students. If TJ is headed in that direction, AAP certainly should make more progress or just have one system.
This is why I think AAP should be open to all. If you can keep up and make an A/B in the course, you get to stay. I feel like no one is pushing gen-ed kids to do better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There really should be a middle track for average/above average kids without behavior issues.
That's called gen ed.
NP no way. Gen ed is filled with behavior issues.
The kids with the worst behaviors are in self-contained classes. Gen ed is the middle group.
No way. No teacher can handle that. Each class is selected to have a mix of different types of kids.