Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ashley Judd
Nope!. As a member of the duo, The Judds, Naomi has won multiple grammy, country music and american music awards.
In country music, Naomi is more famous, sure. I just think that Ashley is more mainstream famous.
Ashley has been out of the public eye for twenty years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ashley Judd
Nope!. As a member of the duo, The Judds, Naomi has won multiple grammy, country music and american music awards.
In country music, Naomi is more famous, sure. I just think that Ashley is more mainstream famous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ashley Judd
Nope!. As a member of the duo, The Judds, Naomi has won multiple grammy, country music and american music awards.
Anonymous wrote:Ashley Judd
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dakota Johnson
Not sure about this, her parents were pretty huge back in the day.
No way Dakota Johnson is more famous than her parents.
Anonymous wrote:Ashley Judd
Anonymous wrote:I think some posters are just naming the offspring of famous actors, and because they are closer in age to the offspring, they think that person is more famous than their parent. Donald & Kiefer Sutherland is the perfect example. If you compare each body of work at next to one another at the offspring’s current age, you’d see the parent was much more prolific and well-known. Same with Goldie Hawn and Kate Hudson.
Anonymous wrote:This thread makes it really easy to estimate the poster’s age—or generation, anyway. I’m surprised by some of these answers for sure.
I think Miley Cyrus might be the best example so far. Billy Ray Cyrus was nationally known for a while but faded quickly. I think Miley has had much longer staying power.