Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise to me those on the right are against this, however very surprised how many on left agree this is dangerous.

I'm not at all surprised that LWNJs would seek to tell others what is and is not "misinformation." They might as well simply say anything that doesn't suit our narrative is misinformation. That's what it boils down to. That you support it tells us all we need to know.

Was the 2020 election free and fair, and who won it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

We have a legitimate issue in the world and US of mostly Russian infused lies and disinformation polluting our body politic. How do you suggest we deal with it?

We already have a system. If someone writes or says something false and it's damaging they can be sued in court for libel or slander.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

We have a legitimate issue in the world and US of mostly Russian infused lies and disinformation polluting our body politic. How do you suggest we deal with it?

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise to me those on the right are against this, however very surprised how many on left agree this is dangerous.

I'm not at all surprised that LWNJs would seek to tell others what is and is not "misinformation." They might as well simply say anything that doesn't suit our narrative is misinformation. That's what it boils down to. That you support it tells us all we need to know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

We have a legitimate issue in the world and US of mostly Russian infused lies and disinformation polluting our body politic. How do you suggest we deal with it?

We already have a system. If someone writes or says something false and it's damaging they can be sued in court for libel or slander.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

We have a legitimate issue in the world and US of mostly Russian infused lies and disinformation polluting our body politic. How do you suggest we deal with it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

We have a legitimate issue in the world and US of mostly Russian infused lies and disinformation polluting our body politic. How do you suggest we deal with it?

Anonymous wrote:This is another desperate, insane attempt by a party that's quickly losing power to retain power. Instead, it just drives more people away (see the ratings and polls that continue to his new lows). Hopefully after 2022/2024 these lunatics are done for good.

Anonymous wrote:Nina Jankowicz's twitter handle is wiczipedia. Like Wikipedia and her last name mashed together. Does she consider herself to be like an encyclopedia? (big ego) Or is she one of those people who makes it their personal mission to constantly edit articles on Wikipedia to reflect their truth and preferred narrative? I guess the new job fits her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then there’s @LazyLogan, or the man who can’t seem to use Google. There are a lot of lazy people—mostly men—who seem to think women’s purpose on the internet is not to inform others about their expertise, analyze the news, or amplify their work, but to answer inane questions about basic concepts about which they could easily educate themselves.

https://www.wired.com/story/womans-guide-toxic-trolls-internet/

It's interesting how desirable she considers herself to be. Does she - or does she not - want Internet "followers"? All signs point to yes, she very much does. She's all over the internet and seems fixated on tweeting - about herself. But then she has the gall to criticize men who happen to follow her? Nina, you can't have it both ways. Either you're an attention whore, or you're a private citizen. You have chosen the former, so quit complaining.

Anonymous wrote:Then there’s @LazyLogan, or the man who can’t seem to use Google. There are a lot of lazy people—mostly men—who seem to think women’s purpose on the internet is not to inform others about their expertise, analyze the news, or amplify their work, but to answer inane questions about basic concepts about which they could easily educate themselves.

https://www.wired.com/story/womans-guide-toxic-trolls-internet/