Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't worry about it. Turning 6 at some point during the Kindergarten year is expected. Now if your children turned 6 before the school year even started, that would be a whole other story...
My oldest son was 6 when he started K. My younger son will also be 6 when he starts and neither one of them will have been held back. Both of their b-days are the first week of September so they miss the Sept. 1 cut-off. They both turn 5 a couple of days later. Waiting the year to start K when they were supposed to meant that they both turned 6 about a week before classes actually started.
Anonymous wrote:Here in Virginia the cut off for kindergarten is Sept 30th. So mu November born twins have to wait for kindergarten because they missed the cutoff by 5 weeks. It sucked! They were academically ready, but 5 weeks too young. Couldn't do anythign about it. SO my kids will be turning 6 in kindergarten.
Anonymous wrote:But yet, there are plenty who are holding their precious little ones back to give the gift of time.
Yes, in our days, it was not glossed with a term like "redshirting", but rather held back, failed, or some other negative connotation.
Anonymous wrote:Here in Virginia the cut off for kindergarten is Sept 30th. So mu November born twins have to wait for kindergarten because they missed the cutoff by 5 weeks. It sucked! They were academically ready, but 5 weeks too young. Couldn't do anythign about it. SO my kids will be turning 6 in kindergarten.
Anonymous wrote:I just have to think that all the parents who are so up in arms about red-shirted kids must have very young kids, either not in elementary or just starting. You are weaving all sorts of scenarios, based on what? Those of us with older kids -- middle school, high school -- seem to agree that in our kids' grades it isn't that big a deal.
Anonymous wrote:Her redshirted child was rejected at the first choice school but admitted at the second choice school. It's a little awkward, because her DC is currently in K and doesn't understand why he will be in K again next year. He may be young, but he's smart enough to know that his classmates are going onto first grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very close relative redshirted her (May birthday) DC this year--WPPSI score in the high 90s and no developmental delays. She just thought that in this competitive admissions process, her DC would appear to be a stronger, more mature and more compelling applicant if compared to "younger" kids. So for those of you pretending that anyone who redshirts must be doing so for "honorable" reasons, you can drop the Pollyanna act.
Did it work? Why do schools go along with this? Can't they push back? At our school, I know of at least one case where the parents would have liked to redshirt and the school insisted on placement in the higher grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 19-year-old "men" thing is just bait. I went to a subpar suburban high school many years ago and there were plenty of 19 year-old "men" there. They had been held back. Many of them had troubled family lives, no academic support at home, police histories, etc. I don't know if I'd say they were "trouble" for those not in their group, but the situation was not great. Nobody was up in arms about it though, yet somehow it is kids with parents affluent enough to buy them an additional year of preschool, boys whose parents are concerned enough about their social-emotional development that they think they need extra "time" or OT for their small motor to develop -- these are the boys you are so worried about???? You think these kids are "mollycoddled" but you also think they are going to turn into hardened rapists?????
Two words.
George Hugueley.