Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are great. Representation matters, except when Black folk disagree with you.

Anonymous wrote:disqualifying for ward 3

Another stupid take. Not only did she donate to Pence, she also supported "abstinence only" education for students, and she was a registered republican voting in republican primaries until Mary Cheh decided not to run. She's not a democrat. Not in party affiliation. Not in views. Not in anything. That's well and good. But she shouldn't be running in a democrat primary.

Is there a record somewhere of Monash supporting abstinence education? That’s concerning to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Updated campaign finance filings

https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/council-ward-3

That’s interesting. Only Frumin, Duncan and Krucoff have a majority of their contributions from Ward 4 and Krucoff is barely over 50%.

Probably a good indicator of which candidates have the most support.

Based in fundraising only, Frumin is looking like the early favorite, however he’s closely associated with Silverman. Duncan looks strong, however it’s hard to tell how well she’ll do because she’s definitely an outsider. The dark horse is looking like Monash.

Monash is a republican who gave money to Pence and just switched her party status to run for this seat. She has ZERO chance (and very little financial support from within the Ward)

I am not sure how Frumin is associated with Silverman. He isn't a rank progressive like others in the race. I am curious as to what you base that on.

It’s clear that you haven’t looked at the link. Some people like to consider things like facts and data before forming opinions.

1. Monash has the 2nd most $ in fundraising and 25% of her contributions come from Ward 3. She’s has raised more $ from Ward 3 residents than Washington Post endorsed Goulet.

2. There is very strong overlap between Frumin donors and Silverman donors. Indicating that they are politically closely associated.

I’m sorry that this information upsets you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

He should print up "endorsed by the Washington Post" stickers to slap on his yard signs. What do you figure, a half dozen?

He's also a wee bit of a racist. Well, not a traditional racist. I'm not sure the right word. Bigot maybe? He seems to be a bigot.

How so?

DP, he made a major reveal in a debate last week when he suggested that the people of color who live in the Ward are all on vouchers.

I mean, that is the perception when you choose to live in Palisades and insulate yourself from the rest of the city.

Whose perception?

Do you have a cite for your debate claim?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

He should print up "endorsed by the Washington Post" stickers to slap on his yard signs. What do you figure, a half dozen?

He's also a wee bit of a racist. Well, not a traditional racist. I'm not sure the right word. Bigot maybe? He seems to be a bigot.

How so?

DP, he made a major reveal in a debate last week when he suggested that the people of color who live in the Ward are all on vouchers.

I mean, that is the perception when you choose to live in Palisades and insulate yourself from the rest of the city.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Updated campaign finance filings

https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/council-ward-3

That’s interesting. Only Frumin, Duncan and Krucoff have a majority of their contributions from Ward 4 and Krucoff is barely over 50%.

Probably a good indicator of which candidates have the most support.

Based in fundraising only, Frumin is looking like the early favorite, however he’s closely associated with Silverman. Duncan looks strong, however it’s hard to tell how well she’ll do because she’s definitely an outsider. The dark horse is looking like Monash.

Monash is a republican who gave money to Pence and just switched her party status to run for this seat. She has ZERO chance (and very little financial support from within the Ward)

I am not sure how Frumin is associated with Silverman. He isn't a rank progressive like others in the race. I am curious as to what you base that on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

He should print up "endorsed by the Washington Post" stickers to slap on his yard signs. What do you figure, a half dozen?

He's also a wee bit of a racist. Well, not a traditional racist. I'm not sure the right word. Bigot maybe? He seems to be a bigot.

How so?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

He should print up "endorsed by the Washington Post" stickers to slap on his yard signs. What do you figure, a half dozen?

He's also a wee bit of a racist. Well, not a traditional racist. I'm not sure the right word. Bigot maybe? He seems to be a bigot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Updated campaign finance filings

https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/council-ward-3

That’s interesting. Only Frumin, Duncan and Krucoff have a majority of their contributions from Ward 4 and Krucoff is barely over 50%.

Probably a good indicator of which candidates have the most support.

Based in fundraising only, Frumin is looking like the early favorite, however he’s closely associated with Silverman. Duncan looks strong, however it’s hard to tell how well she’ll do because she’s definitely an outsider. The dark horse is looking like Monash.

*Ward 3

Anonymous wrote:Updated campaign finance filings

https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/council-ward-3

That’s interesting. Only Frumin, Duncan and Krucoff have a majority of their contributions from Ward 4 and Krucoff is barely over 50%.

Probably a good indicator of which candidates have the most support.

Based in fundraising only, Frumin is looking like the early favorite, however he’s closely associated with Silverman. Duncan looks strong, however it’s hard to tell how well she’ll do because she’s definitely an outsider. The dark horse is looking like Monash.

Updated campaign finance filings

https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/council-ward-3

Anonymous wrote:Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

He should print up "endorsed by the Washington Post" stickers to slap on his yard signs. What do you figure, a half dozen?

Goulet receives the kiss-of-death Washington Post endorsement.

Good luck with that.

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are great. Representation matters, except when Black folk disagree with you.

She literally hasn't been a part of the DC political system at all for most of her adult life. Not voting in primaries? Not engaged at all in the life of the community? Why didn't see run as a republican like 3 others are doing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are great. Representation matters, except when Black folk disagree with you.

Anonymous wrote:disqualifying for ward 3

Another stupid take. Not only did she donate to Pence, she also supported "abstinence only" education for students, and she was a registered republican voting in republican primaries until Mary Cheh decided not to run. She's not a democrat. Not in party affiliation. Not in views. Not in anything. That's well and good. But she shouldn't be running in a democrat primary.

It’s interesting how common a person insulting another’s intelligence lacks reading comprehension and cognitive thought.

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are great. Representation matters, except when Black folk disagree with you.

Anonymous wrote:disqualifying for ward 3

Another stupid take. Not only did she donate to Pence, she also supported "abstinence only" education for students, and she was a registered republican voting in republican primaries until Mary Cheh decided not to run. She's not a democrat. Not in party affiliation. Not in views. Not in anything. That's well and good. But she shouldn't be running in a democrat primary.